I'm curious to know more about this.
Which google apps do use Struts2?
Thanks!
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
many of its applications,
I think thats a messsage for the users list. Can you re-post over there.
Thanks,
Al.
GF wrote:
I'm curious to know more about this.
Which google apps do use Struts2?
Thanks!
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is pretty well known that Google uses
The guys from GXP sent me the code for the GXP result:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2754
I imported a GXP plugin into the sandbox, which provides an rough
implementation of a GXP template manager to implement the tags:
Yes, I know, but since I work with IDEA in my daytime job, EAP versions
are not acceptable :)
Am Mo, 28.07.2008, 18:58, schrieb Brian Pontarelli:
IJ 8.0 has built in FTL support. EAPs are currently available.
-bp
On Jul 27, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:
I Like it very much, from
I agree, however, the pain of the piss-poor Maven 2 integration in
7.0.3 is mostly gone in 7.0.4 EAP (Selena). I think just about
everyone at Atlassian switched over to it, as you save hours in a day
not having to wait while IDEA downloads the Maven world every. single.
time.
Don
On Tue, Jul
Yeah, the 7.0.3 maven integration is still not convincing, and in that
case 7.0.x EAP is an option, should not be as risky as an 8.0 EAP.
I'm still using the maven:idea plugin most of the time, accompanied with a
build server it makes your small turnarounds often a lot faster, while
keeping all
BTW, this could really speed up our tags, as we could include a
pre-compiled(by the GXP compiler) version of the tags.
musachy
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
many of its applications, but
I looked the GXP presentation and looks good, but I have a question
related to other technology:
Is it technically possible to rewrite the theme's freemarker files
using tag files? (I believe the challenge here would be how to capture
the tag output)
I think tag files are pretty neat too.
IJ 8.0 has built in FTL support. EAPs are currently available.
-bp
On Jul 27, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:
I Like it very much, from what I can tell from a first glance. In
addition to the interesting features, it should be nice to work with
an
IDE like IDEA (which still lacks fm
Yes, for anyone unfamilar with how the Struts Tags are implemented,
the content of all three flavors of tags -- JSP, Velocity, and
Freemarker -- are, way down deep, generated from the same set of
templates. The content generated by the template is then wrapped as a
JSP tag, Velocity macro, or
Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2008 11:18:06 schrieb Ted Husted:
The proposal would use GXP to generate the same content as we do here,
so we can wrap the output as a JSP, Velocity, or Freemarker tag.
Thanks for the explanation!
So lets go one step further - would it be possible for the user to write his
I Like it very much, from what I can tell from a first glance. In
addition to the interesting features, it should be nice to work with an
IDE like IDEA (which still lacks fm support).
Al Sutton schrieb:
P.S. If you want to know more about GXP there is a history available
from
I haven't look at it in detail, but there's got to be a way to create
new elements (tags), if there isn't we will hack it and send them
the code :)
musachy
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Piero Sartini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2008 11:18:06 schrieb Ted Husted:
The
In fact, I think the call elements are exactly that:
http://gxp.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/docs/gxp-ref.html
musachy
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't look at it in detail, but there's got to be a way to create
new elements (tags), if there
Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2008 17:47:49 schrieb Musachy Barroso:
I haven't look at it in detail, but there's got to be a way to create
new elements (tags), if there isn't we will hack it and send them
the code :)
Can't wait to play with it :-)
In the meantime I will have a look at
Sounds good to me, but is it just the latest and greatest? Should we wait a
bit and get some of the other stuff ready and out in the wild?
Don Brown wrote:
It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
many of its applications, but for the view layer, they use Google
Gets my vote. GXP will have had real-world thrashing and monitoring
whereas as we've seen recently freemarkers scalability issues aren't
always found and fixed that quickly.
Al.
Don Brown wrote:
It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
many of its applications, but
P.S. If you want to know more about GXP there is a history available
from
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/07/google-xml-pages-functional-markup.html
Al Sutton wrote:
Gets my vote. GXP will have had real-world thrashing and monitoring
whereas as we've seen recently freemarkers
Sure, this wouldn't go in till at least 2.2, but just wanted to see
what others thought about it as solution to our tag problem.
Don
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:37 PM, dusty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good to me, but is it just the latest and greatest? Should we wait a
bit and get some of
2008/7/26 Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
many of its applications, but for the view layer, they use Google XML
Pages (GXP) [1], which was just opened source yesterday or so. There
is a lot to like in GXP like type safety, speed,
I like the idea.
I wonder if GPX might also be a good way to phase in a new approach
for Ajax-backed tags?
-Ted.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
many of its applications, but for the view
Looks great. +1. If they are using it with Struts and/or XWork they
have a GXP result already (hint hint to googleans: can we have it?).
musachy
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the idea.
I wonder if GPX might also be a good way to phase in a new
Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2008 16:01:08 schrieb Musachy Barroso:
Looks great. +1. If they are using it with Struts and/or XWork they
have a GXP result already (hint hint to googleans: can we have it?).
Since there is no support for JSP tags in GXP, how could the struts2 tags be
accessed in such an
--- On Sat, 7/26/08, Piero Sartini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there is no support for JSP tags in GXP, how could
the struts2 tags be accessed in such an result?
Er, I think the idea was to use GXP instead of FreeMarker for the S2 tags.
Dave
I'll send the source for our gxp result on mon.
On Jul 26, 2008 12:03 AM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
many of its applications, but for the view layer, they use Google XML
Pages (GXP) [1], which was just opened source
ahh..that's the spirit, thanks!
musachy
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll send the source for our gxp result on mon.
On Jul 26, 2008 12:03 AM, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
many
It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
many of its applications, but for the view layer, they use Google XML
Pages (GXP) [1], which was just opened source yesterday or so. There
is a lot to like in GXP like type safety, speed, correct HTML
generation, automatic support
27 matches
Mail list logo
