At 12:47 PM 11/13/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you look at what has REALLY happened in the past
3 years ( yes... going back that far since it's now 4 or
5 years since 2.0 became a real blib on the radar ) there's
no question that there was this intense period of
development and 'new' things
For those interested in the question of Apache 2.0 uptake, my favorite resource
is http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/index.html - where you get
gobs of details. The upgrade/downgrade report helps identify if a release was
a winner (mostly upgrading to, or through, that version) - or a
Although it's probably a little late to be responding to innuendo, the bare minimum
points that need a response;
At 12:36 AM 11/14/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a lot going down 'offline' and things were just
being 'announced' on the forum.
That's the way development often happens.
At 12:36 AM 11/14/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'Individual' attempts to contribute are getting IGNORED
and the last few words of this message thread's subject
line are just asking to hear from the powers that be
what they intend to do about that ( solutions please ? ).
Yes, I think that's the
At 01:45 PM 11/14/2003, Sander Striker wrote:
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 09:06, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:55:24AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Just to point out the obvious fact that hopefully everybody can agree with and
consider taking action on:
The Enums look great, can we extend apr_query_mpm instead though?
Bill
At 05:17 PM 11/16/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
If Sander hadn't gone awol this wouldn't be so fubar. Any comments?
ap_server_state_t {
enum {AP_STARTING, AP_STARTED, AP_STOPPING} state;
enum {AP_FIRST_START,
At 07:32 PM 11/16/2003, Martin Kraemer wrote:
...only that tomorrow's apr might not be 100% compatible with today's.
Think of mod_ssl's and mod_dav's problem (the apache_1.3 version). They
must always add the apache_1.3 version number to their own version number
to describe the API they require.
At 02:34 PM 11/18/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Peter J. Cranstone wrote:
If I am not mistaken, I seem to recall that TransmitFile() is artifically limited to
serving no more than 10 TCP connections on non server editions of Windows. I've not
actually tried it myself.
Not TCP connections.
This
We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our
ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes.
However, this turned out to be a nontrival problem. It doesn't appear
that this option was ever a tunable APR option.
We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and
configured
+1 for 1.3 - we made this change already for 2.0 when we encountered
the problem (as we ship mod_ssl in 2.0, but not in 1.3).
I found it interesting that you retained %c - I presume this means that
%c continues to work until mod_ssl replaces it's meaning?
Bill
At 02:16 PM 11/20/2003, you wrote:
At 09:00 PM 11/20/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our
ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes.
sounds good
We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and
configured for, and the attached patch
I hope the response does not diminish your enthusiasm...
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (you can join up with a mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) maintains the mod_specweb and
the perl-framework websites. I believe that flood is seperate at this point.
Please - subscribe and contribute! The
At 01:53 PM 11/26/2003, Christopher Jastram wrote:
Okay, I'm really feeling stupid here.
Where in the world is mod_access? httpd can't run because it chokes on the Order
directive, which comes from mod_access. So where is it?
I'm working on a clean (I hope) checkout of httpd-2.1 (cvs co
At 02:51 PM 11/26/2003, Christopher Jastram wrote:
I checked nagoya, there doesn't seem to be any way to submit bug reports (and
patches) for httpd2.1. Do I submit it under 2.0 or post to the list?
I've reclassed HEAD as 2.0-HEAD (since we can't know) and added a new
category 2.1-HEAD. Hope
At 02:10 PM 12/3/2003, Geoffrey Young wrote:
IfThreaded
MaxThreadsPerChild 5
/IfThreaded
This rubs me the wrong way FWIW.
oops, sorry :)
I don't care for that container either... but even horrible new ideas
are always good when then generate more ideas :)
If somebody really
At 09:36 AM 12/9/2003, Geoffrey Young wrote:
André Malo wrote:
I'd like to keep IfDefine possible. Simply because it's a very efficient
way to comment a whole part out (reliably, since one cannot specify an
empty -D argument). And it's in use out there.
ok, here is a new patch that excludes
At 12:37 PM 12/9/2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Does this look good?
ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_WARNING, 0, r,
mod_include: Options +Includes (or IncludesNoExec)
- wasn't set, passing data unmodified);
+ wasn't set,
At 04:57 PM 12/10/2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Obviously it's not how things work at the moment, as the memory is never
freed (which could probably be dealt with), but the real problem is that
no data will leave the server out before it was completely read
So you propose an inversion here? Won't that break as many modules making
the (currently) correct assumptions, w.r.t. config data?
Logs are created *from* values in the configuration, ergo they should go away
*before* the values that created them are also destroyed.
E.g., if my module creates a
At 07:01 PM 12/10/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
[slightly off-topic]
Actually, I believe that mod_cgi and mod_cgid are currently broken
WRT the CGI spec. The spec says that a CGI may read as much of an
incoming request body as it wishes and may return data as soon as
it wishes
at 01:50:46PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But the 2.0 architecture is entirely different. We need a poll but it's not
entirely
obvious where to put one...
One suggestion raised in a poll bucket: when a connection level filter cannot
read anything more, it passed back a bucket
Just a quick tangent on weak ETags
let's say I have a transform to convert (charset-any) into utf-8 format...
and based on a browser string, conditionally insert that filter.
It's a straightforward (predictable) transform so that it retains any strong
ETag, but it isn't the identity.
At 03:57 PM 12/15/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martin 2003/12/15 06:24:31
Revision ChangesPath
1.67 +70 -0 httpd-2.0/modules/experimental/mod_charset_lite.c
+#if #system(bs2000)
This syntax causes a compile failure on Windows.
Of course - it is
In both Apache 1.3 and 2.0 the UseCanonicalName doesn't work quite as it's
documented. The question would be, do we fix it or document it...
When requesting a document that results in a redirection (directory not
decorated by a trailing backslash, etc) the redirected server name doesn't
actually
At 11:16 AM 12/19/2003, Tony Finch wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:04:15AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
UseCanonicalName Off, Host: header provided (HTTP/1.1)
The host name header *excluding the host header port suffix * of the request
is concatenated to httpd 1.3's Port
At 03:36 AM 12/21/2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
We have users who want to run different post_config hooks for different vhosts. Any
chance httpd-2.0 can be changed to run the open_logs/post_config (or at least
post_config) hooks for each vhost as well? Any reason for not doing that in first
place?
Only question below is should this hook always run before or after the post
config hook? My gut says after post config.
At 11:19 AM 12/22/2003, Geoff wrote:
I had some spare time and thought I could help with the grunt work - my try
at a patch attached.
+for (s = server_conf; s; s =
At 04:47 PM 12/22/2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm not sure this is a good idea to run it on the main host. If it was we could just
as well run post_config for each vhost as well.
No, you missed my earlier point. post_config is a run-once. host_init is the
run-each you requested.
The problem is
At 06:32 AM 1/2/2004, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
update license to 2004.
Why? Unless the file changes in 2004, the copyright doesn't. And, in any case, the
earliest date applies, so it gets us nowhere.
In fairness this has been Roy's practice, so let's not beat on Andre. Roy's logic
Günter,
Just so that everyone is on the same page, 2.1.0 will be an -alpha. If and when
we think we are about done with post 2.0 development, we will finally release
a 2.1.x-beta. That will become the codebase (after an iteration or few) of the
Apache 2.2 release. We are moving twords the
Perhaps this is none of Apache's business, but should be a very specific
result from the various apr_poll setup functions that invoke select()?
Bill
At 08:53 AM 1/6/2004, Brian Akins wrote:
Call me stupid, put why in various places does Apache do things like this:
if (csd = FD_SETSIZE) {
???
Well, I think you are asking a docs question so I'm forwarding there. But this
is nothing more than adding an appropriate LoadModule command, so it is
likely documented there.
Actually causing a loaded module (so, sl, dll or dylib) to actually do anything
productive would be the
Woha...
At 11:50 AM 1/8/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes2004/01/08 09:50:03
Modified:server core.c
Log:
If large file support is enabled allow the file to be split into AP_MAX_SENDFILE
sized buckets. Otherwise Apache will be unable to send files larger than 2 gig due
At 04:51 PM 1/13/2004, Günter Knauf wrote:
do you still expect massive changes with APR 1.0 ?
