On 5/8/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tonight I'll review the issues and changes since 1.3.3 and deploy
snapshots of 1.3.4. Assuming there are no major issues outstanding,
I'm planning on rolling the 1.3.4 test build on Tuesday evening.
The snapshots are available:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13
The comment on the change is:
Change notes to reference Validator 1.3.0
On 5/8/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote under the [ANN]
... Action 2 .. thread:
Yeah, I hadn't done that previously as I'm not sure my poor server
could handle the load, and the fact ASF infrastructure is balking at
running a live Confluence doesn't add confidence :)
If a Confluence
On 5/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mrdon
Date: Sat May 6 19:32:25 2006
New Revision: 400385
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=400385view=rev
Log:
Starting to synchronizing the Maven 2 build with Struts Action 1,
keeping the Ant build in sync
I think
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The jar manifests now have 'Apache Struts Action 1 Framework' as the
Specification-Title. (Change struts/action/pom.xml if you prefer
something else.)
The more I think about it, the more I don't like this title. I think it
should be: Apache Struts Action. Action 2 should
On 5/9/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The jar manifests now have 'Apache Struts Action 1 Framework' as the
Specification-Title. (Change struts/action/pom.xml if you prefer
something else.)
The more I think about it, the more I don't like this title.
Me too.
I
In the documentation, we've been referring to Struts Action Framework
2 to correlate with the common acronym SAF2.
I would agreed that there's no obvious reason to retrofit the numeral to SAF.
-Ted.
On 5/9/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The jar manifests now have
Well, I still think the Framework part is redundant, as WebWork, Wicket, JSF, or
any others that are frameworks don't feel the need to include it in their name,
but if that is what we are already doing, we might as well be consistent.
Therefore, we have Struts Action Framework and Struts
On 5/9/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the documentation, we've been referring to Struts Action Framework
2 to correlate with the common acronym SAF2.
I would agreed that there's no obvious reason to retrofit the numeral to SAF.
Based on this logic, term Java should correspond only
I've completed the API for TilesContext and added implementations for
Servlet and Portlet environments. I did it in a rather sinister way
by copying much of the WebContext code from Commons Chain. I wasn't
really sure what is the best approach for using portions of another
Apache project
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
Don't we want to learn on others' mistakes? Or this *is* a plan for
Struts, to rename SAF2 to SAF sometime?
I agree with our historical approach to this: let time decide. If Struts Action
2 is widely accepted and supplants 1 in terms of usage and developer activity,
On 5/9/06, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/9/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the documentation, we've been referring to Struts Action Framework
2 to correlate with the common acronym SAF2.
I would agreed that there's no obvious reason to retrofit the numeral to
Hi there!
I'm trying to use the new struts-action framework, version 1.3.3 with tiles
and faces. I'm following the example applications but I found possibly a bug
when rendering a struts-based FormBean.
The jsp code that I was using is as follows:
s:errors /
s:form action=/login id=login
Hi,
I've dowloaded the 1.3.4 snapshot and executed the steps in the
StrutsActionRelease134 wiki page. Everything built fine 8-) Using Java
1.5.0_06-b05 on linux.
This StrutsMaintenanceMaven wiki page does explain how to build struts
when checking it out from the repository, I suggest to add a
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by MichaelJouravlev:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/SAF1RoughSpots
--
I agree with Niall, this is more appropriate to the dev list...
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I don't see how it could be core for Commands, since Command is part
of Commons Chain and not Struts and is an interface anyway,
This was my first thought upon reading this too. I think the
interesting
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease134
--
Just opened up an issue on this (WW-1310). It will be fixed later today. Thanks
for reporting Jay.
Webwork jira (issue tracker) is at
https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Dashboard.jspa
- Original Message
From: Jay H. Hartley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent:
18 matches
Mail list logo
