Gradle is becoming the standard build tool for android.
I didn't like it at first - I don't really see the point of groovy - but
it's still better than 'programming'
in ant, and you don't have to touch any XML. You can use any ant task from
gradle - best to think of it as a non-xml ant file, with
Hi Mark,
I synced from HEAD - and noticed that DefaultServlet.PUT now fails with
'403' if the resource already exists.
I'm pretty sure this used to work, and at least for webdav it's supposed to
replace the content.
Is this a bug - or intended (the problem seems to be preResourceExists()
check in
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
I synced from HEAD - and noticed that DefaultServlet.PUT now fails with
'403' if the resource already exists.
I'm pretty sure this used to work, and at least for webdav it's supposed
to replace the content
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 27/09/2012 10:09, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
I am sure that DirContext is not the right API to define resources.
At best is could be a [deprecated] view/proxy to the actual
implementation.
The only benefit I see in
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:34 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
One use for a resource API is if it provides different backends - like
Hadoop filesystem abstraction
does. Than you could serve from hdfs/db/etc, and someone
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 27/09/2012 10:09, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
I am sure that DirContext is not the right API to define
, which allows to insert managed modules (.Net) in the request
pipeline.
However, Mladen Turk pointed me to the SPDY protocol which could also be
used for server-to-server communication as a possible replacement for AJP
(which was also mentioned in the Thread SPDY support by Costin Manolache
My understanding is that the timeout is implemented in poll.c maintain() -
by scanning the socket list in C.
Why not doing the same thing in java - i.e. don't touch native code, have
all sockets 'long', and close whenever you need from java ?
Costin
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Mark Thomas
Any plan to do a release out of trunk (1.2 ) ?
interrupt() and the others seem useful.
Costin
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/05/2012 13:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
Just a quick check before I hit commit. Am I correct in thinking that
r1296944 [1]
Sorry, haven't compiled on windows in last 10 years.
I suspect the easiest path would be cygwin and gcc.
If you want to use vcc - you need to find a way to generate the project
file with the right flags. One option would be to use the CMakeLists.txt -
you'll probably need to adjust the options
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/05/2012 15:26, Costin Manolache wrote:
My understanding is that the timeout is implemented in poll.c maintain()
-
by scanning the socket list in C.
Why not doing the same thing in java - i.e. don't touch native
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/05/2012 17:52, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I am trying to build the 1.1.x native connector from trunk so I can test
the changes I plan to make to support per socket time outs. I
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/05/2012 18:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/05/2012 15:26, Costin Manolache wrote:
My understanding is that the timeout is implemented
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 05/21/2012 08:01 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
My point was that you don't need to change anything in native.
Leave APR as it is - just use '0
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi!
The SpdyProxyProtocol class (exists in trunk only) uses ajp.Constants
class:
setSoLinger(Constants.DEFAULT_CONNECTION_LINGER);
setSoTimeout(Constants.DEFAULT_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT);
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 05/08/2012 01:13 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 11:05 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
By 'unlockAccept' you mean the socket connection made
...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/05/2012 07:41, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/08/2012 08:34 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
For real pause (stop accepting connections and wait till all sessions
times out) this can be done safely by setting 10
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 05/08/2012 07:09 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
IMHO neither 'graceful shutdown' nor 'deploy' are best served by not
accepting connections:
- for 'graceful' - a number of connections will get to backlog and
timeout
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/05/2012 19:47, Costin Manolache wrote:
You may still want to accept requests for existing sessions.
Both 'graceful shutdown' and app deploy are important cases - it's just
that current 'pause()' is not that good
By 'unlockAccept' you mean the socket connection made to the acceptor to
force the accept() to unblock ? How are you getting the socket accept() to
return, my understanding was that close() or thread interrupt don't work in
all cases/VMs.
Costin
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Mladen Turk
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 05/07/2012 11:05 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
By 'unlockAccept' you mean the socket connection made to the acceptor to
force the accept() to unblock ? How are you getting the socket accept() to
return, my understanding
. That's the second option, if
compile-time dep to gpl is not ok.
The 3rd option is to have the entire spdy package outside tomcat - but keep
the hooks ( i.e. 'beforeHandshake', NpnHandler, etc ) - like I'm proposing
for tomcat7.
Costin
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.netwrote:
Mark Thomas wrote in message news:4F6F8735.3090706@apache.**org...
On 25/03/2012 17:24, Costin Manolache wrote:
For Tomcat7 I'm proposing to only add hooks: 'beforeHandshake' callback in
Handler, and an optional
:31 AM, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Gus Heck ph...@copyright.com wrote:
I just bumped into the whole concept of SPDY this morning, and it sounds
fabulous, and I'm quite happy to see that it's already underway in trunk.
