http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 16:13 ---
' - Most scalar accesses to $conf-{config_item_name} become accesses to
$conf-get(ID). ID is a numeric constant exported by Constants.pm. (why use
numeric
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:25:55AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
4. SURBL query traffic
mostly good if you subtract the blacklisted ones
But any big, as-yet-undetected spam domains can also generate
much traffic.
What if you were to have a friendly ISP that would be willing to send you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kelsey Cummings writes:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:25:55AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
4. SURBL query traffic
mostly good if you subtract the blacklisted ones
But any big, as-yet-undetected spam domains can also generate
much
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:05:18PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
Kelsey Cummings writes:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:25:55AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
4. SURBL query traffic
mostly good if you subtract the blacklisted ones
But any big, as-yet-undetected spam domains can also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kelsey Cummings writes:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:05:18PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
Kelsey Cummings writes:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:25:55AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
4. SURBL query traffic
mostly good if you subtract
[moving to dev since there's nothing private at this point]
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:59:23PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
[discussion about having the parent doing forking for bayes expire, etc.]
I looked at this briefly today. There are some Apache::*
modules that we could mimic to
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 21:36 ---
So what else can I provide to help figure this out?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3874
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 02:21 ---
Subject: Re: New: Definitions of internal/trusted networks too vague
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3874
Thanks - an apologies for the
Daniel Quinlan, one of the principal SpamAssassin architects had
some good suggestions for reducing false positives in the SURBL
data. One was using public databases of URIs, particularly
hand-built ones like dmoz.org and wikipedia.org or even yahoo.com
as sources of mostly legitimate domains.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 06:09 ---
The last comment (probably the last 2 comments) sound like the same problem as
bug 3826. For what it is worth, I see no evidence of either of the last 2 on
our
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 06:13 ---
hmm.. i didnt have any problem scanning that message.
2004-10-06 13:12:22 [29542] i: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
at port 40076
2004-10-06
Hi Jeff,
You might want to reconsider your use of the entire DMOZ directory.
There may be some subtrees that you can ignore. Of the 1338 DMOZ false
positives, how many of them are from the same sections on DMOZ?
Henry
Jeff Chan wrote:
Daniel Quinlan, one of the principal SpamAssassin architects
On Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 6:37:55 AM, Henry Stern wrote:
Hi Jeff,
You might want to reconsider your use of the entire DMOZ directory.
There may be some subtrees that you can ignore. Of the 1338 DMOZ false
positives, how many of them are from the same sections on DMOZ?
Henry
To be
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
Summary: Bayes tokenizer method uses a lot of memory when hashing
raw tokens
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:25 ---
Subject: Re: Bayes tokenizer method creates space wasting hash
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:48:18AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd rather we make sure we
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=2423)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2423action=view)
Patch File
Patch against 3.0 branch
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bayes tokenizer method uses |[review] Bayes tokenizer
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:59 ---
I've applied that patch to an instance of ours that was quitting every day or
two, so we'll see how it handles.
Solaris 9 with Perl 5.8.3 on a V240 in case it
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 10:00 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bug 3875: Use of map/grep/sha1 contruct causes large memory bloat, switch to
simple foreach loop
I'd be +1 on including this in 3.0.1. I think the bloat is bad news.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 11:06 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
WORKSFORME
I have 252 hits in my spamd logs, about 1.2% of total email (ham and
spam). All 252 appear to be spam. The rule is more accurate than
ever. :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3494
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 11:11 ---
Subject: Re: NO_DNS_FOR_FROM needs major fixing
WORKSFORME
I have 252 hits in my spamd logs, about 1.2% of total email (ham and
spam). All 252 appear to be
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3494
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 11:24 ---
Subject: Re: NO_DNS_FOR_FROM needs major fixing
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:11:51AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 252 hits in my spamd logs, about 1.2%
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bayes tokenizer method |[review] Bayes tokenizer
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:06 ---
hrmm... i finally have a dead spamd on a new box. here are the details of what
i found. as you can see, it was using 99% CPU for a long ass time before i
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:25 ---
appears to have hung on razor2 :(
okay.. scratch the razor2 comment. i'm not 100% sure since i thought i had 'sub
dbg' changed to include pid on every line and
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2424 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:39 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3734
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:41 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.0.1 |Future
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3801
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:54 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:54 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3801
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
Summary: use of uninitialized value in spamd version 3.0.0
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
39 matches
Mail list logo