Thanks Edmond! This seems like the right opportunity to pick this ticket up.
I've added it to our references :) stay tuned!
On 2020/06/05 12:56:00, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> It's always nice to get some help in maintaining Wicket. Wicket has
> always been strong wrt security.
Hi Santiago,
It's always nice to get some help in maintaining Wicket. Wicket has
always been strong wrt security. That's one of the reasons why at
Topicus we use it to power our Identity and Access Management solution
called Topicus KeyHub.
Just a few weeks ago I filed the following ticket
Hello Wicket devs!
Thanks for pointing out the Jira tickets that I missed! I didn't realise that
you already have extensive CSP support. Great job on getting rid of both
unsafe-inline & unsafe-eval!
In that case, we will be shifting focus towards improving Wicket's security
through one or
Hi Santiago,
Feel free to follow Wicket dev community discussion on this subject at
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbd8b1500fff1140d136a08e35cf8c0f5cf200bf8a60b6a58204ef9a7%40%3Cdev.wicket.apache.org%3E
чт, 4 июн. 2020 г. в 21:47, Santiago Díaz :
> Hello Andrew,
>
> My name is Santiago,
>> IMO we should explain that the CSP support has been already added in 9.x
>> and to close this forgotten JIRA ticket.
>> Then if they still think there are ways to improve the current
>> implementation they are very welcome to contribute!
Martin, I did tell it first:
>> Hi Santiago.
>>
>> The
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 6:17 AM Tobias Soloschenko
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to my opinion they just want to contribute to Wicket. I would simply
> explain how the process of contribution works at ASF (PRs, etc.) and give
> them some information what challenges we were faced with till now.
>
IMO we