I'm quite likely
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Gus Heck ph...@copyright.com wrote:
I just bumped into the whole concept of SPDY this morning, and it sounds
fabulous, and I'm quite happy to see that it's already underway in trunk.
I'm quite likely to be using a lot of development using Vaadin framework in
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists devli...@hanik.com
wrote:
On 3/15/2012 6:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/03/2012 17:42, Filip Hanik Mailing Lists wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~**fhanik/reports/servers/http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/reports/servers/
Attached
handler for nio' ( like
it is hooked in the apr protocol), and in order to use it you'll need to
download the npn-boot.
Costin
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/2/2 Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com:
Some initial patch for SPDY - using
with the NIO
connector - not sure if it's ok to add this dependency, but at least to
compare them.
( NPN == next protocol negotiation, a TLS extension required for SPDY
support )
Costin
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Mark
Speaking of thread safety, in the APR connector, when SSL is used, it may
be possible to hit some problems if read and write are called at same time
from different threads on same socket - SSL_read and SSL_write share the
same context and apparently are not safe.
I don't know if websocket allows
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/05/2012 07:30 AM, cos...@apache.org wrote:
Author: costin
Date: Mon Mar 5 06:30:17 2012
New Revision: 1296944
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1296944view=revhttp://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1296944view=rev
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/05/2012 07:30 AM, cos...@apache.org wrote:
Author: costin
Date: Mon Mar 5 06:30:17 2012
New Revision: 1296944
URL:
http://svn.apache.org
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/03/2012 17:13, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mark, what buffer size are you referring to increase for the web socket
tests to all pass?
Sorry, should have been clearer about that.
In o.a.c.websocket.MessageInbound
Thanks, I'll try it.
Costin
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/22/2012 07:22 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
I'm trying to provide a way for people to build libtcnative-2.so so
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/22/2012 06:17 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen: please let me know if you want to further review the change or
should I merge it to the branch.
Well I personally would not merge that into 1.1.x branch.
It would
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/22/2012 03:54 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
Well I personally would not merge that into 1.1.x branch.
It would be a bit weird to have 1.1.22
run 'ant download' ?
Any concerns with it ?
Costin
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 16/02/2012 01:44, Costin Manolache wrote:
That doesn't mean the application must receive the entire message as one
byte[]
or as a Stream.
You can have a very large
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 22/02/2012 16:51, Costin Manolache wrote:
First part submitted. For the second: what is the process for adding a
dependency ?
Why do you need the dependency?
Spdy requires header compression - with a pre-defined
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/22/2012 05:47 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
One thing I would appreciate help with: I would like to have an option to
statically link
openssl
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com
wrote:
2012/2/22 Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 22/02/2012 16:51, Costin Manolache wrote:
First part submitted. For the second: what
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 22/02/2012 18:41, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.com
wrote:
2012/2/22 Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Mark
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c )
included
?
Mladen is aiming for 1.1.23, so he will be releasing from the 1.1.x branch.
What's
Will do it tonight ( it's already in the trunk )
Costin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 21.02.2012 21:56, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de**
wrote:
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/21/2012 09:56 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de**
wrote:
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get
at 3:29 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/21/2012 09:56 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de**
wrote:
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 15/02/2012 03:53, Costin Manolache wrote:
Uploaded another take.
This time I'm just adding
https://github.com/costinm/tomcat/blob/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/LightHandler.java
which is just a Handler
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/15/2012 04:53 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Uploaded another take.
For non-SSL ( JIO, and apr without ssl ) - SPDY just kicks in on all
connections,
this is just a short-cut for testing. I could also define
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Processor is tied to one request/response - Spdy protocol is a
multiplexing
protocol, so one spdy connection will have 100s of Requests.
I am using Processor interface for each muxed spdy stream.
Hmm. I wonder if we
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 15/02/2012 16:11, Costin Manolache wrote:
After I submit, I'll give a try to changing SocketWrapper (non-generic,
add read/write), in the git. If you don't like it - easy to drop the
branch,
but I think it'll
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 15/02/2012 19:58, Costin Manolache wrote:
In spdy I'm using a SpdyFrame class ( spdy allow data frames to be
fragmented any
way you want by intermediary - so even if I receive a huge frame, I can
split
:37 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/02/2012 14:14, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Ok, I think your light protocol concept to group any upgraded
connections is appropriate
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/02/2012 08:29, Costin Manolache wrote:
Ok, took a bit to get the Apr polling to work and add some minimal tests.
Please take another look - in particular to
https://github.com/costinm/tomcat/blob/trunk/java/org
it looks.
Costin
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/02/2012 08:29, Costin Manolache wrote:
Ok, took a bit to get the Apr polling to work and add some minimal tests.
Please take another look - in particular to
https://github.com/costinm/tomcat/blob
).
