DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34445.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
If I forget to create an omnibus ticket for miscellaneous commits,
please feel free to create one for me. For 2.0.7, the omnibus is
WW-1767.
On 2/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: musachy
Date: Sat Feb 24 08:12:38 2007
New Revision: 511291
URL:
Tag Date
On the release notes, I've proposed a tag date of Sunday, 4 March
2007, if that works for everyone.
Issues / Roadmap
Traditionally, we have included new features in milestones so long as
changes were backwardly compatible with the immediately previous GA
API. We were just careful to
Core Plugins
This is more of a 2.1.x status item, but looking forward, do we want
to bundle so many plugins with the core, or do we want to try and cut
some of these loose somehow? Of course, there is also something to be
said for letting sleeping dogs lie.
I think we should cut some of them
On 2/25/07, Tom Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using the plugin registry for all my
documentation since I like Confluence better than the google wiki. :) I
hope no one minds.
I'd say that no one will mind. :)
There's a few parts of GoogleCode that are still quirky. I'm
There's a few parts of GoogleCode that are still quirky. I'm
disappointed that the Subversion alerts do not include the DIFFs.
We've had to resort to posting our own daily DIFFs. The immutable
issue descriptions is also awkward. But, the other sites also have
their own quirks too. It does seem
I've always noticed the difference in font between the official Struts
site and the S2 wiki. If someone will change the wiki's font size to
point 12, you will then have matching font sizes. I find the current
smaller font (11pt) to be much more difficult to read and not aligned
with the core
to be much more difficult to read and not aligned
with the core site.
me too!
Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hey you! Would you help me to
The nightly scripts seem to be out of date for struts2. The 2.0.x build
is currently building trunk and there is no nightly build for 2.0.x:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/trunk/scripts/nightly/nightly-2.0.x.sh
I'd be happy to update the scripts if someone could enlighten me on
The Struts 1.3.7 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/1.x/userGuide/release-notes.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.7/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.7/m2-staging-repository/
If you have
The step by step that is being followed is here,
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-distribution.html
which includes using the release profile. I don't know why it isn't
working for me.
My PuTTY SSL setup is fine now, but there is still something wrong
with Cygwin,
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I signed the struts2-core-2.0.6.jar by hand and
uploaded it.
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/struts/struts2-core/2.0.6/
If someone could verify that this is correct, that
would be helpful.
The 2.0.6 JAR MD5 sig is
On 2/25/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I might have to step away from the release manager role. Or,
at least the deployment of the Maven artifacts. I have a lot of
trouble getting the Maven signing plugins or scripts to work. Signing
all these Maven artifacts by hand is not
On 2/25/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for, the signatures really need to come from the person who built the
jars.
Statements like that never made sense to me. The bits should be
deterministic. If we build from the same tag, we should get the same
binaries. Why can't any other
On 2/25/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prior to the gpg plugin being available I used a script to recursively
sign the jars in my local repo, and then upload the signatures. I
think Paul just used it for the Struts 1.3.7 signatures. It's a bash
shell script (I use Cygwin), but
It's a great script. I highly recommend it.
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 2/25/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I might have to step away from the release manager role. Or,
at least the deployment of the Maven artifacts. I have a lot of
trouble getting the Maven signing plugins or
On 2/25/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, _that_ was certainly not my intent! You shouldn't have to sign
them by hand -- there are far too many of them to make that a
reasonable requirement.
Actually, I do have the asc files in my local repository, with a
timestamp that indicates
Ted,
From my personal deployment experience, the ASC files never get
deployed automatically. I always have to FTP them over. It's a little
bit of a hassle to do it for 9 sub-projects, but 2.x has much much more.
I'd like to find a way to upload them all with a command.
Paul
Ted Husted
On 2/25/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you have time, please post a message with the error you get about
ssh keys so we can try to sort it out.
There's no error. It just prompts me for a password, but PuTTY doesn't.
I have the .ssh directory and known hosts file in my XP home
On 2/25/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I do have the asc files in my local repository, with a
timestamp that indicates taht they were created when I released and
deployed the Maven artifacts. So the question is why where only these
files left behind?
That would happen if you
On 2/25/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/25/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I do have the asc files in my local repository, with a
timestamp that indicates taht they were created when I released and
deployed the Maven artifacts. So the question is why where only
On 2/25/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you specify the exact steps that we should be following then?
I added a TODO to review steps 5 and 6 on the wiki page. You
mentioned March 4th for Struts 2.0.7, so that gives me a few days.
(I'd like to see Struts start using the release
It should be noted, Wendy was kind enough after 1.3.6 to add a release
profile to run the GPG plugin. But I forgot about it and did the 1.3.7
deployment of the signing by hand :-) Silly me for not remembering!
Paul
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 2/25/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could
Guice has come along way since we copied the source over into XWork. If
anyone would like to try out Guice with Struts 2.0.6, we've included a
plugin jar in the latest distribution:
http://google-guice.googlecode.com/files/guice-1.0rc2.zip
And instructions for using Guice with Struts 2 in the
Bob,
I see some interesting similarities to other projects. Tapestry has an
@Inject annotation, and Spring has a @Required annotation. I guess my
question is why would someone prefer Guice support over Spring? I read
the Why Guice? section, but I didn't see this question.
Paul
Bob Lee
You'll find a rough comparison to Spring in the wiki:
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/SpringComparison
Bob
On 2/25/07, Paul Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
I see some interesting similarities to other projects. Tapestry has an
@Inject annotation, and Spring has a @Required
26 matches
Mail list logo
