...snip
seems quite fragile,
In what way?
if it wouldn't be more robust to do the earlier suggestion of just
having the sca binding look up the endpoint from the endpoint registry
on each invocation.
No I don't think so. In distributed environments you will *always*
have to deal with the
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
...snip
seems quite fragile,
In what way?
if it wouldn't be more robust to do the earlier suggestion of just
having the sca binding look up the endpoint from the endpoint registry
on each invocation.
No I don't
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
is simple and likely will have the same result.
The same result being that you need a strategy for dealing with errors.
Simon
I meant just fail by passing the error back up to the client instead
of trying to do
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:43 AM, ant elderantel...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
is simple and likely will have the same result.
The same result being that you need a strategy for dealing with errors.
Simon
I meant just fail
personally I'd rather...
Catch the error
look to see if the registry has a new endpoint
if it has use it
if it hasn't throw the error
However this is not a big piece of code so there is plenty of scope
for us to experiment. I would go ahead and do whatever you prefer for
the time being and at
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
personally I'd rather...
Catch the error
look to see if the registry has a new endpoint
if it has use it
if it hasn't throw the error
However this is not a big piece of code so there is plenty of scope
for us to
2009/8/27 ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com:
I've added a testcase in r808333 for using multiple nodes and having a
service node stopped and replaced with a new node running the service,
this should work but doesn't as the client node keeps using the
references for the original node. I'm wondering
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Giorgio Zoppigiorgio.zo...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/27 ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com:
I've added a testcase in r808333 for using multiple nodes and having a
service node stopped and replaced with a new node running the service,
this should work but doesn't as
Way back in the mists of time what the default binding used to do was
trap any target not found type exceptions and re-resolve the
endpoint in that case. Worked OK, easy to do and doesn't lead to a
resolution on each call.
If you catch the exception, set the EndpointReference status back to
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Way back in the mists of time what the default binding used to do was
trap any target not found type exceptions and re-resolve the
endpoint in that case. Worked OK, easy to do and doesn't lead to a
resolution on each
Nothing is throwing any target not found type exceptions. And
It's currently an AxisFault. To make this make sense in this special
binding.sca case you'll have to reinstate the binding.sca invoker [1]
to trap the exception and wrap it with something that the RuntimeWire
can spot.
Simon
[1]
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Nothing is throwing any target not found type exceptions. And
It's currently an AxisFault. To make this make sense in this special
binding.sca case you'll have to reinstate the binding.sca invoker [1]
to trap the
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:29 AM, ant elderantel...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Nothing is throwing any target not found type exceptions. And
It's currently an AxisFault. To make this make sense in this special
binding.sca
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:01 PM, ant elderantel...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:29 AM, ant elderantel...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Nothing is throwing any target not found type exceptions. And
It's
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:01 PM, ant elderantel...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:29 AM, ant elderantel...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Simon Lawssimonsl...@googlemail.com
wrote:
15 matches
Mail list logo
