Re: 8.0.0 blockers

> > > > >>>>>> I think it would be better to release another M or RC because > > > there > > > > >>> were > > > > >>>>>> some bigger changes lately. > > > > >>>>>> > > &g

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

02.2018 um 11:39 schrieb Andrea Del Bene < > an.delb...@gmail.com > > >: > > > >> > > > >> Another interesting source for official statements/answers is the > > > article > > > > I > > > >> linked at the bottom of this message. It contains som

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

> > > I > > >> linked at the bottom of this message. It contains some good (and > funny) > > >> critics to REST and what it promises to deliver. > > >> > > >> https://medium.freecodecamp.org/rest-is-the-new-soap-97ff6c09896d > > >> > > >> On

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

896d > >> > >> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Korbinian Bachl < > >> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Kamil, > >>> > >>> be careful when using this feature in production as there is a race > >>>

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

ork, browser and client thread count > if >>> it works or not. >>> >>> >>> >>> - Ursprüngliche Mail - >>>> Von: "Kamil Paśko" <kamil.pa...@solsoft.pl> >>>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org >>>> Gesen

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

r and client thread count if >> it works or not. >> >> >> >> - Ursprüngliche Mail - >>> Von: "Kamil Paśko" <kamil.pa...@solsoft.pl> >>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org >>> Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43 >&

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

dition meaning it depends on network, browser and client thread count if >> it works or not. >> >> >> >> - Ursprüngliche Mail - >>> Von: "Kamil Paśko" <kamil.pa...@solsoft.pl> >>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org >>> Gesende

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

r not. - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Kamil Paśko" <kamil.pa...@solsoft.pl> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43 Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers +1 I could test this "deferred javascript" issue on real application I'm for a new release

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

ian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Kamil, >>>> >>>> be careful when using this feature in production as there is a race >>>> condition meaning it depends on network, browser and client thread >>>> >>> count >> >>> if >>> >

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

if it works or not. - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Kamil Paśko" <kamil.pa...@solsoft.pl> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43 Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers +1 I could test this "deferred javascript" issue on real application I'm f

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

>> > korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote: >> > >> > > Hello Kamil, >> > > >> > > be careful when using this feature in production as there is a race >> > > condition meaning it depends on network, browser and client thread >> count >&

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

eful when using this feature in production as there is a race > > > condition meaning it depends on network, browser and client thread > count > > if > > > it works or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > > > Von: "Ka

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

ondition meaning it depends on network, browser and client thread count > if > > it works or not. > > > > > > > > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > > Von: "Kamil Paśko" <kamil.pa...@solsoft.pl> > > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > > Ges

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

;Kamil Paśko" <kamil.pa...@solsoft.pl> > > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43 > > > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I could test this "deferred javascrip

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

gliche Mail - > > Von: "Kamil Paśko" <kamil.pa...@solsoft.pl> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43 > > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > > > +1 > > > > I could test this "deferred javascript"

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

.apache.org > Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43 > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > +1 > > I could test this "deferred javascript" issue on real application > > >> I'm for a new release too. We have a lot of fixes to release also for 7.x >> branc

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 14:15:11 Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers Hi, Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and Wicket6 will be moved to "security updates only" mode

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 01.02.2018 um 17:39 schrieb Korbinian Bachl: > > > > > > > >> Im really sorry Sven but I broke your defer patch :/ > > > >> > > > >> see comment here: > > > &

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Sven but I broke your defer patch :/ > > >> > > >> see comment here: > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498 > > >> > > >> A solution to it is provided :) > > >> > > >> > > >> - Ursprün

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

> > > > > Am 01.02.2018 um 17:39 schrieb Korbinian Bachl: > > > > > >> Im really sorry Sven but I broke your defer patch :/ > > >> > > >> see comment here: > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498 > > >> > &

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

e/WICKET-6498 > >> > >> A solution to it is provided :) > >> > >> > >> - Ursprüngliche Mail - > >> > >>> Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> > >>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org > >>> Gesendet: Donner

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Ursprüngliche Mail - >> >>> Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> >>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 14:15:11 >>> Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am I right thi

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

patch :/ see comment here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498 A solution to it is provided :) - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 14:15:11 Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Thank you Maxim! And yes, 1.5 will be discontinued and Wicket 6 will be moved to "security updates only" On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello All, > > I have created wicket-8 branch in wicket-site repository. > I believe the main work should be

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Hi, > Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and Wicket6 will be moved to "security updates only" mode? Yes I think so. Sven ⁣Gesendet mit Blue ​ Am 1. Feb. 2018, 14:00, um 14:00, Maxim Solodovnik schrieb: >Hello All, > >I have created wicket-8 branch in

