[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
ah, I didn't post examples of what the new formatting looks like --
here it is in report_safe 1:
The example I posted *was* report_safe 1, so the new formatting does
not look like that at all.
Now, I can't find any agreement in bugzilla that those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
ah, I didn't post examples of what the new formatting looks like --
here it is in report_safe 1:
The example I posted *was* report_safe 1, so the new formatting does
not look
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 12:43:52PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
OK -- I'm happy to go for:
- relax the description limit to allow 2-line descs
- keep 22-char limit on rulenames
- except for T_-prefix names
--lint should really be treating these limits as suggestions, not
errors.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:53:51PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
Sure. IIRC, 22 was somewhat arbitrary, but worked well given the
maximum length of lines and length of most descriptions.
As I recall, it was 22 for rule name, plus 50 for description == 72. Add in
another couple for spacing, the
