Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-26 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Thanks to everyone involved: given the absolutely positive feedback, I went ahead and created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17181 Regards. On 25/10/18 13:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not found

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-26 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 2:09 PM Fabio Martelli wrote: > Hi Francesco. > This sounds really good! > > +1 > > Regards, > F. > > Il 25/10/18 13:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not > > found enough reasons

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-26 Thread Fabio Martelli
Hi Francesco. This sounds really good! +1 Regards, F. Il 25/10/18 13:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not found enough reasons to jump on that. Now that things seem to work quite well for several other

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-26 Thread Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro
Hi, Il 25/10/18 13:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not found enough reasons to jump on that. Now that things seem to work quite well for several other projects [2], and that we have seen few PRs coming, I am

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-26 Thread Dima Ayash
+1 It sounds good for me. Simplifying PRs is fair enough to move to gitbox.apache.org Best regards, Dima Ayash. Il 25/10/18 13:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not found enough reasons to jump on that. Now

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-26 Thread Massimiliano Perrone
+1 thanks Il 25/10/18 13:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not found enough reasons to jump on that. Now that things seem to work quite well for several other projects [2], and that we have seen few PRs coming,

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-26 Thread Matteo Alessandroni
+ 1. I definitely agree on mitrating to gitbox.apache.org. Regards, Matteo On 25/10/18 13:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not found enough reasons to jump on that. Now that things seem to work quite well for

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-26 Thread Andrea Patricelli
No objections to pass to gitbox. +1. Best regards, Andrea Il 25/10/18 13:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not found enough reasons to jump on that. Now that things seem to work quite well for several other

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 I'm now only using gitbox on other projects like Karaf. It works fine and the github integration is pretty convenient. Regards JB On 25/10/2018 13:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Hi all, > we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not > found enough reasons to

[DISCUSS] - gitbox migration / take 2

2018-10-25 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi all, we briefly discussed this item about one year ago [1], when we did not found enough reasons to jump on that. Now that things seem to work quite well for several other projects [2], and that we have seen few PRs coming, I am reconsidering this possibility. WDYT? Regards. [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration

2017-09-14 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 13/09/2017 12:44, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Here are some reasons for moving as outlined by Dan: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Gitbox-tp5782125p5782244.html I guess if we are not seeing many github PRs then there is not a huge incentive to change over. However, it's a fairly trivial

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration

2017-09-13 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Here are some reasons for moving as outlined by Dan: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Gitbox-tp5782125p5782244.html I guess if we are not seeing many github PRs then there is not a huge incentive to change over. However, it's a fairly trivial change to make. I don't have strong view either way,

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration

2017-09-13 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 13/09/2017 10:22, Andrea Patricelli wrote: Hi Colm, Il 12/09/2017 13:40, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto: Hi all, Other git-based projects at Apache, such as Apache CXF, have moved to use gitbox.apache.org. The main advantage is that the source is automatically synced with github, and

Re: [DISCUSS] - gitbox migration

2017-09-13 Thread Andrea Patricelli
Hi Colm, Il 12/09/2017 13:40, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto: Hi all, Other git-based projects at Apache, such as Apache CXF, have moved to use gitbox.apache.org. The main advantage is that the source is automatically synced with github, and hence we can push commits directly to github, thus

[DISCUSS] - gitbox migration

2017-09-12 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi all, Other git-based projects at Apache, such as Apache CXF, have moved to use gitbox.apache.org. The main advantage is that the source is automatically synced with github, and hence we can push commits directly to github, thus making merging PRs a lot easier. IMO we should also migrate...any