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/02/2012 20:47, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/02/2012 08:29, Costin Manolache wrote:
Ok, took a bit to get the Apr polling to work and add
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/02/2012 06:13, cos...@apache.org wrote:
Author: costin
Date: Tue Feb 7 06:13:36 2012
New Revision: 1241356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241356view=rev
Log:
Add the new ssl methods from
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 13:54 -0800, Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi,
Some initial patch for SPDY - using the NPN SSL extension, as required
by
chrome/firefox.
I used github so
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:21 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 02/01/2012 09:59 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi,
I have a patch to the jni library, I uploaded it to github for easy
commenting:
https://github.com/costinm/**tomcat-native/commit
Hi,
I have a patch to the jni library, I uploaded it to github for easy
commenting:
https://github.com/costinm/tomcat-native/commit/5e7d4b45bfa542e4b099bfdc2bda423b9a6cc85d
Please let me know if it looks ok - I included a 'cmake' build, which can
generate a libtcnative.so with no
external
Hi,
Some initial patch for SPDY - using the NPN SSL extension, as required by
chrome/firefox.
I used github so it's easy to add comments or test:
https://github.com/costinm/tomcat/commit/e97def3314216c083cc4b68ad9731e5a94b2af28
Basic 'hello world' works in both jio and apr, looking for
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 29/01/2012 01:20, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Not complaining - it's great to add this feature, please commit it - but
I'm wondering
if a lighter
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 26/01/2012 23:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
Good news. The WebSocket implementation has reached a state where you
should be able to play with it. Receiving and sending of binary and text
data via streams/writers and messages
Hi,
I have few features mostly done - I'm looking to add them in a way that
allows Java code to detect if the
new methods are there and use them, or use the old library if needed.
What I'm trying to add:
- BIO pair mode for SSL - right now we attach to a socket, in BIO pair you
can just
I always had this question - for trunk most of the times I just submited the
change and if
anyone -1 I revert. If you feel it's going to be controversial - send a
mail first and ask for opinions. There is an automated svn commit message
that would notify anyone interested about the change.
For
Are you going to replace DirContext ?
If yes - great, but please first send a quick summary comparing your API
with the other VFS
around in apache. I think commons has few targets, including a hdfs, I
remember there are more.
If no - not sure what's the point of replacing java.io impl, I assume
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 10/15/2010 04:57 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Are you going to replace DirContext ?
If yes - great, but please first send a quick summary comparing your API
with the other VFS
around in apache. I think commons has few
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 07:57 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
I remember many years back I was arguing in favor of DirContext - pro
arguments were
it's a standard, bundled in JDK, probably more target implementations
It may be worth showing some code as well on how to start tomcat and use JMX
to configure it. Maybe in a separate post.
Costin
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Sylvain Laurent sylvain.laur...@m4x.orgwrote:
you could add a word on persistence of the JMX configuration. As far as I
understand,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 15/07/2010 15:16, Tim Funk wrote:
-0
Since the host name should be a valid dns name(ok it doesn't need to be
a valid dns name if Alias is used), choosing a default which doesn't
have a valid dns name may cause woes.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 06/16/2010 07:08 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/16/2010 12:34 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi,
There are some methods in SSLContext to create and use a new BIO. Are
there
any examples/tests for this ? I
Hi,
There are some methods in SSLContext to create and use a new BIO. Are there
any examples/tests for this ? I can't find how to attach the BIO to a
socket, it seems SSL_set_bio is never called, can't figure what
SSLContext.setBIO() does.
Costin
Not sure I understand the motivation for moving.
If you must do it - could you wait few days ? I have quite a few changes,
need to fix few tests. Almost done with the work project, will start having
20% time again this week.
On the move - mostly -1, I don't like tree fragmentation.
On May 19,
IMHO we should use the modules/ directory as a place to move stuff out
of tomcat 'core', or develop stuff that is optional and only benefits a
subset
of users. They can be included in a tomcat-all or extra download if
ready,
but they should be released independently.
Tags are pretty cheap - not
IMHO filters like securityfilter are the right solution for authentication,
users can
use them in any container and have full control over everything.
It is possible to add some hooks into tomcat so that filters like this can
fully replace the
built-in authentication, for example using 'magic'
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Felix Kurth xil...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi
I am still working on my Proposal for GSoC.
I had a closer look at the sources of org/apache/coyote and also
modules/tomcat-lite/java/org/apache/tomcat/lite/http.
Now I have more than one Idea how to achieve the
There is an implementation of SPDY client and server on
modules/tomcat-lite/java/org/apache/tomcat/lite/http/SpdyConnection - it's
the previous version, didn't have time to update it - and I won't probably
have until May, getting close to a launch.
