Author: mturk
Date: Tue Feb 28 00:53:23 2006
New Revision: 381594
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381594view=rev
Log:
Use constants instead directly hard coded values.
No functional change.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpAprProcessor.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Feb 28 00:53:23 2006
New Revision: 381594
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381594view=rev
Log:
Use constants instead directly hard coded values.
No functional change.
Can you change your editor, or configure it properly ?
Thanks,
Rémy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38804.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38806.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38806.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb 28 05:17:46 2006
New Revision: 381651
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381651view=rev
Log:
Fixed measurement, not super accurate, but it gives a hint
Modified:
You can't compare a JSR spec to something like commons-logging, plus
there are people requesting that it's separate for practical use.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jacob Hookom wrote:
I would like to suggest splitting EL off as a separate library from
Tomcat. The EL-API is expected to rev in it's
take a look at Hyperic
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Look here
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/monitoring.html
Peter
Am 24.02.2006 um 19:22 schrieb Michael Gesundheit:
Hi,
I'm looking for any information concerning TomCat runtime
monitoring. Resources status, Memory consumption etc.
jakarta Jmeter also can monitor Tomcat's status page, so that's another
option.
peter lin
On 2/28/06, Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look here
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/monitoring.html
Peter
Am 24.02.2006 um 19:22 schrieb Michael Gesundheit:
Hi,
I'm
Hi,
Because of the critical AJP bugfix found and fixed earlier today, would
it be possible to plan releasing a new 5.5.16 build soon ?
Sorry for the trouble (once again ...).
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I think it is time to decide how the source repository is going to be
organized, with the questions being:
- how many source folders do we need (Costin wanted one, while others
like Jacob seem to want modules) ?
- do we continue to use Ant ?
- etc
Any ideas ?
Rémy
Hola,
Ant as opposed to Maven, or to something else? I like Ant...
Yoav
On 2/28/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think it is time to decide how the source repository is going to be
organized, with the questions being:
- how many source folders do we need (Costin wanted
Author: remm
Date: Tue Feb 28 08:25:07 2006
New Revision: 381691
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381691view=rev
Log:
-Changelog update.
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Re. source folders versus modules - we can have both of them, it's not
exclusive.
Single source tree makes it easy to navigate, more IDE-friendly, etc.
The build file can compile as many modules as needed - either by compiling a
subset of the tree, or by compiling the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38810.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Feb 28 09:19:50 2006
New Revision: 381713
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381713view=rev
Log:
Fix bug 38806 by retrying all workers that are
in error state.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_lb_worker.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38806.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Costin Manolache wrote:
Why would you want to change ant ???
I don't, I am asking questions.
Re. source folders versus modules - we can have both of them, it's not
exclusive.
Single source tree makes it easy to navigate, more IDE-friendly, etc.
The build file can compile as many modules as
OK, then, how does the weekend look for a Tomcat release? That'll
give everyone a few days to maybe close out some other Bugzilla
issue...
Yoav
On 2/28/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Are all the fixes for JIRA in?
Yes, it seems so. Getting production
Overall, I'm +1 on Ant (-0.5 on Maven), and +0 to a single source tree
and other consolidations / clarifications / improvements that'll make
it easier to work with Tomcat's source...
Yoav
On 2/28/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Why would you want to change
Yoav Shapira wrote:
OK, then, how does the weekend look for a Tomcat release? That'll
give everyone a few days to maybe close out some other Bugzilla
issue...
+1
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 2/28/06, Keith Wannamaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for consolidating into a single module/src folder.
maven has matured since I last looked. It seems the biggest advantages
for us would be dependency management and a common build layout. I
don't have a feel for how much work it would
The most important question IMO is 'who is going to maintain it'. For
example - AFAIK
we are the main users and maintainer of modeler, so IMO it would make
sense to move
it back into tomcat source tree.
If EL has a lot of indepenent developers who are not interested in the
rest of tomcat ( so
it
We can have maven2 dependency management without use maven2 complete.
see. http://maven.apache.org/ant-tasks.html
I thing maven is good for standard prepare/compile/test, but is heavy
to use with spezial things like the current tomcat release build. I
have heard that some go back to ant
I also check at weekend the current cluster base again my test case.
Peter
Am 28.02.2006 um 18:30 schrieb Yoav Shapira:
OK, then, how does the weekend look for a Tomcat release? That'll
give everyone a few days to maybe close out some other Bugzilla
issue...
Yoav
On 2/28/06, Remy
On 2/28/06, Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can have maven2 dependency management without use maven2 complete.
see. http://maven.apache.org/ant-tasks.html
I have no problem with using maven or similar tasks for downloading
the deps, if they
can provide the same functionality with
-Original Message-
From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:58 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: New EL - Split Off from Tomcat 6
The most important question IMO is 'who is going to maintain it'. For
example - AFAIK
we are
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb 28 10:38:31 2006
New Revision: 381732
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381732view=rev
Log:
finished the order protocol. still to do is to fix the expiration, and add in a
reset of the counter, when such happens
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22295.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22295.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb 28 10:47:46 2006
New Revision: 381740
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381740view=rev
Log:
Completed the order protocol
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/OrderInterceptor.java
-Original Message-
From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:24 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 source organisation
On 2/28/06, Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can have maven2 dependency management
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38804.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yes!
I also thing we don't use maven2.
+1 to use ant
Peter
Am 28.02.2006 um 19:49 schrieb Bill Barker:
-Original Message-
From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:24 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 source
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it is time to decide how the source repository is going to be
organized, with the questions being:
- how many source folders do we need (Costin wanted one, while others
like Jacob seem to want modules) ?
- do we continue to use Ant ?
- etc
I am +0 on any
On 2/28/06, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it is time to decide how the source repository is going to be
organized, with the questions being:
- how many source folders do we need (Costin wanted one, while others
like Jacob seem to want modules)
On 2/28/06, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 9:58 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: New EL - Split Off from Tomcat 6
The most important question IMO is 'who is
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb 28 14:26:50 2006
New Revision: 381798
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381798view=rev
Log:
Completed the fragmentation interceptor
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/groupcom/src/share/org/apache/catalina/tribes/ChannelInterceptor.java
good idea, I will refactor that.
Filip
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Of course, this is a case where you need a separate module.
IMHO it is a bad sign when you have to do this - maybe you could use a
different
package name instead of same class names, or refactor a bit so you
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Because of the critical AJP bugfix found and fixed earlier today,
would it be possible to plan releasing a new 5.5.16 build soon ?
+1... I have something not working when deploying an application with
the 5.5.15 and using trunk helps ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it is time to decide how the source repository is going to be
organized, with the questions being:
- how many source folders do we need (Costin wanted one, while others
like Jacob seem to want modules) ?
- do we continue to use Ant ?
- etc
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb 28 15:31:26 2006
New Revision: 381827
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381827view=rev
Log:
Cleaned up synchronization for the frag interceptor, only need to synchronize
on write to the map, not read.
Modified:
At this point, I don't think there's a big need to decide on these
components. From what I understand, the general opinion is to have a
src folder containing all the source, with a target that builds
everything, and then have subtargets for packaging individual components.
Yeah.
Yoav
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb 28 15:08:57 2006
New Revision: 381814
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381814view=rev
Log:
Refactored cluster1 vs cluster2
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/ClusterRuleSetFactory.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36853.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36853.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: billbarker
Date: Tue Feb 28 22:22:41 2006
New Revision: 381924
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=381924view=rev
Log:
Catch up the change log
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
47 matches
Mail list logo
