On 1/18/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what happened; I see the jars/wars and poms, but no
-sources or -javadoc jars, nor any signatures:
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/struts/struts2-core/2.0.3/
Sorry, since it was a test, and
hallo guys!
I spent a lot of time trying to retrive a catalog from a struts action but i
didn't get results! :(
Following the guidelines found in the jakarta commonsChain, I did this:
defining a catalog.xml catalog.../catalog
adding a ChainListener to web.xml
defining a parameter
On 1/19/07, manunixx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hallo guys!
I spent a lot of time trying to retrive a catalog from a struts action but i
didn't get results! :(
Following the guidelines found in the jakarta commonsChain, I did this:
defining a catalog.xml catalog.../catalog
adding a ChainListener
On 1/18/07, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the possibilities I was discussing with Phil yesterday was to
implement freemarker caching on the WW side of things--just like we do
with OGNL. In WW if we're not in devMode, then I think its safe to say
that we can read the template
Do you do anything special, like extract the templates?
Are these public applications? Can we name names?
-Ted.
On 1/18/07, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been running WebWork 2 in quite a few production applications for a
couple years and have seen no related performance problems.
I've created an updated version of the Struts 2 blank application which
demonstrates the problem. You can get the updated war here:
http://www.slimeslurp.net/s2/struts2-blank.war
This includes a version of the struts2-core jar which includes some debug, as
well as a tweak to DefaultActionMapper
Obviously you picked up on my probing questions on the chat. :) Yes--we
use JSP's with FTL templates for the tags. It only recently occurred to
me that the caching would need to be different for the FTL tag templates
vs. FTL results. I like this proposal--it would keep the user from
having
Yesterday I created a project with the quickstart archetype, and after
creating the eclipse project for it, I found that the
struts-annotations jar was added to the build path(which shouldn't),
along with tools.jar, which eclipse doesn't like (duplicated reference).
regards
musachy
I've tagged, rolled, and uploaded 2.0.3 again, but the Maven sources
are not showing up in the deployment to the staging folder or in my
local repository . I don't know why the sources are not being built
for me. The steps I followed are at
*
On 1/19/07, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously you picked up on my probing questions on the chat. :) Yes--we
use JSP's with FTL templates for the tags. It only recently occurred to
me that the caching would need to be different for the FTL tag templates
vs. FTL results. I like
On 1/19/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tagged, rolled, and uploaded 2.0.3 again, but the Maven sources
are not showing up in the deployment to the staging folder or in my
local repository . I don't know why the sources are not being built
for me. The steps I followed are at
*
That seems to do it. I'll redeploy the Maven artifacts later and then
start the vote.
Thanks again, Rahul. Your posts are always helpful.
-Ted.
On 1/19/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/19/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tagged, rolled, and uploaded 2.0.3 again,
Hi there,
I just grabbed the latest struts-2.0.3-all.jar (19-Jan-2007 05:50) to start
testing some of the new features and I noticed that two files that I expected to
be in there are missing. One is META-INF/struts-tags.tld and the other is the
struts2-spring-plugin-2.0.3.jar
Do I need to get
There shouldn't be a struts-2.0.3-all.jar. Do you mean a
struts-2.0.3-all.zip?
Don
Stuart Piltch wrote:
Hi there,
I just grabbed the latest struts-2.0.3-all.jar (19-Jan-2007 05:50) to start
testing some of the new features and I noticed that two files that I expected to
be in there are
Ok, it looks like the change to move the tag annotations into core
yesterday broke the TLD generation, so the 2.0.3 jar is completely
missing the struts-tags.tld file. In addition, it seems a new one won't
generate. This absolutely has to be fixed ASAP.
Don
Don Brown wrote:
There shouldn't
Ok, I think I understand the problem and solution now. Rene removed the
generated TLD from the source code, which generally wouldn't be a
problem. As part of his change, he moved the annotations into a new
package and in the Struts 2 core module.
Unfortunately, when Ted went to build, he
wouldn't it be as good or better for someone to deploy a newer SNAPSHOT of
struts-annotation.jar so that it just gets pulled down automatically?
On 1/19/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to build the struts-annotation.jar and install it in your local
maven repository:
cd
I agree, but even then, would maven really download the newer version?
With xwork, we used to have the problem where newer snapshots wouldn't
be downloaded if the local repo has a copy.
Rene had a good idea to add a profile, much like do we do for xwork,
which will bring in the project and
Ok, cool, maybe it has been fixed. Well, I deployed the snapshot so
hopefully this doesn't happen again.
