Chris Pratt wrote:
In the struts.xml file you can use ${} to run an OGNL expression and access
things from the Action (actually the value stack, but we're trying to keep
it simple here)
JSYK, %{} now works as expected in struts.xml.
-Dale
Good to know, thanks. When was that changed? I use 2.1.6 in my personal
project, but we're still stuck on 2.0.14 at work.
(*Chris*)
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org wrote:
Chris Pratt wrote:
In the struts.xml file you can use ${} to run an OGNL expression
in 2.1.6 I think.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Chris Pratt thechrispr...@gmail.com wrote:
Good to know, thanks. When was that changed? I use 2.1.6 in my personal
project, but we're still stuck on 2.0.14 at work.
(*Chris*)
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Dale Newfield
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141
Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test,
the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from
630,726 ms (2.6.11
(more like copied, merging code from
xwork and OGNL) a ReflectionProvider which does not need OGNL.
//all hail our new UEL overlord
musachy
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141
Ognl 2.7.3
ah..I didnt make it up after all:
http://blogs.sun.com/kchung/entry/jsr_245_mr_part_i
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah I have to look into that, it seems like the last jar in their
maven repo doesn't have the latest api. The JUEL demo now works with
2009/11/3 Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com:
I think I saw it in someone's blog but now I can't find it..did I make
this up? Anyway, I am out of pet projects, so I might just play with a
UEL plugin :)
Is it really necessary? Isn't it possible to let EL be used by the container?
In Tiles, in
We also have FreeMarker , Velocity and we have a lot of expression
evaluations from Struts code itself.
musachy
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Antonio Petrelli
antonio.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/3 Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com:
I think I saw it in someone's blog but now I can't
2009/11/3 Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com:
We also have FreeMarker , Velocity and we have a lot of expression
evaluations from Struts code itself.
And in this case you're right, EL at Struts-side is obligatory.
But exactly, is a bad idea to use the capability of the container to
resolve EL
I still think that the simplest approach is still to do nothing except
for EL and let the view technology do it all (JSP, FTL, VM, etc.). The
only time you need anything remotely similar to EL is for getting and
setting values out of beans. This is generally not EL handling, but
basic
That would be ok except for one thing: the value stack. To support the
value stack in those view technologies is the problem. I have tried so
many things, and failed in all of them that it is lame. I will finally
merge my parameters-binder branch in xwork into trunk, and see if I
can get some
It's been a while, but that is really more of an current action stack
(I call it the ActionInvocation stack). I recall that I was able to
get most of the functionality I needed into JCatapult while still
using the FTL/JSP expression languages.
-bp
On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Musachy
The parameters binder branch is now merged into xwork trunk (manual
merge thanks to svn being a PITA)(for those unaware, this contains
some experimental code to set parameters in the actions without using
OGNL directly, it is faster, and more secure) . Now we can start
playing with other ELs
2009/11/3 Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com:
Well yes, that's by default, but with the new EL api you can plugin a
new EL resolver like:
JspApplicationContext jspApplicationContext =
JspFactory.getDefaultFactory().getJspApplicationContext(servletContext);
Oops, I must not have looked close enough, I'm using OGNL 2.7.3 with
javassist-3.7.0.jar.
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris, I wanted to double check on this, are you using Ognl 2.7.3
without Javassist? I get class loading errors without
It would be sweet if javassist was optional in OGNL, specially
considering that we do not use it. I will resist the temptation to
vent my frustrations with OGNL here :) (and to fork it as well)
musachy
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Chris Pratt thechrispr...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, I must not
It would be sweeter if OGNL was optional in struts, but that topic has been
beaten to death. =8^(
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be sweet if javassist was optional in OGNL, specially
considering that we do not use it. I will resist
Actually is not as far off as it sounds. Using the parameters-binder
branch and mvel branch in xwork you get a half working showcase. I
just need to get myself to do it :)
musachy
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Chris Pratt thechrispr...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be sweeter if OGNL was optional
I know it's not as sexy, but at this point I think I'd prefer plain old JSTL
EL to work globally. It's much easier to teach my junior programmers a
single EL than have to explain where each is appropriate. But maybe that's
just me.
