Re: JavaZone presentation, feedback wanted

2007-08-22 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Looks good to me Xavier. A danger about the example is that it would probably be easy to be focussed on determining the password strength rather than how to create a custom component, but then again, the example by itself is nice, and can't just be found in the examples projects. The kind of

Re: JavaZone presentation, feedback wanted

2007-08-22 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 8/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks good to me Xavier. A danger about the example is that it would probably be easy to be focussed on determining the password strength rather than how to create a custom component, That's why I provide only a very simple implementation.

Re: JavaZone presentation, feedback wanted

2007-08-22 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 8/22/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/22/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks good to me Xavier. A danger about the example is that it would probably be easy to be focussed on determining the password strength rather than how to create a custom component,

Re: [vote2] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3

2007-08-22 Thread Eelco Hillenius
[ x ] yes release 1.3.0-beta3 to our community [ ] no, ... Eelco

Re: [vote2] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
[✗] yes release 1.3.0-beta3 to our community [ ] no, ... -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/

Re: [vote2] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3

2007-08-22 Thread Johan Compagner
Release On 8/21/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have uploaded a new version of the Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 release to my people.apache.org account. Updates are: - updated copyright info in the notice.txt file (Frank) - archetype source is now included in the distribution, so it

Re: [vote2] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3

2007-08-22 Thread Al Maw
Martijn Dashorst wrote: I have uploaded a new version of the Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 release to my people.apache.org account. Updates are: - updated copyright info in the notice.txt file (Frank) - archetype source is now included in the distribution, so it builds (Frank) Please look carefully at

Re: [vote2] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3

2007-08-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Al Maw: [x] no, the modification watcher for properties was broken, and that's a sufficiently major issue that we can't possibly release beta3 with that in it. Sorry. :-( The issue seems to have been added by someone in r565035 on August 12, and I've just fixed it in r568603. I'm

Re: [vote2] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3

2007-08-22 Thread Al Maw
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: * Al Maw: [x] no, the modification watcher for properties was broken, and that's a sufficiently major issue that we can't possibly release beta3 with that in it. Sorry. :-( The issue seems to have been added by someone in r565035 on August 12, and I've just

some remarks on LoadableDetachableModel.getObject()

2007-08-22 Thread Peter Dotchev
Hi, I'm new to wicket so I'm still learning from the source. So I came across this method in LoadableDetachableModel public Object getObject() { if (!attached) { attached = true; transientModelObject