Igor posted a comment to this bug saying that overriding isVisible() is evil
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3171
I was surprised by this and am curious to hear more.
D/
, Douglas Ferguson
doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
Igor posted a comment to this bug saying that overriding isVisible() is
evil
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3171
I was surprised by this and am curious to hear more.
D/
+1
On Dec 16, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
this vote is to release wicket 1.4.5
this build fixes some critical problems with 1.4.4, namely WICKET-2613
and some modal-window related issues.
branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.5/
artifacts:
I am trying to create a quick start to recreate my issue and I have been
unsuccessful.
I'm guess it has something to do with my environment.
Anybody have any tips on how to reproduce a huge stack in a quick start?
I created the entire inheritance tree and keep most of the same html, which was
together.
If I were you, I'd start trying to debug directly in my project by setting
breakpoints, etc, rather than continue with the quickstart.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Douglas Ferguson
doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
I am
My issue had to do with expecting enclosure to allow you to not add the fields
when it is hidden, it seems to be working now that I've corrected this,
although it does incorrectly report the missing fields.
D/
On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Marcus Mattila wrote:
[x] don't release 1.4.4
+1 (i withdraw my no)
On Dec 9, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
+1
-igor
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
wrote:
this vote is to release wicket 1.4.4
branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.4/
artifacts:
at 5:30 PM, Douglas Ferguson
doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
Unless I did something wrong:
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/ wicket
1.4.x.SNAPSHOT
cd 1.4.x.SNAPSHOT
mvn -Dmaven.test.skip=true install
I set my wicket version to 1.4-SNAPSHOT
D/
On Dec
as fixed...
-igor
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Douglas Ferguson
doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
No
This is not fixed:
* [WICKET-2519] - 1.4.2 enclosure problem
On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
this vote is to release wicket 1.4.4
branch: https
I agree that this area could benefit from a redesign.
I specifically found it difficult when writing a RequestHandler that would
redirect request from ssl to non-ssl depending no the page type.
I.E. Login is redirected to HTTPS, then regular page redirects you back to HTTP
D/
On 8/20/09
No.. I just finally set our pom to 1.4 and dealing with the 4,000 warnings!
I'm wondering what other folks are doing for thinks like Link(s) or simple
components that don't make use of a model.
In some cases I've just added String to make eclipse stop complaining...
I'll look into @RequireHttps,
Something that I've encounter that I found frustrating that might be worth
considering in the new design:
Construct a page...
Realize you need to forward to another page,
Call setResponsePage(...)
If the constructor short circuits when it realizes that the request is getting
forwarded,
Wicket
Wow.. Cool.. Thanks!
Another one that I had trouble with was ModelListMyPojo
I'm guessing cuz the compiler/ide doesn't see List as Serializable.
D/
On 8/20/09 5:57 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
If your component does not use model you can use Void.
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009
Sorry.. I know.. Didn't mean for it to go there.
On 8/20/09 6:05 PM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
This really isn't the right thread...
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
Wow.. Cool.. Thanks!
Another one that I had trouble
It seems odd to throw an exception to control flow in a non error state, that's
why I was suggesting that you consider a different approach in 1.5
D/
On 8/20/09 6:03 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
thats why we have RestartResponseException(page)
-igor
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009
It isn't my constructor I'm trying to abort.
It is the wicket code that expects me to add certain objects to the page.
If I've already told it that I want to forward to another page, why should it
care that I didn't add X component to the page or the heirarchy doesn't match
D/
On 8/20/09 6:14
This is what I tried to do that would error out.
Page(){
if(condition){
setResponsePage()
}else{
//add components
}
}
On 8/20/09 6:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Douglas
Fergusondoug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
17 matches
Mail list logo
