http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4005
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.0.2 |3.0.3
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-15 16:24 ---
hmm... not sure I like that. I think we may have a fix here, and I'd like to
get it in if it works...
(I'd be fine with leaving it to .3, though, if it
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 04:25:29PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Bugzilla says we can release 3.0.2 so I therefore propose we release 3.0.2.
+1 for release, all tests pass on several of my machines.
Michael
pgpzdgq3tL4V1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Parker writes:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 04:25:29PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Bugzilla says we can release 3.0.2 so I therefore propose we release 3.0.2.
+1 for release, all tests pass on several of my machines.
+1, if we're all
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Bugzilla says we can release 3.0.2 so I therefore propose we release 3.0.2.
+1!
-- sidney
http://www.sidney.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-15 18:09 ---
Is this patch expected to work on top of 3.0.1? The patch applies cleanly,
but I am getting the same errors on make test as I got in Comment #30.
I tried
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3983
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-15 18:19 ---
unfortunately, patch 2565 won't apply cleanly on 3.0.0; the earlier bits will,
but not that, because it has a dependency on 3828
--- You are receiving
Ok. Unless there are any objections I'll build the release, give the
mirrors a little time to pick it up and the announce tomorrow.
Michael
pgpz9tNzZsWg6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:50:41PM -0600, Michael Parker wrote:
Ok. Unless there are any objections I'll build the release, give the
mirrors a little time to pick it up and the announce tomorrow.
I'm -1. There was a desire, per my discussions with the Habeas people, to get
their new code into
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:41:34AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:50:41PM -0600, Michael Parker wrote:
Ok. Unless there are any objections I'll build the release, give the
mirrors a little time to pick it up and the announce tomorrow.
I'm -1. There was a desire,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4026
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-15 21:51 ---
I don't think it is sensible to split into two bugs. What is missing in the
original case are just the logging lines, so depending on whether you syslog or
do a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3998
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.0.3
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3981
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-16 07:38 ---
Subject: Re: spamd chews up all available swapspace after a time
I have removed the 80 MB whitelist, yes it was global. Will let you know
what happens...
SpamAssassin 3.0.2 is released! 3.0.2 contains some important
bugfixes, and is recommended.
Highlights:
- Detect legitimate SMTP AUTH submission, to avoid false positives on
Dynablock-style rules
- Fix URIDNSBL plugin to honor uridnsbl_max_domains config option
- Various documentation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
It's moot at this point, and I meant to vote -0.5 and not -1 BTW.
I wanted more of a I'd rather not yet versus NFW. It was more of
a shock of nothing at all for weeks about a release, then suddenly,
the one night I'm not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: felicity
Date: Wed Dec 15 22:25:05 2004
New Revision: 122529
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=122529
Log:
got a syntax error doing reporting. also, no point in doing regexp since
we're
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-16 13:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=2569)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2569action=view)
truss output for child process
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-16 13:43 ---
The attached files were created by starting spamd with --max-conn-per-child=1,
then sending a single message, causing one of the children to become a zombie.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-16 13:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=2568)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2568action=view)
truss output for parent process
gzipped for length
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-16 14:40 ---
hmm, no sign of the child exiting in that truss output. in fact, the child
truss output looks very incomplete -- it reads the passwd and spwd files, then
does no
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3949
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-16 14:45 ---
I have hand applied these patches to 3.0.2 and have generated a patch file.
Is anyone interested in having that patch? If so, I could attach it to this
bug. The
22 matches
Mail list logo