Note that at the moment SPDY can't be fully
The question is what to use by default - yes, the spec allows you to use
either.
Closing the connection has the benefit of saving few bytes on network and
maybe few cycles on server.
Chunked has the benefit of better detecting failures - since a close could
happen for other reasons besides
+1 on switching to chunked by default.
I don't think the extra few bytes are a problem ( or few extra
objects/cycles on server ) - at least compared with not knowing if the
response was really fully sent.
Costin
2010/4/1 Óscar Frías Barranco ofr...@trabber.com
Hello.
Currently Tomcat HTTP
AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 03/11/2010 08:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/11/2010 07:52 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org
wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:10 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
You want to have each webapp served
You want to have each webapp served by a different process ?
Or even different versions of a webapp in a different process ?
Sounds very good !
Costin
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/10/2010 02:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Work directory, temp
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:10 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
You want to have each webapp served by a different process ?
Or even different versions of a webapp in a different process ?
First goal is to get rid of connectors and use
There is a servlet that dumps all JMX objects - in a strange format ( like
manifest or INI file - not hard to parse ).
Would be great ( and quite easy ) to make it also output json.
All information you want should be there - and much more. Exposing new data
is also easy.
You can also use some of
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:51 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 02/19/2010 05:19 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/19/2010 05:06 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Not a mod_proxy guru, but filtering X-header from responses should be
near
trivial based on past experience with the proxy
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:00 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 02/17/2010 10:46 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/17/2010 07:37 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen
be a bit tricky if you want to use multiple variables, but doable.
Costin
2010/2/18, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:00 AM, jean-frederic clere
jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 02/17/2010 10:46 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/16/2010 06:57 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
I think the main driver for replacing ajp is the 2-directional protocols -
and if we
replace it, why invent a new protocol and not just adopt SPDY, which has
all
we need
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/17/2010 07:37 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
The reasons I suggest using SPDY as a replacement for AJP - and supporting
SPDY
I have nothing
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/16/2010 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/02/2010 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The other thing it potentially allows is the cluster to tell the proxy
about which nodes are
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Henri Gomez henri.go...@gmail.com wrote:
Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra
code
to try out doesn't hurt :-)
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 builds,
so people can try it out.
How
Hi,
I'm still working on lite - right now my primary goal is to finish the
connector, and have it usable as part of tomcat7, along with
nio and apr connectors. The lite connector is based on nio ( could support
apr as well ), but is intended to be directly usable by
users - it supports both
Sa de Souza Signed by -
PrivaSphere AG s...@privasphere.com wrote:
Hello,
I just added the patch created by Costin Manolache to prevent the MITM
attack during re-negotiations for JSSE to our platform. I performed some
tests and at first I found the solution quite elegant. Nevertheless, when I
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Ashish Jain wrote:
4) Does this require code changes to BasicAuthenticator
FormAuthenticator,
AuthenticatorBase of tomcat.
Basic and form - no. Base - maybe.
Please provide your comment and suggestions.
My instinct
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/11/10 ma...@apache.org:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Nov 10 16:57:29 2009
New Revision: 834544
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=834544view=rev
Log:
Proposal for cve-2009-3555 work-around
:
On 11/11/2009 12:11 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
openssl s_client ...
Type R ( to renegotiate ).
Unfortunately renegotiation is handled transparently and did work quite
well...
bummer, I will see what needs to be done today.
Costin
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev
release or
switch to NIO or APR
connectors ( APR if they upgraded their openssl ).
Costin
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
devli...@hanik.com wrote:
On 11/11/2009 11:13 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Sorry for my confusion - didn't realize NIO has its own ssl
openssl s_client ...
Type R ( to renegotiate ).
Unfortunately renegotiation is handled transparently and did work quite
well...
Costin
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
devli...@hanik.com wrote:
I don't think NIO allows a renegotiation as it is today. I will have to
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/11/9 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
Summarising the information gathered so far from various channels
(thanks to Bill B., Bill W. Rainer who have done most of the actual
work to find the info below).
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/11/9 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
Summarising the information gathered so far from various channels
(thanks to Bill B., Bill
it, it depends
on having a .keystore with a 'localhost' cert, didn't find any other SSL
tests in the suite.
Forgot that you need to read() after startHandshake() - just cutpasted the
code from
JsseSupport and it worked.
Costin
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com
Right, need to invalidate as well.
The request will not be executed - how can he continue the attack ?
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net wrote:
cos...@apache.org wrote in message
news:20091110010244.4f8382388...@eris.apache.org...
Author: costin
Date:
/11/6 Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Tim Funk funk...@apache.org wrote:
I am intrigued by the idea and have similar constraints (kids+job).
My longer term interest in lite was a simpler deployment and moving
config
into scripting and out of xml
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
