Re: [s2] Proposal: Rest Plugin

2007-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
On 10/21/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The rest plugin heavily depends on the current codebehind plugin, so if we are going to merge them, we should do it as soon as possible. Could someone outline what exactly the changes would look like? I'm going to get started on the RESTful

Re: [s2] Proposal: Rest Plugin

2007-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
Possible to implement the application, or clone the implementation? Personally, I'd also like to implement some of the Rails examples, though maybe not in the Apache Struts repository. (Which was the original idea behind the SourceForge site: a place to host other example applications.) -Ted.

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11 Quality

2007-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
James is tied-up, so I'm going to finish this release tonight. On 10/16/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have three (James, Rainer, and mine). James just hasn't called it. All that we need to do is move the files from /www/p.a.o/builds/struts to /www/www.apache.org/dist/struts, wait

[S2] Plugins gone wild!

2007-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
Bringing together a couple of other threads, for Struts 2.1.x (or even Struts 2.2.x), we seem to be talking about * Creating a plugin artifact, along the lines of the apps artifact, which would include all the plugins we maintain in the Struts repository * Creating a struts2-core-plugin

Re: [s2] Proposal: Rest Plugin

2007-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
On 10/21/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [2] http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/rest-plugin.html 100% follow Ruby on Rails-style Rest URL conventions Is there a cannonical reference as to the conventions, especially one that would be accessible to people who haven't written a Rails

Re: [s2] Proposal: Rest Plugin

2007-10-22 Thread Don Brown
I was going off the free rest pdf linked to in the documentation, but I hear it has changed slightly for 2.0. Don On 10/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/21/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [2] http://cwiki.apache.org/S2PLUGINS/rest-plugin.html 100% follow Ruby on

Re: [s2] Proposal: Rest Plugin

2007-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
The PDF link is broken now. On 10/22/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was going off the free rest pdf linked to in the documentation, but I hear it has changed slightly for 2.0. Don On 10/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/21/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [s2] Proposal: Rest Plugin

2007-10-22 Thread Don Brown
Really? I just loaded it. It is a page that has links to the english and italian versions, and the english one works at least. Don On 10/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The PDF link is broken now. On 10/22/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was going off the free rest pdf

Re: [s2] Proposal: Rest Plugin

2007-10-22 Thread Don Brown
s/Italian/German and Spanish/ On 10/22/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really? I just loaded it. It is a page that has links to the english and italian versions, and the english one works at least. Don On 10/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The PDF link is broken now.

Re: [s2] Proposal: Rest Plugin

2007-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
There must be a DNS glitch from where I am. On 10/22/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really? I just loaded it. It is a page that has links to the english and italian versions, and the english one works at least. Don On 10/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The PDF link is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge Able/Code Behind/Zero-Config/SmartURLs into view-behind specification

2007-10-22 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Sorry for the late reply. Busy happenings lately. Don Brown wrote: Hmm..I'm a bit leary about this component talk. I'd like to keep Struts 2 simple and I see the goal of this is to define a plugin that: * Builds configuration based on annotations * Defines default results when none specified

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge Able/Code Behind/Zero-Config/SmartURLs into view-behind specification

2007-10-22 Thread Brian Pontarelli
Piero Sartini wrote: Am Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2007 23:49:33 schrieb Jim Cushing: For different renderings/mimetypes, I think it'd make sense, if possible, to use a dot-extension (e.g., foo.pdf instead of foo/ pdf), since this is a common and well understood convention. Is there a

Re: [S2] Plugins gone wild!

2007-10-22 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
On Mon, October 22, 2007 6:48 am, Ted Husted wrote: Arguably, we could also include an Ajax plugin in the standard array, but I would like to explore alternatives to the Dojo plugin. I think we should maintain a Dojo plugin, just as we plan to maintain a Spring plugin, but I'd also like to try

Re: [S2] Plugins gone wild!

2007-10-22 Thread Tom Schneider
On 10/22/07, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still not 100% convinced there's a ton of benefit to this plugin frankly, other than perhaps visibility, but it's there now in any case. That how I feel too with most of the plugins I've written. I wish we could add a plugin

Re: [S2] Plugins gone wild!

2007-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
On 10/22/07, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still not 100% convinced there's a ton of benefit to this plugin frankly, other than perhaps visibility, but it's there now in any case. The benefit of the Dojo plugin isn't that it enables Dojo, but that it enables some of the Struts

Re: [S2] Plugins gone wild!

2007-10-22 Thread Piero Sartini
* Creating a struts2-core-plugin artifact that would include the plugins that are needed to write a typical Struts 2 application. I like this most :-) To have a standard way of doing things makes development a lot faster and easier. I haven't looked into yet, but we might also consider a

Re: [S2] Plugins gone wild!

2007-10-22 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Ted Husted wrote: On 10/22/07, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still not 100% convinced there's a ton of benefit to this plugin frankly, other than perhaps visibility, but it's there now in any case. The benefit of the Dojo plugin isn't that it enables Dojo, but that it enables

Re: [S2] Plugins gone wild!

2007-10-22 Thread Martin Cooper
On 10/22/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bringing together a couple of other threads, for Struts 2.1.x (or even Struts 2.2.x), we seem to be talking about * Creating a plugin artifact, along the lines of the apps artifact, which would include all the plugins we maintain in the

Re: [S2] Plugins gone wild!

2007-10-22 Thread Don Brown
It might be interesting to have several bundles: * Core - codebehind, dojo * Starter - codebehind, dojo, spring, jpa * Rest - codebehind, rest, dojo Of course, the value of this bundle concept is low for those that use Maven 2 or any other transitive dependency system. For my rest example