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Hello All, I have created wicket-8 branch in wicket-site repository. I believe the main work should be done in 2018/_posts/ 2018-02-12-wicket-8.0.0-released.md file (I optimistically "guess" release date to be 2018-02-12 :)) Weanwhile I'll update quickstart generator so it will work with

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Hi, I've updated Confluence page to elaborate an answer to "Not blocking but really important" TODOs for Wicket 8. The page is here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ToDo+before+GA+release. Please consider to work directly on my comment integrating/changing the content of my

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Just seen it :-) On 18/01/2018 20:21, Martin Grigorov wrote: https://dzone.com/articles/would-you-use-jsf-for-your-next-project This might be used for inspiration for possible questions. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: I've created a

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

https://dzone.com/articles/would-you-use-jsf-for-your-next-project This might be used for inspiration for possible questions. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > I've created a Confluence page to collect some ideas on the non-technical > tasks we

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

I've created a Confluence page to collect some ideas on the non-technical tasks we should accomplish before going to roll out Wicket 8. I've started with some personal thoughts on topic 'JS vs Wicket'. Please take them as a raw sketch, something to use for further and better exposed considerations

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Uh sorry, I'm already able to create/edit pages. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > I'd rather use Confluence but I think I don't have enough rights to create > a page. Who can grant them? > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Martin Grigorov

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

I'd rather use Confluence but I think I don't have enough rights to create a page. Who can grant them? On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > You can use JIRA for this too. > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Andrea Del Bene >

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

You can use JIRA for this too. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > Could it be a good idea to create a shared document (for example on Google > Docs) to start working on non-technical questions? > > > > Not blocking but really important: > > > > -

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Could it be a good idea to create a shared document (for example on Google Docs) to start working on non-technical questions? > Not blocking but really important: > > - have a story to answer "Why not just use XXX.js?" > - have a story to answer "Isn't Java Server Side frameworks dead?" > - have

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Good luck with Jekyll and Ruby :-D On Jan 14, 2018 11:11 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" wrote: > My bad, I have used wrong branch, now everything works as expected > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > > Just have tried to run

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

My bad, I have used wrong branch, now everything works as expected On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Just have tried to run local site using this [1] instruction > The result was empty "_site" folder and "directory listing" at >

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Just have tried to run local site using this [1] instruction The result was empty "_site" folder and "directory listing" at http://127.0.0.1:4000 What am I doing wrong? [1] http://wicket.apache.org/contribute/write.html On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Martijn Dashorst

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Maybe it worth to start the VOTE on the release and announce as soon as all "paper work" will be done? This "no technical blockers" period lasts for 1.5 months I believe we need to move forward with the release :) On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Tobias Soloschenko

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

>>> push builder support :-) kind regards Tobias > Am 10.01.2018 um 14:39 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Andrea Del Bene >> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Martijn Dashorst < >>

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Martijn Dashorst < > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> No technical blockers AFAIK, however, we really should do the marketing >> right: >> >> - front page of website should

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Martijn Dashorst < martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > No technical blockers AFAIK, however, we really should do the marketing > right: > > - front page of website should feature 8 prominently > - work with Sally from PR for a press release to let the world know

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

No technical blockers AFAIK, however, we really should do the marketing right: - front page of website should feature 8 prominently - work with Sally from PR for a press release to let the world know we are not Dead Yet™ - have a really great announcement to give to the world about all the

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

ajax and the depending on it. Its more an > adaption > >> to > >> > >>> current standards, where old IEs and other quirks in browsers > aren't > >> > >>> needed > >> > >>> anymore - so to say. > >> > >>> > >> > &g

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

needed >> > >>> anymore - so to say. >> > >>> >> > >>> Currently wicket has a real big problem with first page impression >> and >> > >>> high speed rendering on mobile devices as all JS resources are >> limited >> > by

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Currently wicket has a real big problem with first page impression > and > > >>> high speed rendering on mobile devices as all JS resources are > limited > > by > > >>> wicket in not beeing able to get deffered or even async'd. Ideally > the >

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

e to get deffered or even async'd. Ideally the > >>> wicket JS integration not only should accept defer but be built around > >>> full > >>> async into the JS part - that however would not be possible with jQuery > >>> as > >>> this one o

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

but be built around >>> full >>> async into the JS part - that however would not be possible with jQuery >>> as >>> this one only allows defer at max as the ordering matters here... >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> KB >>> >>>

