DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33989.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
I haven't used JSF enough to see if it fits the same pattern, but the
component-based frameworks I've used in the past have always made Tiles
unnecessary. Components are tiles.
I think that many might prefer using a component XML base technique for page
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33991.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33982.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33989.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Le Mar 12, 2005, à 3:52 PM, Mike Kienenberger a écrit :
David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is all good stuff, but I'd rather see integration with
Tiles instead of reinventing Tiles. Tiles has already covered some of
this ground and I see no reason for us to follow.
I haven't used
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33989.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
David Geary Wrote:
Perhaps, but assuming we want the same functionality that Tiles
currently provides, such as XML tile definitions, tile inheritance,
role-based tiles, controllers, etc., you're going to have to reinvent
it unless you leverage Tiles somehow. You can have layout components,
Ah, okay, I see. This capability, which essentially lets you plug
component attributes (including managed bean properties) into
components at runtime, is more fine-grained than Tiles and is certainly
JSF-specific. In fact, a while back, I had a client ask for something
like this: they wanted
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33672.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33995.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33995.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
FYI, as soon as I apply some recent patches (to remove the wrapper
class) this whole area will become a non-issue for struts-faces. In
the general case, however, it is not currently feasible to create a
wrapper that works across 2.3 and 2.4 unless you're willing to do a
little work with Java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Having the wrapper extend the HttpServletRequestWrapper (introduced in
Servlet 2.3) resolves this - just need to remove the dummy methods.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:11:04 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am just starting to play with Shale framework by
building some simple JSF/Shale web apps.
The ViewController interfaces is very nice and the its default
implemention (both in *core* framework) also!
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:27:39 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
public static Object getBean(String name) {
Over my development career, about 98% of the time I have implemented
static utility methods like this, I have been sorry later.
Inevitably, someone wants to specialize the behavior of the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:52:17 -0500, Mike Kienenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is all good stuff, but I'd rather see integration with
Tiles instead of reinventing Tiles. Tiles has already covered some of
this ground and I see no reason for
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33998.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: martinc
Date: Sun Mar 13 22:00:29 2005
New Revision: 157394
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157394
Log:
Bugzilla #33998: Fix incorrect @link syntax.
Modified:
struts/apps/trunk/examples/src/java/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator/LocaleAction.java
Author: martinc
Date: Sun Mar 13 22:00:56 2005
New Revision: 157395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157395
Log:
Bugzilla #33998: Fix incorrect @link syntax.
Modified:
struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/ActionServlet.java
Author: martinc
Date: Sun Mar 13 22:20:47 2005
New Revision: 157397
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157397
Log:
Bugzilla #33998: Fix incorrect @link syntax.
Modified:
struts/core/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/src/example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example/LocaleAction.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33998.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: martinc
Date: Sun Mar 13 22:46:22 2005
New Revision: 157398
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157398
Log:
Bugzilla #33876: Fix typos in Javadocs.
Modified:
struts/core/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/Action.java
Modified:
Author: martinc
Date: Sun Mar 13 22:46:54 2005
New Revision: 157399
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157399
Log:
Bugzilla #33876: Fix typos in Javadocs.
Modified:
struts/core/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/Action.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33876.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33511.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33672.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33999.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2005-03-13T23:59:28
Editor: EricSeynaeve
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsTraining
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTraining
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
''Trainers'':
31 matches
Mail list logo