On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 07:33:47AM -0400, joel maher wrote:
> we have 32 bit windows builds, are there specific concerns you have about
> the perf impact of SSE2 and linux32 builds?
GCC is not MSVC. They don't do the same kinds of optimizations (in fact,
MSVC happily uses both x87 and SSE when
we have 32 bit windows builds, are there specific concerns you have about
the perf impact of SSE2 and linux32 builds?
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 06:40:08PM -0700, jma...@mozilla.com wrote:
> > Our infrastructure at Mozilla
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 06:40:08PM -0700, jma...@mozilla.com wrote:
> Our infrastructure at Mozilla does a great job of supporting all the
> jobs we need to run jobs for the thousands of pushes we do each month.
> Currently Talos runs on real hardware (and we have no plans to change
> that), but
On 2015-09-24 10:55 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
On 9/24/15 6:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
FWIW I agree that Talos results for Linux32 are unimportant. Even if
there
was a Linux-32-only regression, I don't think it'd be worth our
developers
spending time on it.
I agree. Kill them.
+1.
Our infrastructure at Mozilla does a great job of supporting all the jobs we
need to run jobs for the thousands of pushes we do each month. Currently Talos
runs on real hardware (and we have no plans to change that), but it does mean
that we have a limited pool of available machines. Right
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:40 PM, wrote:
> Thanks for reading and fixing Performance regressions when they show up in
> your patches!
>
FWIW I agree that Talos results for Linux32 are unimportant. Even if there
was a Linux-32-only regression, I don't think it'd be worth our
On 9/24/15 6:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
FWIW I agree that Talos results for Linux32 are unimportant. Even if there
was a Linux-32-only regression, I don't think it'd be worth our developers
spending time on it.
I agree. Kill them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DckrYRSsUA
Justin
7 matches
Mail list logo