Don
Joe Germuska wrote:
On 1/19/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, but even then, would maven really download the newer version?
With xwork, we used to have the problem
Make sure you open a JIRA ticket so this doesn't fall through the
cracks, and thanks for taking to time to make it easily reproducible! :)
Don
Nate Drake wrote:
I've created an updated version of the Struts 2 blank application which
demonstrates the problem. You can get the updated war here:
On 1/19/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, cool, maybe it has been fixed. Well, I deployed the snapshot so
hopefully this doesn't happen again.
When I tried it clean, without deploying the struts-annotations
separately, it did not generate the TLD.
When I tried it clean again, with
On 1/19/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/19/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, cool, maybe it has been fixed. Well, I deployed the snapshot so
hopefully this doesn't happen again.
When I tried it clean, without deploying the struts-annotations
separately, it did not
Hello everyone. I have a small struts problem.
I have the following Action class with an attribute called 'courses'. I
then get forwarded to a .JSP page (called dispres.jsp) so that I can
display the bean. The problem is that I keep getting the message that it:
Cannot find bean courses in
So, if we're dependant on this version of struts-annotations, I'm
thinking we should tag it too. I deployed it at r498040. Just not sure
what to call it.
STRUTS_2_0_3_STRUTS-ANNOTATIONS ?
-T
On 1/19/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/19/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
From: Corvus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone. I have a small struts problem.
I have the following Action class with an attribute called 'courses'. I
then get forwarded to a .JSP page (called dispres.jsp) so that I can
display the bean. The problem is that I keep getting the message
Is the build suppose to be changing doubleselect.html and
optiontransferslect.html ?
On 1/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/site/resources/tags/doubleselect.html
URL:
Gary VanMatre wrote:
[SNIP]
request.setAttribute(courses, courses);
Try this:
request.getSession().setAttribute(courses, courses);
[SNIP]
That did it. Thanks alot.
--
View this message in context:
Is there a typical wait time between releasing a test and calling a vote
on it? 36hrs? 1 week?
Paul
Paul Benedict wrote:
The test build of Struts 1.3.6 is now available.
No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of
Struts 1.3.6 has been made, and at this time it is simply
Yeah, this is an issue with the tld generation we need to address.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
Is the build suppose to be changing doubleselect.html and
optiontransferslect.html ?
On 1/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:
Yeah, that's an interesting problem, cause would we tag all of
struts/maven? Do we tag individual projects along side the regular core
tag? They have the same 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT version.
Wendy, what's the best way to handle this?
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
So, if we're dependant on this version
VelocityTools is getting a Gump failure because we recently upgraded
our Validator tool to use the
org.struts.validator.Resources.getVarValue(Var,ServletContext,HttpServletRequest,boolean)
method (to mirror the same change in JavascriptValidatorTag).
The problem appears to be that the
On 1/19/07, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a typical wait time between releasing a test and calling a vote
on it? 36hrs? 1 week?
We usually leave a week, to give people a chance to try it out and provide
their feedback.
--
Martin Cooper
Paul
Paul Benedict wrote:
The
On 1/19/07, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm. I've been doing a lot of local development with M2 and Snapshots and
haven't noticed any problems with it grabbing new ones from the repo.
If that is happening, it's a bug in M2; it's supposed to always go look for
new snapshots unless you
On 1/19/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's an interesting problem, cause would we tag all of
struts/maven? Do we tag individual projects along side the regular core
tag? They have the same 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT version.
Wendy, what's the best way to handle this?
I'm not all that
It isn't required at runtime. It is used at compile time by the apt plugin
to generate the tld file and some html files.
musachy
On 1/19/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/19/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's an interesting problem, cause would we tag all of
On 1/19/07, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't required at runtime. It is used at compile time by the apt plugin
to generate the tld file and some html files.
Thanks. Ted, I see you just re-tagged, but this is pretty important.
The way the pom.xml now stands, anyone who
Well, I went ahead and implemented this tonight:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1661
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1417
It turns out that FreemarkerTemplateEngine.java is only used by the UI
tags. The freemarker result hooks into freemarker via the
FreemarkerManager. I
Unfortunately, I think Struts 2.0.3 needs one more try.
I've modified struts2/core/pom.xml to declare struts-annotations as a
build extension rather than a compile-time dependency [1].
In addition, struts-annotations needs to be tagged and released with a
non-snapshot version number. (And
38 matches
Mail list logo
