Wicket 1.4.x has been branched and now lives in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x
Trunk is now what will become 1.5.0.
Trunk may be broken in the early days of development and contain a lot
of API breaks, so if you are following bleeding edge you may want to
do so on
Apologies if this is known, but is there anywhere noted the plan for
1.5?
Also, I'd like to look back at the portal events work I did, and try
and get that into 1.5. What would be the process for doing so? In
terms of making a branch, or just re-patching, or do I just need to
get the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Antony Stubbsantony.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies if this is known, but is there anywhere noted the plan for 1.5?
http://www.google.com/search?q=wicket+1.5
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-15-wish-list.html
Also, I'd like to look back at the portal
There us already a working patch since early this year. I just need to
update it to trunk which shouldn't be a big deal.
Regards,
Antony Stubbs
website: sharca.com
On 20/08/2009, at 7:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
come up with a proposal we can discuss. when we
Hi,
actually the changes in 1.5 might be quite drastic as far as wicket
internals are concerned. I've already rewritten the request cycle, url
processing and page management. I'm not sure how much of it will
actually get to trunk though. You can take a look at the code here if
you are interested:
It would be nice to get some guidance towards the goals, and
architecture of your new design before we commit to it. Just looking
at the code doesn't reveal intention or the bigger picture.
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Matej Knoppmatej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
actually the
the intention is to drastically simply the process of going from a url
to a page.
right now we have the filter-requestcycle-processor-coding
strategy-target-page. everything between the filter and the page is
very complicated. we would like to clean it up and simplify it.
our url handling is a
+100
as a side note, I work for an audio and web conferencing company, so
if at some point it would be beneficial for the developers to actually
*talk* about this over phone, or collaborate online, let me know and I
can setup an account for this. we have or can obtain numbers in quite
a few
I agree that this area could benefit from a redesign.
I specifically found it difficult when writing a RequestHandler that would
redirect request from ssl to non-ssl depending no the page type.
I.E. Login is redirected to HTTPS, then regular page redirects you back to HTTP
D/
On 8/20/09
I'll try to find some time to write an overview of the experimental
branch. But the code is an order of magnitude simpler than current
Wicket codes and about the same amount less tangled. It also does lot
less though :) (some of that is intentional).
I have basically rewritten the most messy
No.. I just finally set our pom to 1.4 and dealing with the 4,000 warnings!
I'm wondering what other folks are doing for thinks like Link(s) or simple
components that don't make use of a model.
In some cases I've just added String to make eclipse stop complaining...
I'll look into @RequireHttps,
If your component does not use model you can use Void.
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
No.. I just finally set our pom to 1.4 and dealing with the 4,000 warnings!
I'm wondering what other folks are doing for thinks like Link(s) or
Something that I've encounter that I found frustrating that might be worth
considering in the new design:
Construct a page...
Realize you need to forward to another page,
Call setResponsePage(...)
If the constructor short circuits when it realizes that the request is getting
forwarded,
Wicket
Wow.. Cool.. Thanks!
Another one that I had trouble with was ModelListMyPojo
I'm guessing cuz the compiler/ide doesn't see List as Serializable.
D/
On 8/20/09 5:57 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
If your component does not use model you can use Void.
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009
thats why we have RestartResponseException(page)
-igor
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
Something that I've encounter that I found frustrating that might be worth
considering in the new design:
Construct a page...
Realize you need to
This really isn't the right thread...
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
Wow.. Cool.. Thanks!
Another one that I had trouble with was ModelListMyPojo
I'm guessing cuz the compiler/ide doesn't see List as Serializable.
D/
On 8/20/09
Sorry.. I know.. Didn't mean for it to go there.
On 8/20/09 6:05 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
This really isn't the right thread...
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
Wow.. Cool.. Thanks!
Another one that I had trouble
It seems odd to throw an exception to control flow in a non error state, that's
why I was suggesting that you consider a different approach in 1.5
D/
On 8/20/09 6:03 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
thats why we have RestartResponseException(page)
-igor
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009
doesnt seem that weird if you want to abort the creation of an object
- that is what you want here dont you? if you know of another
construct in java that will let us do that i am all ears.
-igor
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
It seems odd to
see Model.ofList(list)
-igor
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
Wow.. Cool.. Thanks!
Another one that I had trouble with was ModelListMyPojo
I'm guessing cuz the compiler/ide doesn't see List as Serializable.
D/
On 8/20/09 5:57 PM, Matej
It isn't my constructor I'm trying to abort.
It is the wicket code that expects me to add certain objects to the page.
If I've already told it that I want to forward to another page, why should it
care that I didn't add X component to the page or the heirarchy doesn't match
D/
On 8/20/09 6:14
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
It isn't my constructor I'm trying to abort.
no? so you let it finish running after setresponsepage()?
-igor
It is the wicket code that expects me to add certain objects to the page.
If I've already told it
This is what I tried to do that would error out.
Page(){
if(condition){
setResponsePage()
}else{
//add components
}
}
On 8/20/09 6:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
looks like you are aborting the constructor to me.
-igor
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
This is what I tried to do that would error out.
Page(){
if(condition){
setResponsePage()
}else{
//add components
}
}
On
24 matches
Mail list logo