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

gorov" <mgrigo...@apache.org> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Januar 2018 12:43:41 Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers Hi, 1) one can always replace the version with JavaScriptLibrarySettings 2.x is used as default because most jQuery plugins are not migrated to 3.x, JS folk

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

mgrigo...@apache.org> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Januar 2018 12:43:41 > > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > > > Hi, > > > > 1) one can always replace the version with JavaScriptLibrarySettings > > 2.x is used as default becau

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

would not be possible with jQuery as this one only allows defer at max as the ordering matters here... Best, KB - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Martin Grigorov" <mgrigo...@apache.org> > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Januar 2018 12:43:41 >

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

iers.net> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Januar 2018 10:57:39 Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers Hi Maxim, I don't think WICKET-6498 will be part of Wicket 8: There are still conceptual open questions (who decides what resources to defer) and implementation issues, i.e. does the p

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

t;>> for wicket as the time has changed. >>> I wonder how wicket will keep up with that if the cycle is so long each >>> time... >>> >>> Best >>> >>> KB >>> >>> PS: I know that you can override the jQuery version as y

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

--- Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Januar 2018 10:57:39 Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers Hi Maxim, I don't think WICKET-6498 will be part of Wicket 8: There are still conceptual open questions (who decides w

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

you can override the jQuery version as you like, it is > just an example how the "best idea/ way to do it" changes over time > > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > Gesendet:

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

ry version as you like, it is just an example how the "best idea/ way to do it" changes over time - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Januar 2018 10:57:39 > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 bloc

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

hreef Korbinian Bachl < > >> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> > >> > >> > May I also mention WICKET-6498? > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

>> > May I also mention WICKET-6498? >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498 >> > >> > >> > >> > - Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >> > > Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> >> > > An: dev@w

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

--- Ursprüngliche Mail - > > > Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> > > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Dezember 2017 16:22:47 > > > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > > > > > Not strictly necessary, but I would like to me

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498 > > > > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Dezember 2017 16:22:47 > > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

May I also mention WICKET-6498? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498 - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Sven Meier" <s...@meiers.net> > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Dezember 2017 16:22:47 > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers >

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

+1 2017-12-29 17:22 GMT+02:00 Sven Meier : > Not strictly necessary, but I would like to merge WICKET-6503: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6503 > > Have fun > Sven > > > Am 29.12.2017 um 06:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > >> Hello All, >> >> Is it time for

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Not strictly necessary, but I would like to merge WICKET-6503: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6503 Have fun Sven Am 29.12.2017 um 06:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: Hello All, Is it time for release? There are long holidays upcoming here, so I can send more time on Wicket :)))

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Hello All, Is it time for release? There are long holidays upcoming here, so I can send more time on Wicket :))) On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Martijn Dashorst < > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > No

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Martijn Dashorst < martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > No technical blockers AFAIK, however, we really should do the marketing > right: > > - front page of website should feature 8 prominently > - work with Sally from PR for a press release to let the world know

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

No technical blockers AFAIK, however, we really should do the marketing right: - front page of website should feature 8 prominently - work with Sally from PR for a press release to let the world know we are not Dead Yet™ - have a really great announcement to give to the world about all the

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

.com> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 10:08:15 > > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > > > I love to help here > > But I don't see clear solution . > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Korbinian Bachl

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

l.com> > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 10:08:15 > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > I love to help here > But I don't see clear solution . > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Korbinian Bachl < > korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de>

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

max...@gmail.com> > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 10:01:46 > Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers > You can add your scripts to the "custom place" > https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/8.x/single.html#_put_javascript_inside_page_body > A

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

You can add your scripts to the "custom place" https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/8.x/single.html#_put_javascript_inside_page_body And provide your "minified and optimized JS file from webdesigner" jquery version as the main one for wicket . On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Korbinian

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

Yes, you are right - it has to be optional at least, something even the current jQuery reference isn't yet (you only can provide an empty one js file - still a request); >From my experience this all is worse than at the time before jQuery was >introduced to wicket as this really slows down the

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

t, KB - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> An: dev@wicket.apache.org Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 03:32:48 Betreff: 8.0.0 blockers Hello All, do we have any blockers for 8.0.0? -- WBR Maxim aka solomax Am 29. Nov. 2017, 09:3

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

good IMHO as its blocking the DOM with JS; > > Best, > > KB > > > > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > Von: "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 03:32:48 > >

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

9. November 2017 03:32:48 > Betreff: 8.0.0 blockers > Hello All, > > do we have any blockers for 8.0.0? > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax

8.0.0 blockers

Hello All, do we have any blockers for 8.0.0? -- WBR Maxim aka solomax