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Musachy Barroso
Thy are finally adding static method calls finally. I don't use any
advanced features from OGNL either, UEL would do just fine for me.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Chris Pratt thechrispr...@gmail.com wrote:
I know it's not as sexy, but at this point I think I'd prefer plain old JSTL
EL to
They've had static method calls for a long time, you just had to define them
as Functions in the TLD. Have they added something else new?
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thy are finally adding static method calls finally. I don't use any
I think I saw it in someone's blog but now I can't find it..did I make
this up? Anyway, I am out of pet projects, so I might just play with a
UEL plugin :)
musachy
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Chris Pratt thechrispr...@gmail.com wrote:
They've had static method calls for a long time, you
:06 PM, Musachy Barrosomusa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141
Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test,
the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from
630,726 ms (2.6.11) to 117,108 (2.7.3) ms, (100
2009/7/29 Rainer Hermanns herma...@aixcept.de:
thanks! I'll wait for the TextProvider problem to be fixed and then fire
up the release process. I start a new gig next week, so this will most
likely happen until/over the weekend.
I solved these problems and was able to confirm that with test,
is
ok, we can release xwork and then do the 2.1.8 release.
musachy
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Musachy Barrosomusa...@gmail.com wrote:
Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141
Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test,
the avg time spent
: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141
Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test,
the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from
630,726 ms (2.6.11) to 117,108 (2.7.3) ms, (100 threads, 2s ramp-up
period, 100 iterations) . If we are not going
+1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement
will satisfy lots of our users...
That's the reason, why xwork is not yet released :)
cheers,
Rainer
Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released.
On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org wrote:
hum..there is one minor problem, ognl 2.7.3 depends on jboss:javassist.
musachy
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Rainer Hermannsherma...@aixcept.de wrote:
+1, both make sense to wait for, cause the performance improvement
will satisfy lots of our users...
That's the reason, why xwork is not
That may be only for the compilation. I'm using it without those libraries
and haven't had any problems.
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
hum..there is one minor problem, ognl 2.7.3 depends on jboss:javassist.
musachy
On Sun, Jul 19,
that's good to hear, I haven't tried it yet without that dep.
musachy
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Chris Prattthechrispr...@gmail.com wrote:
That may be only for the compilation. I'm using it without those libraries
and haven't had any problems.
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:30
I need some maven black magic support, running mvn dependency:tree,
from apps/blank outputs:
[INFO] org.apache.struts:struts2-blank:war:2.1.8-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] +- javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:2.4:provided
[INFO] +- javax.servlet:jsp-api:jar:2.0:provided
[INFO] +-
Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141
Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test,
the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from
630,726 ms (2.6.11) to 117,108 (2.7.3) ms, (100 threads, 2s ramp-up
period, 100 iterations) . If we
Dale Newfield wrote:
Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just
upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also.
+1
Also +1, and I'll have a bit of time this week.
Dave
Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just
upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also.
+1
-Dale
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
committed. here are the tickets:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-710
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3198
Ognl 2.7.3 has a groupid of ognl instead of opensymphony.
As a side note, I just noticed that trying to get a value from the
ValueStack, whose key(or an intermediate
Sounds good. It gives rainer some more time to get xwork released.
On 7/18/09, Dale Newfield d...@newfield.org wrote:
Musachy Barroso musa...@gmail.com wrote:
With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just
upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also.
+1
-Dale
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Musachy Barrosomusa...@gmail.com wrote:
As a side note, I just noticed that trying to get a value from the
ValueStack, whose key(or an intermediate object in the expression)
does not exist is an expensive operation, because a new OgnlException
is thrown, even
I've been using ognl 2.7.2 for quite a while with no problems. But when I
saw you guys talking about 2.7.3, I decided to update my library and give it
a try, but http://www.ognl.org seems to be gone and the download page on
http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl seems to be down as well. Is there
Chris Pratt wrote:
I've been using ognl 2.7.2 for quite a while with no problems. But when I
saw you guys talking about 2.7.3, I decided to update my library and give it
a try, but http://www.ognl.org seems to be gone and the download page on
http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl seems to be down as
yup, you have to get it from maven repo,
http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/ works for me, but the download page
is empty anyway.
musachy
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Dave Newtonnewton.d...@yahoo.com wrote:
Chris Pratt wrote:
I've been using ognl 2.7.2 for quite a while with no problems.
40 matches
Mail list logo
