+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
I'll make a build on our Linux PPC box and make some tests.
Stay tuned
BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also
2006/8/28, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I applied some bigger changes to mod_jk. The result is available from
trunk, but also from
Henri Gomez wrote:
I'll make a build on our Linux PPC box and make some tests.
Stay tuned
BTW, a windows binary will be usefull also
I'll made them later today.
Rainer,
can you make some tomcat-connectors-1.2.19-dev.tar.gz?
Regards,
Mladen.
Build problem on SUSE SLES 9 PPC (Linux LPAR on an i5/OS)
powerpc32 ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs2-worker
checking for setsockopt in -lsocket... no
checking whether to use SO_RCVTIMEO with setsockopt()... yes
checking whether to use SO_SNDTIMEO with setsockopt()... yes
need to
Hi Henri,
there were no changes in configure between 1.2.18 and 1.2.19. The
message occurs, if
/usr/sbin/apxs2-worker -q PREFIX
doesn't work. Could you please try that?
I used the version on Solaris Sparc and 32Bit and 64Bit Linux and it
seems very strange to me, that there should be a
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer,
can you make some tomcat-connectors-1.2.19-dev.tar.gz?
Regards,
Mladen.
Hi Mladen,
isn't that what's under
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-1.2.19-437488/
The numver is the subversion revision. The contents are 1.2.19-dev with
everything like in the
Well /usr/sbin/apxs2-worker -q PREFIX didn't works (tried previously) and
got :
:~/tomcat-connectors-1.2.19-437488-src/native # /usr/sbin/apxs2-worker
-q PREFIX
apxs:Error: /usr/sbin/httpd2-worker not found or not executable.
It works with apxs2-prefork :
Rainer Jung wrote:
I don't want to make it available under /dev/dist, since it's a little
early. If a couple of people give a little feedback, I would feel more
comfortable.
You can put tarball inside your http://people.apache.org/~rjung/
It's much easier to handle tarball then doing svn
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36976.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40306.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Mon Aug 28 02:26:51 2006
New Revision: 437620
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437620view=rev
Log:
- Adjust content length fix so that it does the same as for the HTTP connector.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpAprProcessor.java
Mladen Turk wrote:
You can put tarball inside your http://people.apache.org/~rjung/
It's much easier to handle tarball then doing svn co for each platform.
Somehow I don't get the problem: the tarball was already on
people.apache.org when I sent the original message. It's in the
directory
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 as beta.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
MD5s:
apache-tomcat-4.1.34-src.tar.gz 3c6aaa47279a33d8e256af620ddaac9b
The vote will run for approximately 72 hours.
If this VOTE passes, a stability vote will
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Aug 22 09:52:29 2006
New Revision: 433689
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=433689view=rev
Log:
Prepare for cluster integration
I like that, thanks. BTW, I thought you were planning to
+1.
Yoav
On 8/27/06, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 as beta.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
MD5s:
apache-tomcat-4.1.34-src.tar.gz 3c6aaa47279a33d8e256af620ddaac9b
The vote will run for approximately 72 hours.
If
Author: jim
Date: Mon Aug 28 05:22:21 2006
New Revision: 437686
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437686view=rev
Log:
Note that FlushPackets can be a real performance dog. Provide a
little more detail on what it actually does and why.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40335.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Mon Aug 28 07:45:53 2006
New Revision: 437717
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437717view=rev
Log:
Fixed resource cache array index out of bounds exception, bug 40170
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I have created a 5.5.18 distribution located at
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/
I'm about to setup the TCK tests, servlet and JSP, to validate against
it. In the meantime feel free to play around with it.
Once we deem that it looks correct, we can setup a vote for it.
Filip
Hi,
Cool. The directory structure and signatures look good. We need to
update the release notes
(http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/v5.5.18-beta/RELEASE-NOTES) to
remove the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL section on Linux, as Bill (IIRC) pointed
out the day.
Yoav
On 8/28/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL
great, I will let the feedback gather up a little bit, (waiting for the
TCK tests to complete)
then make the adjustments
Filip
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Cool. The directory structure and signatures look good. We need to
update the release notes
On Aug 28, 2006, at 4:22 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Build problem on SUSE SLES 9 PPC (Linux LPAR on an i5/OS)
powerpc32 ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs2-worker
checking for setsockopt in -lsocket... no
checking whether to use SO_RCVTIMEO with setsockopt()... yes
checking whether to
+1
On Aug 28, 2006, at 7:14 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
+1.
Yoav
On 8/27/06, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 as beta.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
MD5s:
apache-tomcat-4.1.34-src.tar.gz
Looks like the TCK is expecting a IOException, and not a runtime jasper
exception when you have invalid TLD files is one of the errors.
---
Test FAILED. Exception thrown by forwardedresource, but was not an
instance of IOException
Type thrown:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
in hindsight I think its ok to let these slip
Probably. The first thing to check is if it's required somewhere in the
specification for that (and if it's required, well ... lol). The main
problem is that IOE is a checked exception, so there's a throws clause
Hello Filip,
In my application I used a pageContext.include which once threw a
JasperException (ServletException) while it was supposed to (according
to the spec) propagate the IOException as-is.
I noticed that setting the deployment init param in conf\web.xml to
false made it propagate the
On 8/23/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
It's not only in the 4.1.31 release, it's even in the latest stable
5.5.17. Let's change it in the next releases of 4.x and 5.x, starting
with 5.5.18 which should happen any day now.
I think the advice was
31 matches
Mail list logo
