> On Jan 4, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
> But I'm
> perfectly happy to stand up in front of people and talk about technology.
+1!
Do it!
>
> Is anyone else planning to attend? Would anyone be willing to present?
>
> Thanks,
> -chris
>
On Oct 10, 2012, at 9:22 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Meanwhile, neither of you have made a contribution through this
discussion :(
It is important that Apache projects and their contributors understand
Apache policies for contributions. I'm sorry if you don't agree,
+1
On Nov 28, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, there were no complaints about the current test build that were
worth generating a new test build and delaying this (IMO), so i'm
moving on to a vote.
The test build candidate for release is still available here:
+1
(And don't end it early even w/ 3 +1s :)
geir
On Nov 30, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, Will said the new test build works for him; it is still
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0-beta3/
Please vote regarding your support for releasing this
appreciate a good reason at the least.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
(And don't end it early even w/ 3 +1s :)
geir
On Nov 30, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, Will said the new test build works for him; it is still
available
here
was over 3 days ago. The odds of what you
describe seem low, and the cost would be two separate site updates,
for which have high odds of being the greater trouble.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think that the more the merrier on things like
stuff (home page, download page, etc)
updated for every release i do. if the Tools 2.0-beta3 release
happens pretty much the same time as Engine 1.6, then i only have to
update the site once for both. saves me some headache.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED
for testing, or should we call this beta vote closed and
release the darn thing?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
we all know why
On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
and Henning for that matter, since lately i have had to resort
:)
just text to be rendered as is
geir
On Oct 6, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Byron Foster wrote:
What is this term 'schmoo' I see in the code comments? as in:
/*
* if this reference is escaped (\$foo) then we want to do one of two
* things : 1) if this is a reference in the context, then we want
Steven,
Don't judge this community by this thread - we have a long history of
constructive and positive collaborative development. Give it another
chance.
geir
On Mar 10, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Yates Family wrote:
I take my hat off to all current, previous and prospective OS
developers.
Jonathan,
Knock it off.
It's 2008. You've been unsuccessfully charging this windmill for 7 or
8 years now, and you still can't remain civil in a conversation.
Go away, please.
geir
On Mar 9, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Adrian Tarau wrote:
Jonathan,
Basic common sense?
Wait - that's not true You certainly can do scoped velocimacros...
geir
On Feb 21, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Christopher Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan,
Nathan Bubna wrote:
I'm pretty sure #local is still just in Geir's whiteboard
There was something really sucky about it, which is why I didn't move
it forward. I forget why it was bad...
geir
On Feb 20, 2008, at 5:16 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
I'm pretty sure #local is still just in Geir's whiteboard section. No
one has ever gotten it promoted out of there. I've
what if it returns something you can't iterate over? Maybe check the
return type first?
geir
On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
On 9/25/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, Nathan -- you are on a tear. Nice work.
well, i found a little time to work on some
On May 12, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Claude Brisson wrote:
Hi.
DVSL a small and simple project that slept for quite a long time
but it
can be quite handy for small XML transformation tasks. I think it
deserves at least a 1.0 release.
Me too!
Since nobody is handling this project, and since I
yeah, sorry - I have zero time right now...
On Apr 6, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
thanks. According to the current discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED], it
seems that actually all mentors must be members. As Daniel and Geir
are
currently probably pretty busy, we will
Sorry - forgot the smiley :)
geir
On Feb 10, 2007, at 8:04 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Feb 9, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Don't get too excited yet.
So, i gave up on trying to get the site plugin to generate the
index.html page with the news macro. Instead, i commented out
I fixed the group. You should be good to go. If not, bellow again...
geir
On Feb 8, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
I've made some progress with building the site. I've managed to get
maven (2.0.6-snapshot) to build the web site successfully on my local
machine with the exception of
On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
because Maven2 has issues and that's what the current site is being
built with. i've tried to get it working on my machine, but no luck
yet.
Then I'd argue this shouldn't be our
On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
On 1/30/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 30, 2007, at 11:24 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
...
As a compromise, I'd like to propose to keep the 1.5 release and
call it
Release candidate in the same way as httpd
On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:52 AM, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
Hi,
Knew I'd be unpopular the moment I hit send.
You did the right thing. This is what the oversight processes here
at the ASF are about.
Three quick notes.
1) don't think the changes are big. But I think the distro should be
On Jan 31, 2007, at 3:48 AM, Will Glass-Husain wrote:
I thought about this a little more. There's a couple things we can do
that I'd support.
(1) Figure out a way to call this release something other than
Velocity 1.5, e.g. Velocity 1.5rc1 and issue the release immediately.
Can we do this
for clarifying. The 1.6 was a typo.
geir
On 1/29/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't that redundant Velocity_1.6_BRANCH?
it's in the velocity project, in the branches directory... how
about
1.5?
[...]
Added:
velocity
can't other people build the docs?
On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:24 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hi,
quick idea: As we will not get the zone on time and I will leave at
least my mail server running and connected to the internet, I could
set
up a once daily / twice daily build on that
. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I assume we'll have another vote on the final binary?
geir
Do we need to? The code itself will not change, just some doc file,
change logs etc.
Best regards
Henning
On Jan 27, 2007, at 3:52 AM
On Jan 27, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/27/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally yes - you vote on the final software that's going to be
released, not just the concept.
snip/
Indeed. I'd also like to see velocity votes (as am catching up on ML
reading
On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Normally yes - you vote on the final software that's going to be
released, not just the concept.
At the moment, I have no clue what would actually go out the door wrt
the binary
PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Normally yes - you vote on the final software that's going to be
released, not just the concept.
At the moment, I have no clue what would actually go out the
door wrt
Isn't that redundant Velocity_1.6_BRANCH?
it's in the velocity project, in the branches directory... how about
1.5?
geir
On Jan 27, 2007, at 5:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: henning
Date: Sat Jan 27 14:39:05 2007
New Revision: 500648
URL:
What are the high points to be mentioned?
On Jan 23, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let's see... ...the first release of one of the most popular
templating engines in the java world since more than two years...
I'd say yes. We
Will Glass-Husain wrote:
Hi,
Apparently, the main example in the Texen docs in Velocity 1.4 is
broken. Geir broke it in early 2002, and Shinobu found and fixed the
problem in early 2005. So while this has been fixed for 1.5, for the
past couple of years the docs for the released version 1.4
31 matches
Mail list logo