On 2010/08/26 01:02 PDT, fishjohn wrote:
Hi.
Hope this forum is ok for such question.
Yes.
We have simple lists implemented through /etc/aliases . basically
I want to send encrypted mail to l...@example.com ( which is alias
for person1, person2, ...)
A common desire.
Is there way to
Hi,
I haven't hear any direct quotes but the coolkey folks may be interested as
well.
I agree, but not sure a new project is warranted. A subbranch of the nss
codebase perhaps? No need to fragment the community just because a new
architecture comes into play.
Konstantin Andreev wrote:
On 08/03/10 19:13, Brian Smith wrote:
I think I found a problem with the GCM interface that seems
to make it impossible to use the PKCS#11 interface in a
FIPS-140-compliant
manner. In particular, NIST SP800-38D requires that the IV for the GCM
mode be
generated
In accepting patches to implement TLS 1.2 and/or AES-GCM cipher suites, is a
(potentially-)FIPS-140-compliant implementation required? Or, would it be
acceptable in the short-term to have an implementation that is known to be
non-compliant and thus disabled in FIPS mode?
The main issue
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Brian Smith br...@briansmith.org wrote:
In accepting patches to implement TLS 1.2 and/or AES-GCM cipher suites, is a
(potentially-)FIPS-140-compliant implementation required? Or, would it be
acceptable in the short-term to have an implementation that is known to
Hi all,
In our (mozilla/xulrunner-based) application, we're trying to set up a
secure connection to a server that requires a client certificate.
Rather than the normal case of a client certificate belonging to the
user, and just added to the certificate store, we want to have a
certificate that
I propose that we remove SSL 2.0 support from the NSS
trunk (NSS 3.13).
SSL 2.0 is an old and insecure protocol. No products
should be using SSL 2.0 today. But removing the SSL
2.0 code from NSS has one major benefit to the continual
development of NSS's SSL library: it'll make the code
base
On 08/27/2010 06:36 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
Hi all,
In our (mozilla/xulrunner-based) application, we're trying to set up a
secure connection to a server that requires a client certificate.
Rather than the normal case of a client certificate belonging to the
user, and just added to the
On Aug 27, 4:30 pm, John Dennis jden...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/2010 06:36 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
Hi all,
In our (mozilla/xulrunner-based) application, we're trying to set up a
secure connection to a server that requires a client certificate.
Rather than the normal case of a
9 matches
Mail list logo
