Anyone wish to add anything? Is the project dead and attic
bound, or is it not?
On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Stefan Teleman stefan.tele...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
lately and
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
and reading :)
On 04/15/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
and reading :)
Should we all respond :)
Cheers
--
^TM
Pong
On 4/15/13 10:35 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
and reading :)
On 04/15/13 09:35, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
lately and just pinging to see who's still watching
and reading :)
Still here.
Still watching.
On 15 Apr 2013, at 4:36 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
If possible ;)
On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/15/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet
lately and just pinging to
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:16 AM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tuple status
Eric Lemings wrote:
...
I agree though: there is a lot of duplication and if it were
Eric Lemings wrote:
[...]
...
Without the cast, the argument type passed to the internal ctor is
still `std::tuple_TypesT...' and, because of the template ctors,
the compiler would therefore bind to the templated copy ctor wisely
deeming this ctor a better fit.
Would this be prevented by
Eric Lemings wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:08 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tuple status
Eric Lemings wrote:
I got this problem fixed with my latest change.
The tuple
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:08 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tuple status
...
c) in ctor initializer lists spanning multiple lines, please
avoid dropping the colon
-
From: Eric Lemings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 4:42 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tuple status
Committed.
Note, there is still a problem with using reference wrappers with
make_tuple() which I'm currently working on but I didn't want
to hold up
Just a brief status on tuple progress.
I got the remaining portions of tuple (except the tie() function) work
late Friday. I did a personal code review over the weekend and am
applying some cleanup and other finishing touches. Should be checking
in a lot of changes later today. So just
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm getting compilation errors with gcc 4.3. Is the implementation
supposed to be stable at this point with any compiler or are there
still some major issues?
I just did a sync of 4.3.x and a build with CXXFLAGS=-std=gnu++0x
-D_RWSTD_EXT_CXX_0X and
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 3:31 PM
To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org
Subject: Re: status of type_traits with gcc
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
I'm getting compilation errors with gcc
14 matches
Mail list logo
