Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 RC2

2009-09-30 Thread Ramkumar R
The binary distribution looks good, samples and tutorials looks good. I found that the source distribution has a file named hs_err_pid6244.log at the root which needs to be removed. On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.comwrote: Please review and vote on RC2 of

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 RC2

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Laws
Thanks Ram/Luciano I'll make RC3 directly to fix these problems. Regards Simon

Re: Binding name in the promotion case

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Laws
Hi Raymond Prior to your changes the logic is pretty dumb. After the component type build the binding URI builder takes a second pass through the hierarchy and sets non-null binding names to the reference or service name as appropriate. In your case it you've copied a binding that is already

Re: [2.x] Replicating definitions for the federated EndpointRegistry within an SCA domain

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Laws
Hi Raymond Just noticed this post from last week... Interesting thought. At the moment all the definitions in the domain are collected together into a system contribution which (in the 1.x way of thinking) would be passed to each node along with the contributions it needs to run with.

[2.x] reviewing/summarizing domain operation - was: Re: Discovery-based SCA Domain for OSGi RFC 119

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Laws
Apologies that this is a bit of a long post I''d like to review some of the (orthoganol) choices a user has to make based on what has been said on the referenced thread [1] and on what has be said elsewhere. Contributions ===

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3287) Improvements in implementation.spring module complaince with OASIS specs

2009-09-30 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
Improvements in implementation.spring module complaince with OASIS specs Key: TUSCANY-3287 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3287 Project: Tuscany

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3287) Improvements in implementation.spring module complaince with OASIS specs

2009-09-30 Thread Ramkumar Ramalingam (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ramkumar Ramalingam resolved TUSCANY-3287. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 820238 in 2.x. Improvements in

[VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 RC3

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Laws
Please review and vote on RC3 of the Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 release. The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository are available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.5.1-RC3 The release tag is at:

Re: Binding name in the promotion case

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Nash
Simon Laws wrote: Hi Raymond Prior to your changes the logic is pretty dumb. After the component type build the binding URI builder takes a second pass through the hierarchy and sets non-null binding names to the reference or service name as appropriate. In your case it you've copied a binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 RC3

2009-09-30 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote: Please review and vote on RC3 of the Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 release. The distribution artifacts, RAT reports, and Maven staging repository are available for review at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 RC3

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Laws
ok, thanks Ant ...snip One other thing missing that can be added without interrupting this vote is that the site.xml in the eclipse update site needs an associated .asc signature file. Infra have a script that scans the distribution area for missing signatures so they'll send us reminder

Re: [2.x] otest structure - again

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Laws
On my most recent 2.x svn up I notice that the OASIS team have now integrated the change to allow us to test for explicit error messages for the failure cases. This of course has the effect of making the majority of the negative tests fail. Just posting here as a heads up for now. I need some

Re: Supporting latest schemas in the cpp runtime, was: Fixing SCA cpp build

2009-09-30 Thread Bryan Aupperle
You may want to look at the C++ testcases for the 1.1 version of the Assembly specification. They can be found here: http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/sca-assembly/TestCases/#_TestCases_ and correspond exactly to the Java testcases. Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3288) Can't use non-Item type with atom Collection

2009-09-30 Thread Andrew Mak (JIRA)
Can't use non-Item type with atom Collection Key: TUSCANY-3288 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3288 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA ATOM Binding

Re: [2.x] reviewing/summarizing domain operation - was: Re: Discovery-based SCA Domain for OSGi RFC 119

2009-09-30 Thread Raymond Feng
Good summary. I have copied some of your text to the wiki page [2]. I also updated some of the diagrams at [3]. [3] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/2852380/sca-domain-node.pdf?version=2 Thanks, Raymond -- From: Simon

[2.x] failure in itest/implementation.spring

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Laws
I'm seeing... Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: class path resource [context/multiple/META-INF/spring/SpringHelloWorld-context.xml] cannot be opened because it does not exist at org.springframework.core.io.ClassPathResource.getInputStream(ClassPathResource.java:142) at

Re: [2.x] otest structure - again

2009-09-30 Thread Simon Laws
If you were to check that out the otest/newlayout directory you should get the new structure and all the latest code from OASIS. If you were to run it nearly all the negative tests will fail as we don't have the correct detailed tests recorded in the test message property file [1]. I'm just going

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 RC3

2009-09-30 Thread Raymond Feng
+1 from me. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 5:35 AM To: tuscany-dev dev@tuscany.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 RC3 Please review and vote on RC3 of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 RC3

2009-09-30 Thread Luciano Resende
+1 On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote: +1 from me. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 5:35 AM To: tuscany-dev dev@tuscany.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Simplifying our current SVN Structure

2009-09-30 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:50 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote: The current SVN layout is a bit unconventional but its been like this for years now, I don't mind much what happens with the other sub projects as they don't have many users but there's lots of people who are used to where

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-3288) Can't use non-Item type with atom Collection

2009-09-30 Thread Luciano Resende (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luciano Resende reassigned TUSCANY-3288: Assignee: Luciano Resende Can't use non-Item type with atom Collection

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA Java 1.5.1 RC3

2009-09-30 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Luciano Resende wrote: +1 On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote: +1 from me. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 5:35 AM To: tuscany-dev

Hudson build is unstable: Tuscany-2x ยป Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Spring Implementation #231

2009-09-30 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/org.apache.tuscany.sca$itest-implementation-spring/231/changes

[2.x] How To Guide Converting Tuscany extensions from 1.x to 2.x

2009-09-30 Thread Luciano Resende
While working on converting some extensions from 1.x to 2.x I documented my findings on a Converting Tuscany 1.x Extensions guide available in our 2.x wiki [1]. I Hope it turns out to be useful, please feel free to review and provide feedback. [1]