[maven] Is it me, or is the ul rendering broken?

2006-07-06 Thread Ted Husted
Maybe its something with my configuration, but when I went to render the Site web pages this morning, the ul tags were causing weird side effects. After a UL tag, the next few p tags disappeared, so that the text runs together, but eventually, it righs itself, and the p tags render again. It

Re: [maven] Is it me, or is the ul rendering broken?

2006-07-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe its something with my configuration, but when I went to render the Site web pages this morning, the ul tags were causing weird side effects. After a UL tag, the next few p tags disappeared, so that the text runs together, but eventually, it

Re: [maven] Is it me, or is the ul rendering broken?

2006-07-06 Thread James Mitchell
I'm pretty sure Niall (or someone else) has already mentioned this, with a possible work-around. Sorry, it's still a bit fuzzy. Wendy? Does this ring a bell? -- James Mitchell On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Ted Husted wrote: Maybe its something with my configuration, but when I went to

Re: [maven] Is it me, or is the ul rendering broken?

2006-07-06 Thread Ted Husted
OK, I added a note to the website wiki page. -T. On 7/6/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe its something with my configuration, but when I went to render the Site web pages this morning, the ul tags were causing weird side effects.

Re: Sharing code between versions (was [jira] Created: (STR-2898) Rename Struts Action 1 to Struts 1)

2006-07-06 Thread Don Brown
I'd be fine with a shared module, as long as releases could be quicker and easier. As I've previously mentioned, Struts releases are really a pain due to lack of committer support and a broken release process, and I certainly don't want to put a roadblock in the path of a stable Struts 2.0

Re: Sharing code between versions (was [jira] Created: (STR-2898) Rename Struts Action 1 to Struts 1)

2006-07-06 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 7/6/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be fine with a shared module, as long as releases could be quicker and easier. As I've previously mentioned, Struts releases are really a pain due to lack of committer support and a broken release process, and I certainly don't want to put a

Re: [maven] Is it me, or is the ul rendering broken?

2006-07-06 Thread Niall Pemberton
There is a nasty workaround - add empty paragraphs after any lists where it seems to be a problem - one for each item in the list, for example: ul liitem 1/li liitem 2/li liitem 3/li /ul p/pp/pp/p I thought it was worth waiting to see what response the maven bug I raised

Re: [maven] Is it me, or is the ul rendering broken?

2006-07-06 Thread Ted Husted
On 7/6/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a nasty workaround - add empty paragraphs after any lists where it seems to be a problem - one for each item in the list, for example: ul liitem 1/li liitem 2/li liitem 3/li /ul p/pp/pp/p I thought it was

[struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Ted Husted
So, working on the Site docs worked well for me this morning. site:run rocks! But, Struts 1 in the afternoon, not so much :/ The site target seems to be chocking on the taglib references, and site:run seems to be saying the site target doesn't exist. My checkout is current. Is there something

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, working on the Site docs worked well for me this morning. site:run rocks! But, Struts 1 in the afternoon, not so much :/ The site target seems to be chocking on the taglib references, and site:run seems to be saying the site target doesn't

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Ted Husted
On 7/6/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update the version number for maven-site-plugin in struts1/pom.xml. It's currently at 2.0-beta-4, which must not have site:run. OK, we have joy for struts1 mvn site:run But plain old mvn site still chokes on the Taglib reference report. Any

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, we have joy for struts1 mvn site:run But plain old mvn site still chokes on the Taglib reference report. Any inklings? Guessing, without trying it: site:run works by running requests through a Filter that invokes Doxia. The taglib docs are

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/6/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, we have joy for struts1 mvn site:run But plain old mvn site still chokes on the Taglib reference report. Any inklings? Guessing, without trying it: site:run works by running requests through

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But plain old mvn site still chokes on the Taglib reference report. Any inklings? No, 'mvn site' works here from current/struts1/. Make sure you're using the latest released taglib-maven-plugin. I think -U is supposed to make it update

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Niall Pemberton
Are you running with JDK 1.4? If so try switching to JDK 1.5. Niall On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/6/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update the version number for maven-site-plugin in struts1/pom.xml. It's currently at 2.0-beta-4, which must not have site:run.

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/6/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you running with JDK 1.4? If so try switching to JDK 1.5. Thank you. :) You'd think I would remember that, considering... http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1483561group_id=93991atid=606303 -- Wendy

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Ted Husted
Yep, switching to J5 did the trick. So, is the latest S1.3.5 snapshot compiled against J5 or J4? -Ted. On 7/6/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/6/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you running with JDK 1.4? If so try switching to JDK 1.5. Thank you. :) You'd

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Ted Husted
Is site:run suppose to work with subfolders? The plain old site goal builds everything but I can't seem to browse most of the subdirectories using the run feature. The exceptions are the apidocs and faq. For soem reason, I can browse those too. But the conents of the oher subfolders is coming up

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, switching to J5 did the trick. So, is the latest S1.3.5 snapshot compiled against J5 or J4? JDK 1.5, with the compiler plugin configured to target 1.4 (in struts1/pom.xml). I'd like to get 'source' and 'target' into the manifests to

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is site:run suppose to work with subfolders? It should, but in practice I've found it doesn't work all the time. There must be some pattern, something about the pages it doesn't like. I don't see anything related in

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Ted Husted
Well, one thing site:run doesn't like is any upper case letters in folder names. If I rename userGuide to userguide, the URI works just fine. If I rename something that works, like faq, to FAQ, the URI doesn't work. I also tested filenames. Same result. Hey, Wendy, before I report this, have you

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/6/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, one thing site:run doesn't like is any upper case letters in folder names. If I rename userGuide to userguide, the URI works just fine. If I rename something that works, like faq, to FAQ, the URI doesn't work. I also tested filenames. Same

Re: [struts1] mvn site:run

2006-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
On 07/07/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't seen it on a non-Windows system, but that's because I'm on WinXP + Cygwin. :) http://www.vmware.com/products/server/ :) BTW, I just sanity checked that there wasn't a toLower or anything in there, but I'm still not prepared to rule

[s2] Taglib prefix

2006-07-06 Thread Don Brown
With the ditching of the name Struts Action Framework went our saf: taglib prefix. For the new one, I want to use simply s:, but I thought I'd run it by everyone first. Also, please review the outstanding tickets and see if any are missing, or better yet, see if any you'd be willing to fix.