It's been quiet lately so I thought I'd throw something out there.
If you could give 1000 hours to the Struts 2 project, what would you do?
I would like to it become the SOA framework of choice through :
- SEO-friendly URLs become the default and users never have to think
about it again;
-
My list;
- Overhaul the AJAX plugins so that we're up to date on dojo and we have a
framework for adding other AJAX library plug-ins whilst maintaining a core
tag set.
- Overhaul message passing so that action errors and action messages could
be persisted through redirects with no user
Just one item:
- allow the use of JSTL, instead of special tags.
If it is already possible, well, forgive me :-)
Antonio
2008/3/20, Al Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My list;
- Overhaul the AJAX plugins so that we're up to date on dojo and we have a
framework for adding other AJAX library
Hi,
I'm trying to write Struts tags inside innerHTML and I get unknown runtime
error...
is there any problem to use struts tags (like html:text, html:select...) in
innerHTML???
Here is my code:
var newRow = document.all(dynamicFields).insertRow(0);
var x = xmlHttp.responseText; //Thats what I
2008/3/20, efrat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
oCell.innerHTML = '*html:text styleClass=textbox7 name=MyForm
property=dynamicField[${i}] value=/*';
Did you put html:text inside an html:form tag? I bet you did not :-)
I suggest you to use plain HTML in your case.
Antonio
1. I think you are in the wrong Mailing List - this list is for Struts
Framework Development
2. Use Other hidden DIV to prepare the Data in regular JSP then use:
oCell.innerHTML = thatDiv.innerHTML
thx
tsemach
Amdocs Ltd., MVCInfra AM
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
If you could give 1000 hours to the Struts 2 project, what would you do?
I would try to:
- Completely refactor all tags/components (it's really hard to extend
and customize) and extract them to a plugin, making it easier to drop
in a different tag library implementation.
- Simplify and
2008/3/20, Tsemach Hadad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. I think you are in the wrong Mailing List - this list is for Struts
Framework Development
Ops! Sorry I did not notice it!
Antonio
+1
in fact, i'd write a new taglibrary with just lightweight support for form
properties, conversion, and formatting. No HTML, no Ajax, no OGNL, no value stack.
Then I'd do a session of performance testing to see what the improvement was
(did somebody else suggest that?).
Antonio Petrelli
Actually, and not trying to be funny here, but ... that's available today...
jsp:getProperty name=myBean property=foo/
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/tags/11/tags11.html
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Adam Hardy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
in fact, i'd write a new taglibrary with
- Overhaul message passing so that action errors and action messages
could be persisted through redirects with no user configuration or
validation issues.
Scopes plugin works pretty well from what I've heard.
- Overhaul zero configuration to allow results to be defined at method
level
Here's my list:
- Collapse XWork into Struts
- Rewrite XWork to be a servlet workflow engine and less abstract (i.e.
remove thread locals and contexts)
- Fix nasty circular XWork injections and setter injections
- Generics
- Update all public APIs no matter how infrequently used and then hard
Here's my list:
- Create a struts2-jror-plugin that let's me develop/deploy my RoR app as a
standard Java Web Application (via JRuby)
This would allow me to deploy my apps under the corporate-approved stamp for
Struts 2 ... yet still get (almost) all the wonderful benefits of true rapid
and
My quick list:
- rewrite XWork; simpler, more flexible: annotations, generics,
classpath scanning, pluggable expression language and validation.
- take a step back, and follow a bunch of new developers to see where
the documentation is lacking.
- I don't like the ajax theme at all - it's a real
I would like to see:
- provisions for AspectJ as a replacement/alternative for/to interceptors
- +1 for native Guice/Spring support
- More flexible i18n structuring and packaging (multiple resource bundles
via configuration over convention)
- integration support for existing validation
I just saw the following comment
FreeMarker is very similar to Velocity, as both are template
languages that can be used outside of a Servlet container. The
framework utilizes FreeMarker because FreeMarker has better error
reporting. However, both are good alternatives to JSP.
on this page:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I just saw the following comment
FreeMarker is very similar to Velocity, as both are template
languages that can be used outside of a Servlet container. The
framework utilizes FreeMarker because FreeMarker has better error
reporting. However, both are good alternatives to
17 matches
Mail list logo
