On Jan 31, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
On 1/30/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 30, 2007, at 11:24 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
...
>
> As a compromise, I'd like to propose to keep the 1.5 release and
> call it
> "Release candidate" in the same way as httpd calls it's releases
x.y.z
> and assigns them "levels of quality" such as (Alpha) (Beta)
(Release
> Candidate) (General Availability). So this would then be
> Velocity 1.5 (Release Candidate) with probably Velocity 1.5.1
(General
> Availability) following.
No - that's confusing. 1.5 RC would be followed by 1.5 GA
eh.. only if we're talking about a vote to just re-label 1.5. if we
make changes to the distro (even for docs) and roll a new release,
We didn't release this, so it doesn't matter, IMO.
then we need a new number. since we're only talking about doc
changes, 1.5.1 seems appropriate and would be likely to get voted as
GA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]