I have the sense that folks want to see:
* platform neutral apr_poll() that works on apr_file_t's as well, since so many
daemons and other applications will require this. Non trivial - but we may
At 07:05 PM 1/13/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I don't think so because the split into multiple bucket code was
only enabled if both large_file and send_file was enabled. Which meant
that on a non-large_file build the check for ENABLE_SENDFILE_OFF wasn't
there anyway. If they have large_file
Someone remarked to me yesterday that their out-of-box 2.0.48 tarball would
not build under SuSe...
I noticed a brand new change to the libdl detection logic that drops -ldl from the
linkage list on unix. Would you please check that the generated LDFLAGS
did or did not include the -ldl argument
Quick appologies that I hadn't followed up, my 'play' box which handles
my list mail had a nifty hard drive failure that took me offline for the rest
of the month :)
We need a method to determine the library is available and 'enable' the
module when this is so. There are some other side effects
Uhmmm, this isn't an MMN bump :) If you were adding this new
structure *type* as a member of another structure (say as the last
member of the conn_rec) and the structure grew (in such a way that
folks could be blindly oblivious to the fact that conn_rec just got a
bit bigger), that's an MMN bump.
Stas,
we attempt to lock all writes to a file whenever we have a file opened for
append, as unix has this behavior naturally while Win32 does not.
I'd focus on the speed of obtaining that lock. I'd noticed similar before,
myself, and 1/2 suspect that the lock is also flushing the file from
At 11:32 AM 1/26/2004, Aryeh Katz wrote:
http://apache.get-software.com/httpd/binaries/win32/README.html
doesn't have the correct version numbers.
I see this is fix is committed already, thank you for the observation.
As an aside, would it make more sense to use SSI, and get the version number
At 03:39 PM 2/4/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then if I play devil's advocate, someone could see the new directive and turn it
on when it's not appropriate and cause Bad Things to happen. Mainly I'm looking for
comments on whether this should be configurable or not.
Yes, I'm one who will
Quick handlers are not for filtering content. Quick handlers assume
all responsibility for the request, e.g. proxy content servers. In fact this
particular hook was debated for quite a while (with some believing it was
inherently a bad thing.)
I don't believe that redirects have the opportunity
At 05:45 PM 2/4/2004, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
-1. Reject the request with a 400 error instead.
++1 to Roy's suggestion.
I believe that Win32 may accept the back slash (with the changes proposed
for the cygwin port.) However ... here's the trick ... the cygwin httpd port
is emulating Unix, so it
I'm totally confused now :) Do you want Apache to handle the UDP request
as an HTTP request? Or do you want a UDP port that does something else?
First if you want a pool of UDP listeners, explore the MPM - it's the MPM's
job to dispatch requests from TCP, so it would make sense to build upon
At 10:43 AM 2/5/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
At 10:22 AM 2/5/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Will.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:39 PM 2/4/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then if I play devil's advocate, someone could see the new directive and turn
it on when it's
At 09:22 AM 2/5/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Effect/Issue 1:
Bypassing the filesystem canonicalization would be very bad on certain platforms
such as windows, depending on case sensitivity, etc. It would
also bypass *user configured* options such as avoiding symlinks.
only for Location If
At 09:47 AM 2/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:17 PM 2/5/2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
I do, however, agree that doing a directory-walk on virtual resources is
not nice. But my opinion is that virtualness is a property of the
resource, and hence should be designated
At 09:44 AM 2/6/2004, Aryeh Katz wrote:
In the 1.3 environment I was able to use the --shadow configure option to use the
same source tree for multiple os's. This was quite valuable, as one source code
change was needed for all platforms.
However, the --shadow option is gone in 2.0.
If I grok what you are asking
it would be nice if win32, too, would support VPATH builds with a --srcdir
like argument - and throw it's generated files in another directory tree.
Did I get the point? This seems doable.
Bill
At 12:44 PM 2/6/2004, you wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote
At 04:34 PM 2/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
I do, however, agree that doing a directory-walk on virtual resources is
not nice. But my opinion is that virtualness is a property of the
resource, and hence should be designated when selecting the resource.
That is why I
to that fix in 2.0 - I'd like to force the hand on that issue in 2.2. Unsetting
the r-filename would become unnecessary in this trivial example.
