[jira] Updated: (VELOCITY-463) Finish the docbook based documentation for Velocity 1.5

2007-01-28 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henning Schmiedehausen updated VELOCITY-463: Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5) 1.6 Won't make it.

Re: svn commit: r500834 - /velocity/engine/branches/Velocity_1.5_BRANCH/xdocs/jar-dependencies.xml

2007-01-28 Thread Will Glass-Husain
We need antlr and junit to be added to the dependencies too, right? See: xdocs/build.xml (I went through and did a pass checking this last Fall) WILL On 1/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: henning Date: Sun Jan 28 08:59:14 2007 New Revision: 500834 URL:

[VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-28 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Due to a misunderstanding in the vote procedure, we actually have to repeat the release vote, because we should vote only on really rolled releases. The candidate for the Apache Velocity 1.5 release is available from http://people.apache.org/dist/velocity/1.5/ Shall we release this code base as

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-28 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 23:25 +0100, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: [X] +1 Yes. [ ] 0 I still don't care. [ ] -1 No, because . - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-28 Thread Matthijs Lambooy
+1 Matthijs Lambooy Malcolm Edgar wrote: +1 regards Malcolm Edgar On 1/29/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Due to a misunderstanding in the vote procedure, we actually have to repeat the release vote, because we should vote only on really rolled releases. The candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity 1.5 (again, this time for real. :-) )

2007-01-28 Thread Claude Brisson
+1 This is the first valid +1 since the three previous ones where BEFORE 00:00 MET... (Ok, just jokin') Claude Le dimanche 28 janvier 2007 à 23:25 +0100, Henning Schmiedehausen a écrit : Due to a misunderstanding in the vote procedure, we actually have to repeat the release vote, because we