Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.0 based on RC1

2016-12-30 Thread Paul King
+1 (non-binding) I checked the checksums and signature of the source zip. I ran Groovy's master branch against this version including its groovy-ant test suite. I must admit to not having followed much recent discussion on the dev mailing list. Just as an aside for future reference, I thought

Re: 1.9.8 vs 1.10.0 (was Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.0 based on RC1)

2016-12-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2016-12-30, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > The README.html isn't really part of the release and we can simply > modify it at will at any time. Let me try to improve on what we have > right now. I've modified the introduction of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/README.html - is this clearer

Re: 1.9.8 vs 1.10.0 (was Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.0 based on RC1)

2016-12-30 Thread Paul King
Yep, that makes things clearer. Nice. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2016-12-30, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> The README.html isn't really part of the release and we can simply >> modify it at will at any time. Let me try to improve

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.10.0 based on RC1

2016-12-30 Thread Jean-Louis Boudart
+1 here 2016-12-30 14:45 GMT+01:00 Paul King : > +1 (non-binding) > I checked the checksums and signature of the source zip. > I ran Groovy's master branch against this version including its > groovy-ant test suite. > I must admit to not having followed much recent discussion

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.8 based on RC1

2016-12-30 Thread Jean-Louis Boudart
+1 here 2016-12-30 14:35 GMT+01:00 Paul King : > +1 (non-binding) > I checked this version against Groovy's GROOVY_2_4_X and master branches. > Groovy uses some ant features internally and also has a groovy-ant > module with an accompanying test suite. > > Cheers, Paul. > >