Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

Sebastien, I believe I have fixed both issues in openjson All should work as expected On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Sebastien wrote: > Thanks a lot Andrea, I will try to compile and test over week-end! > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

Thanks a lot Andrea, I will try to compile and test over week-end!

Re: AjaxDownload with IRequestHandler / IResourceStream

Hi, 1) often the resource stream holds some big data (e.g. byte array) and this should definitely not be held in the component tree. 2) please take a look at AjaxDownloadPage in wicket-examples, setting the file name works fine there (just tested). Have fun Sven On 07.04.2017 21:07,

Proposal to move @FunctionalInteface from IModel

Hi devs, IModel isn't an interface designed to provide a function, it's rather an interface designed to provide and manipulate (setObject and detach methods) internal state. IMO a better alternative to benefit from Java 8 features would be to move the FunctionalInterface annotation to an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

Here is my port of the last changes to wicket-7.x branch: https://github.com/bitstorm/wicket/commit/19b05a25cc579c88fb655d2405987d9e5437fc5b Honestly I don't know which is the best way to test it or the correct way to port it so I appreciate any feedback. On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:28 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

Just to be clear, https://github.com/openjson/openjson/issues/7 is about a different issue for wicket8 Both issue are related to json and to nulls - wicket-8: about not rendering null *values* properties - wicket-6/7: JSONObject#wrap does not take Object type into account and then leads to

Re: [VOTE] Proposal to remove IDetachable from IModel hierarchy

The vote is closed with: 1x Yes, remove IDetachable from IModel 7x No, keep IModel detachable So we can conclude that IModel will remain detachable. Best regards, Emond On maandag 3 april 2017 09:38:03 CEST Emond Papegaaij wrote: > Something went wrong sending this mail. I did write some more,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

The fix need to be merged into wicket7 (and wicket6?) On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Thanks a ton! > > kind regards > > Tobias > > > Am 07.04.2017 um 12:20 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > > > Hi Tobias, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

Thanks a ton! kind regards Tobias > Am 07.04.2017 um 12:20 schrieb Martin Grigorov : > > Hi Tobias, > > Maxim, Mikhail, Sebastien and Andrea already worked it out: > https://github.com/openjson/openjson/issues/7 > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

Hi Tobias, Maxim, Mikhail, Sebastien and Andrea already worked it out: https://github.com/openjson/openjson/issues/7 Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Tobias Soloschenko < tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 7.7.0

Hi all, I just don't have any time currently to take care about the JSON issue. Can someone take over it? Thanks a lot for the investigation Sebastien! kind regards Tobias > Am 04.04.2017 um 11:12 schrieb Andrea Del Bene : > > My bad, dont worry :) > >> On Tue, Apr