On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Raymond Fengenjoyj...@gmail.com wrote:
Following the criteria, I would be fine if we merge assembly, definitions,
policy into one module,
Done in r813673.
...ant
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Raymond Fengenjoyj...@gmail.com wrote:
Good question. This is in fact a good use case of the Tuscany and such
scenarios can help us organize the modules.
Assembly depends on policy as the assembly model references intents and
policySets from the policy model.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash reassigned TUSCANY-3269:
---
Assignee: Simon Nash
Server name incorrect in WSDL when using separate web server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754063#action_12754063
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-3267:
-
I discovered TUSCANY-2757 which describes the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash resolved TUSCANY-3164.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Increasing the sleep delay doesn't completely solve the problem. Even with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754081#action_12754081
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-3267:
-
It looks like this fix solves the problem. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash resolved TUSCANY-3267.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash resolved TUSCANY-2757.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3270:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
1.5.1 build fails with clean repo as
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have finally gotten a success build from 1.5.1 in Linux environment
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754136#action_12754136
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2942:
-
AFAICT this test is working on the current 1.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3263.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Closing this now I have a clean Linux build
itest/domainmgr-callback test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3174.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I finished making changes for this a while back but didn't mark as resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12754140#action_12754140
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3261:
-
JEE errors also being reported under
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have finally gotten a success build from 1.5.1 in Linux environment
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
Why do we need to change the package names? We should keep the packages and
simply export multiple packages.
--
From: ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 8:25 AM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: [2.x] Refactor
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tuscany-2x/org.apache.tuscany.sca$itest-distribution-calculator-rmi/212/
--
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Apache Tuscany SCA iTest Distribution
17 matches
Mail list logo