DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26322] - WebLogic hot-deploy breaks Tiles; TilesRequestProcessor is not serializable

2004-06-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26322. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Struts 1.2.1 release?

2004-06-07 Thread Ted Husted
We really should be making releases every few weeks anyway. So, we can roll a release now and again when the new dependencies become availability. I'm very much opposed to making sweeping dependency changes *before* releasing what we already have. Been there, done that, didn't like it, and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29429] New: - allow '_' (underscore) in validwhen identifier

2004-06-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29429. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Struts Web Services Enablement Project

2004-06-07 Thread Ted Husted
I'd suggest sticking to your original vision, Frank, and first do the simplest thing that can possibly work. Try it for 1.2.x as well as for the Struts-Chain request processor that is slated for 1.3.x, to be sure the approach will be forwardly compatible, and get it out there where people can

Re: Struts Web Services Enablement Project

2004-06-07 Thread Frank Zammetti
That's exactly what my approach is now Ted. But, I've been seeing a lot of suggestions that I think would move this thing to the next level of complexity, and I didn't want to seem like I was ignoring anyone by continuing what I'm doing. I'm definitely listening to what everyone has to say

Re: Struts Web Services Enablement Project

2004-06-07 Thread Don Brown
What about starting a sub-project on struts.sf.net? Let the features and stability mature, then if people are using it, talk about migrating it to be a sub-project for Struts. Don Frank Zammetti wrote: That's exactly what my approach is now Ted. But, I've been seeing a lot of suggestions

Re: Struts Web Services Enablement Project

2004-06-07 Thread Frank Zammetti
I'm looking at that now Don. Seems like that might be a good way to go. Thanks for making me aware of it! Frank From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts Web Services Enablement Project

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27089] - doubleRange missing from validator-rules.xml

2004-06-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29004] - ActionValidatorForms cause badly formed validator javascript

2004-06-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29004. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27089] - doubleRange missing from validator-rules.xml

2004-06-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17583] - Handling parameters from MultipartRequestWrapper

2004-06-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17583. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17583] - Handling parameters from MultipartRequestWrapper

2004-06-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17583. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27089] - doubleRange missing from validator-rules.xml

2004-06-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.