On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 19:20 -0800, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
-0
I've said it elsewhere, but the only reason to fuss about a 1.0, is
that it is loaded with special meaning.
Right: that's what we should be doing. Up to and including the start
of 0.6 you almost had to have a committer on
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
...
In other words, at some point you have so many production users that
it's silly to pretend it's ready for 1.0. I'd say we've passed that
point.
Did you mean to say silly to pretend it's *not* ready for 1.0?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Ryan King r...@twitter.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
...
In other words, at some point you have so many production users that
it's silly to pretend it's ready for 1.0. I'd say we've passed that
point.
+1 On making unit tests distributed tests robust
(with without ec2)
Sri
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Ryan King r...@twitter.com wrote:
I'm a -1 on naming the next release 1.0 because I don't think it has
the quality that 1.0 implies, but to be honest I don't really care
that much. The
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
I'd rather drop the leading the 0 and continue to number releases
sequentially the way we have. If our 1 versioning is signaling a lack
of readiness, and if = 1 is a necessary gate, then 8.0 should work
equally as well.
Speaking more for an organization that works with a lot of external parties
using Cassandra (that don't necessarily develop on it), I think the pivot to
1.0 makes better sense. A lot of the world is still coming to know Cassandra
vs. any other NoSQL type solution. In that environment, I think
In that environment, I think the production grade validation is important.
A bump in version number does not give you production grade validation: in
fact, it is the other way around.
I'm -1 on going to 1.0 for the next release.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com
I'm a -1 on naming the next release 1.0 because I don't think it has
the quality that 1.0 implies, but to be honest I don't really care
that much. The version numbers don't really effect those that of use
that are running production clusters. Calling it 1.0 won't make it any
more stable or faster.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:35 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Way back in Nov 09, we did a users survey and asked what features
people wanted to see. Here was my summary of the responses:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Ryan King r...@twitter.com wrote:
I'm a -1 on naming the next release 1.0 because I don't think it has
the quality that 1.0 implies, but to be honest I don't really care
that much. The version numbers don't really effect those that of use
that are running
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 07:55 -0300, Germán Kondolf wrote:
Will CQL be included in the 1.0 release?
CQL 1.0 will be the next release. :)
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
Can I vote with a +100 ? :)
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 07:55 -0300, Germán Kondolf wrote:
Will CQL be included in the 1.0 release?
CQL 1.0 will be the next release. :)
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
--
//GK
Way back in Nov 09, we did a users survey and asked what features
people wanted to see. Here was my summary of the responses:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org/msg01446.html
Looking at that, we've done essentially all of them. I think we can
make a strong case that
+1 days ago I was wondering about the gap between 0.7 and a future 1.0, the
answer is just a few more enhancements like you said. :)
Excellent news :)
// Germán Kondolf
http://twitter.com/germanklf
http://code.google.com/p/seide/
// @i4
On 11/01/2011, at 22:35, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
The list--
Through a copy/paste error I left out the first one:
Increment/decrement: done
:)
--
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support
User documentation: done (http://www.riptano.com/docs)
Apologies if this has been covered elsewhere but, is this a permanent
home? Is there to be mirror on the official site? Surely if the
project itself doesn't have user documentation then the milestone has
not been reached by the project.
I
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 19:35 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Way back in Nov 09, we did a users survey and asked what features
people wanted to see. Here was my summary of the responses:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org/msg01446.html
Looking at that, we've done
17 matches
Mail list logo
