Author: wsmoak
Date: Fri Apr 14 23:10:44 2006
New Revision: 394264
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394264view=rev
Log:
Reorganize Struts Action Core for Maven 2.
Added:
struts/action/trunk/core/src/main/
struts/action/trunk/core/src/main/java/
- copied from r394255,
Do we need to include webapp-2_2.dtd in struts-core.jar? I deleted it
as part of the reorganization [1], so only the webapp 2.3 dtd remains.
Should we include the one for 2.4 as well?
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394264view=rev
Thanks,
--
Wendy
On 4/14/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we need to include webapp-2_2.dtd in struts-core.jar? I deleted it
as part of the reorganization [1], so only the webapp 2.3 dtd remains.
Should we include the one for 2.4 as well?
We need the 2.2 DTD if Struts continues to support Servlet
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-action has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-action has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Author: tmjee
Date: Sat Apr 15 06:02:46 2006
New Revision: 394284
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394284view=rev
Log:
- fix test case failing
- commented out test case testing feature no longer exists in dojo
DatePicker
- corrected some error in datepicker.ftl parameter.dateFormat
On 4/15/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/14/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we need to include webapp-2_2.dtd in struts-core.jar? I deleted it
as part of the reorganization [1], so only the webapp 2.3 dtd remains.
Should we include the one for 2.4 as well?
Don Brown wrote:
Ian Roughley wrote:
Ok, I'll be more specific :) The tags that you use in JSP are
directly available to other view technologies (freemarker and
velocity) due to a common underlying component model. To make this
possible they have their own MVC design - using a freemarker
Author: tmjee
Date: Sat Apr 15 07:43:12 2006
New Revision: 394295
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394295view=rev
Log:
- fixed failing test case
- alter tooltip.ftl such that tooltip image id is _tt followed by number
without comma (easier to work with the test)
Modified:
Author: wsmoak
Date: Sat Apr 15 08:01:07 2006
New Revision: 394299
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394299view=rev
Log:
Remove the registration for web-app_2_2.dtd, which is no longer included in
struts-core.jar.
Modified:
Author: tmjee
Date: Sat Apr 15 08:03:27 2006
New Revision: 394300
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394300view=rev
Log:
-fix failing test case
Modified:
incubator/webwork2/action/src/test/java/org/apache/struts/action2/views/jsp/ui/HeadTagTest.java
On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should
also definitely include the 2.4 DTD, as that is now a popular platform. To
make the inclusion effective, though, we'll also want to make sure it gets
registered with the Digester that processes config files -- otherwise,
On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Separately, I'm ready (gulp!) to start moving Shale towards Maven2, and it's
recommended soure directory organizations ... as long as you
have-a-clue-about-Maven gurus promise to stand by my side and help :-).
Of course. :)
I
had a
On 4/15/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Separately, I'm ready (gulp!) to start moving Shale towards Maven2, and
it's
recommended soure directory organizations ... as long as you
have-a-clue-about-Maven gurus promise to stand
Author: tmjee
Date: Sat Apr 15 08:45:00 2006
New Revision: 394308
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394308view=rev
Log:
- fix failing test case
Modified:
incubator/webwork2/action/src/test/java/org/apache/struts/action2/views/jsp/ui/FormTagTest.java
Martin Cooper wrote:
When you build (or download) a specific profile, the dojo.js file contains
only what is defined for that profile. However, everything else is still
available. Any code that is dojo.required that is not part of the profile
will be dynamically fetched by Dojo when that
Author: tmjee
Date: Sat Apr 15 09:05:05 2006
New Revision: 394319
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394319view=rev
Log:
improve testcase code
Modified:
incubator/webwork2/action/src/test/java/org/apache/struts/action2/views/jsp/ui/FormTagTest.java
Thanks Toby for fixing these tests. I keep forgetting WebWork, even its
tags, are so well unit tested :)
Don
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tmjee
Date: Sat Apr 15 08:45:00 2006
New Revision: 394308
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394308view=rev
Log:
- fix failing test case
Hei
Wise move - Maven 2 is much preferred for many reasons. However there might
be some pitfalls with respect to dependencies - Their availability is so and
so for now, but getting better every day.
Hermod
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-action has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-action has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Author: tmjee
Date: Sat Apr 15 12:00:56 2006
New Revision: 394355
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394355view=rev
Log:
fix failed test case (runned using ant build file)
Modified:
incubator/webwork2/action/src/test/java/org/apache/struts/action2/sitegraph/SiteGraphTest.java
No problem. :-) Don actually did all the hard work of dojo component migration.
- Original Message
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 16 April, 2006 12:51:17 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r394308 - in
Not sure if this has been discussed yet, but who wants to talk about
@author tags?
I remember that I wasn't too happy when we removed them years ago,
but I didn't say anything. Over time though, I totally get the
legality of why it has to be done.
Your thoughts?
--
James Mitchell
I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of
these
artifacts (although probably two sets ... I got a suggestion to
split the
APIs that are interesting to application developers from the
internal APIs
for those extending the framework, and would like to produce two
Author: jmitchell
Date: Sat Apr 15 14:06:09 2006
New Revision: 394368
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=394368view=rev
Log:
Final cleanup
Removed:
struts/action/trunk/apps/scripting-mailreader/src/main/java/org/apache/struts/apps/mailreader/actions/
On 4/15/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig wrote
I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of
these artifacts (although probably two sets ...
Can we do this with custom assemblies?
Without trying it, I don't think so, because it's more than just
copying
are the apis with the other javadoc going to be in a separate module?
This should make it easy to produce javadoc from there, and then go on
to produce the aggregated javadoc for the others.
- Brett
On 4/16/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/15/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/15/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are the apis with the other javadoc going to be in a separate module?
This should make it easy to produce javadoc from there, and then go on
to produce the aggregated javadoc for the others.
Ideally not. It's already going to be painful to
On 4/15/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if this has been discussed yet, but who wants to talk about
@author tags?
I remember that I wasn't too happy when we removed them years ago,
but I didn't say anything. Over time though, I totally get the
legality of why it has to
It's been the policy of the Apache Struts project that we don't use
author tags
I see. I'll remove all of them when i got the time, which should be soon. :-)
- Original Message
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 16
Have you tried the form validation using DWR? It does the REAL validations on
the server side, but while you're still editing the form. Lots of validtations
are too complex to be implemented as Javascript in-browser validations, so IMO
this is a much better solution for client-side validation.
32 matches
Mail list logo
