https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7016
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||apa...@hege.li
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7016
Adam Katz antis...@khopis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7016
--- Comment #2 from Adam Katz antis...@khopis.com ---
Correction from my text in comment #1:
To safely fold these in, they'd need to be unscored (or scored 0.001) and
used as predicates that are outside of the automated system. This
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7016
Bug ID: 7016
Summary: third party auto generated rules in sandboxes
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6907
AXB axb.li...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6907
Bug ID: 6907
Summary: move production BLs out of sandboxes and into defaul
rules dir (if as required)
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.4.0
Hardware: All
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6907
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6907
--- Comment #2 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
obviously not a functional gain.
pretty much like keeping drawers cupboards neat tidy :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6907
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.4.1
As noted in 6536, I've attempted to add more clarification from the
consensus at this link:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleSandboxes#Editing_Another_Developer.27s_Sandbox
Regards,
KAM
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5723
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-20 02:20 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
rulesrc/sandbox/dos/70_bugs.cf: 0 active rules, 5 other
this is ok -- every rule has a T_ prefix, so they may be
working fine.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5723
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5723
Summary: clear out zero-hitting rules files from sandboxes
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
of steps are a little hazy -- I'm not sure if we've
ever decided how we're going to move rules from sandboxes to core
rules. Can anyone comment about this? I guess we don't need to worry
about that until closer to release time.
Anyways... it looks like the mechanism is pretty much set up... now
all we
we're going to move rules from sandboxes to core
rules. Can anyone comment about this? I guess we don't need to worry
about that until closer to release time.
Yep, that's the thing -- we haven't quite decided what those
promotion criteria are. next step.
Anyways... it looks like the mechanism
organization a month down the
line.
That should make make happy, since things would seldom change, and the rules
could be expected to be valid and stable.
For testing, it should come from sandboxes, and ideally
a)the file names would be [nn_]arbitrary_name.cf
b)duplicate names from various
and
paste, and move around, rules from personal sandboxes into other
locations.
Hmm... there's no need for the sandbox name to be a person's name; it
can also be e.g. for classes of rules, I think.In that case, the
sandbox dir would become a place for both
- user sandboxes (jm, felicity etc
So I was prodding around the sandboxes bit, and noticed that mkrules doesn't
copy \d.+\.(?:cf|pm)$ to the rules dir... So it seems that if I wanted some
rules to be put in for testing, I have to name them word.cf or something,
and then they get copied. But if I wanted my own 70_testing.cf
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 02:20:34PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Currently I'm putting my test rules into the 70_testing.cf like we've always
done, but I'd like to move them into my own sandbox area. Just want to make
sure I understand the idea about how things are supposed to be layed out
Theo Van Dinter writes:
So I was prodding around the sandboxes bit, and noticed that mkrules doesn't
copy \d.+\.(?:cf|pm)$ to the rules dir... So it seems that if I wanted some
rules to be put in for testing, I have to name them word.cf or something,
and then they get copied. But if I
20 matches
Mail list logo
