In light of that info,
+1
-Original Message-
From: Tim Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:37 AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0
Our experience with our customer base indicates that MSVC 7.0
Sebor
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 10:39 AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0
Farid Zaripov wrote:
For now we are supporting four versions of the MSVC starting from
7.0.
The MSVC 7.0 doesn't supports the modern C++ features and I propose
AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] discontinue supporting of the MSVC 7.0
Farid Zaripov wrote:
For now we are supporting four versions of the MSVC starting from
7.0.
The MSVC 7.0 doesn't supports the modern C++ features and I propose to
discontinue supporting of this compiler
Martin Sebor wrote:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
For now we are supporting four versions of the MSVC starting from 7.0.
The MSVC 7.0 doesn't supports the modern C++ features and I propose
to discontinue supporting of this compiler in stdcxx 4.3 version.
Everyone is encouraged to vote, including
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tim Adams wrote:
Our experience with our customer base indicates that MSVC 7.0 was
abandoned quickly in favor of 7.1.
FWIW - that same generation, VS.NET's C++.NET implementation model
was completely abandoned and restructured in VS.2005 (a massively
better
Martin Sebor wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
With MS awakening to the significance of free compilers on every
real operating system, they've blinked, and made that headache
dissolve for us.
Now if they would only awaken to the importance of standards like
C99 and POSIX they would make an
Farid Zaripov-2 wrote:
For now we are supporting four versions of the MSVC starting from 7.0.
The MSVC 7.0 doesn't supports the modern C++ features and I propose
to discontinue supporting of this compiler in stdcxx 4.3 version.
Everyone is encouraged to vote, including
