Al Sutton wrote:
Now I've got to work out why I'm getting the following error in sitemesh;
I think I saw similar exceptions from sitemesh when an earlier component
dumped an exception into the stream in a non-valid xml manner. My first
suggestion would be to turn off sitemesh and see if a
Dale Newfield wrote:
A previous example has a three
character solution: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2383 ,
for this one it appears that a single ! may be sufficient.
Excerpted from
http://freemarker.org/docs/dgui_template_exp.html#dgui_template_exp_missing_default
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
Should we declare Struts 1 dead? Do we have three PMC members who are
still willing to support further releases of it?
That's a loaded question... do we have even three *PEOPLE* still willing
to support further releases of S1? :)
Does that mean
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
my feeling is that until a project deprecates a release, then
no, there would be no expiration. Anyone who +1'd a release is implying
they are willing to support it until it's officially deprecated.
Do we ever deprecate any releases except non-current patch-level
Martin Cooper wrote:
So you're saying that if a non-committer thinks a release looks OK,
...
the appropriate thing to do would be to vote +0
I think that's a great idea -- I'm much more likely to feel comfortable
offering a vote as just a community member now that I realize +0 (or
-0 as
Meanwhile, Ted has been busy applying patches. Thanks, Ted! It's
rewarding to see one's suggestions/contributions applied!
-Dale
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Newton wrote:
--- Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh, that was the no-so-subtle hint :)
Oh, I get it now. I'm kinda slow today.
*Simpsons-esque I will create tickets for bug fixes and enhancements
chalkboard scrawling*
It's my fault for being slow. I'm still working through the
Dave Newton wrote:
Meh; it's better than it was; for now I'd just as soon leave it just to make
sure *something* gets fixed about it, just in case nobody has a chance to do
anything with it. I'll back it out if you're dead set, though.
There's no impending release, so I guess it doesn't matter
Tom Schneider wrote:
You know, I think you're right! I searched the entire codebase (both xwork
and struts) and I have found nowhere where we call destroy() on the
interceptors. I guess that hasn't been an issue because if the destroy
isn't being called, no big deal because your usually
Dale Newfield wrote:
Dale Newfield wrote:
But are commas url friendly? I.E.: Is this bad?
http://mymachine/myapp/users/friendOf/amy,joe/attendedEvent/BobsBirthday.html
I think http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt says that this is OK.
As part of getting this working I wound up building
Don Brown wrote:
1. A new property/constant titled 'struts.restrictToDeclaredMethod'
that will instruct the ActionConfig (where the allowedMethods property
lives) to only allow the method that is explicitly defined (defaults
to 'execute'). If false, all methods will be allowed.
2. A new
Moved from user list.
Dale Newfield wrote:
?method:MY_METHOD_NAME
Is there any way to restrict which methods are valid there, or to
turn this capability off?
Reading the source
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/dispatcher/mapper
Matt Raible wrote:
The Roller / Struts 2 BOF is on at ApacheCon!
Wednesday night, 8:30-9:30 in Room 3.
I assume it's kosher to come to this even if I'm not attending ApacheCon?
-Dale
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
?)...
...is this the type of convention where people spend the evenings out
having nice meals/drinks with colleagues, or where people spend the
evenings quietly hacking away on laptops?
-Dale Newfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe
Musachy Barroso wrote:
This could be confusing as we don't have any 2.1 release yet, but the
pages are broken right now:
Right now some of them are broken. If you make this change, there will
instead be some that are wrong (since most people referring to them will
still be using 2.0.x).
Musachy Barroso wrote:
By the way I forgot to bring this up, the compressed javascript
files(custom Dojo build) is not built using maven, currently I build
them on my machine and commit them, does anybody know how to automate
that? I added a text file with instructions to the dojo plugin along
Aram Mkhitaryan wrote:
try to specify the action like
action name=*+*
param name=first value={1}/
param name=second vlaue={2} /
this should work (check the param, I'm not sure, maybe parameter is
correct, please, check docs)
I don't know if *+* will work, but assuming it will, you have
mraible wrote:
There doesn't seem to be much activity on this as of late. Is upgrading to
OGNL 2.7 on the roadmap? I tried to upgrade 2.0.9 to use 2.7 and it didn't
work.
What didn't work? I dropped this in as a replacement a while back, and
have not found any issues...
-Dale
mraible wrote:
If I replace ognl-2.6.11.jar with ognl-2.7.jar, I get the following error
when Struts starts up:
Exception starting filter struts2
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javassist/ClassPath
Ah. Yes--there was a wrinkle: I needed to add javassist-3.4.jar as
well. I use ant, not
Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server wrote:
Make s:tabbedpanel being able to remember last selected tab using a cookie
Does this now mean that two browser windows that are part of the same
session will mess up each other's tabs?
-Dale
mraible wrote:
Are there any plans to fix OGNL's # (or provide a workaround) for JSP 2.1?
I've not tried updating to 2.1 and testing this, but under Backward
Compatibility
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2EE/jsp_21/ suggests:
Escape each instance of the #{ characters using
Dale Newfield wrote:
I've not tried...
And that's the problem right there. Even just more web research found
an answer:
http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/2006/08/05/1154706744655.html
clearly answers my question: But, to escape it with \#{ doesn't work on
Tomcat 5 and other 2.0
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