Bill
At 08:08 AM 2/9/2004, Brian Akins wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 04:34 PM 2/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/* this info-handler
At 07:43 AM 2/9/2004, you wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If I grok what you are asking
it would be nice if win32, too, would support VPATH builds with a --srcdir
like argument - and throw it's generated files in another directory tree.
Did I get the point? This seems doable
At 01:37 PM 2/9/2004, André Malo wrote:
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You hit the nail on the head - Alias (and mod_rewrite) cause us the greatest
grief in fixing this set of issues. *IF* they all are parsed in the
translate name phase we are fine, since map_to_storage
At 03:08 PM 2/9/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or Joshua's virtual keyword on Location , which I like better the more I
think about it.
ooops... s/Joshua/André/
but Joshua has excellent points about virtualness being a property of the
handler. Yes,
At 02:11 PM 2/9/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 04:34 PM 2/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
And perhaps I'm going way off in left field here, but why should this be
user-configurable at all? Shouldn't the (for example) server-status
handler know
Sander has been a committer for over a year to httpd-test/mod_specweb99
with Greg Ames and Andre Malo. Has also been contributing observations
and occasional patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about both specweb99 and
perl-framework for at least as long, as well as less frequent but useful
Sorry folks, was responding to another post that belongs in pmc.
We attempt to keep all code discussions open and transparent on dev@,
and individuals on pmc@ - sorry especially to Sander for this mis-posted
message.
drink beverage=coffee size=24oz
Bill
At 12:45 PM 2/12/2004, William A. Rowe
At 12:50 AM 2/13/2004, Ben Greear wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Ben Greear wrote:
I have need of a web-server which can bind to a particular
device, both by binding to the local IP address and
also using the setsockopt(... SO_BINDTODEVICE) call.
Would there be any chance that such a patch would
be
At 04:07 PM 2/23/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:22:05PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
I started working on Justin's idea of creating a EOC bucket - to
do a SSL shutdown before the socket close(). But since the
ap_flush_conn is called just before
+1, but which warning does 4163 quiet?
At 09:46 AM 2/26/2004, you wrote:
Here's a patch to enable IPv6 on Windows XP 2003.
In addition we'll need to change the setting of
APR_HAVE_IPV6 in apr.hw - seems like we'll need
some awk magic to do that.
Note that enabling IPv6 drags in the need for
the
At 03:40 PM 2/25/2004, Alexis Huxley wrote:
[Mon Feb 16 23:35:33 2004] [warn] (97)Address family not supported by
protocol: get socket to connect to listener
the ticking is an unexpected hard flush when APR_APPEND causes
win32 to file lock for write.
Bill
At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove flags that it finds
redundant, even ones that it added itself. It's a bit schizophrenic like that.
uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes is the default but you have
to pound it into the
At 12:04 PM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
At 12:00 PM 3/4/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove flags that it finds
redundant, even ones that it added itself. It's a bit schizophrenic like
At 09:23 AM 3/5/2004, Steve Hay wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I'm trying to get 2.0.48 to compile using VC++ 5.0 (sp1) on win2k (sp4) and
am having a few issues. yeah, I know it's old, but I happen to have it
around and it's all I have :) anyway, since I'm not a windows guy, some of
this might be
Brad I'm plus 1, especially if we can cause libwww to instigate this connection
mode for httpd-test and prove that it behaves per the RFC convention.
But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the entire mod_ssl 2.1
back to 2.0. Only binary compat issues would need review. But too
At 11:11 AM 3/5/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
I would really like to get the TLS/SSL upgrade functionality into the
2.0.49 release. If Sander is wanting to start the relase on Monday, I
would like to do whatever is easiest to get this patch in.
-1 - too big a change too late in the cycle. +1 for
At 11:19 AM 3/5/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
--On Friday, March 5, 2004 12:20 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the
entire
At 11:32 AM 3/5/2004, Steve Hay wrote:
How do you build on the command line from the .dsp/.dsw's?
The win_compiling.html document that Geoff referred to explains either
using Makefile.win from the command-line (which presumably requires the
.mak files), or else using the .dsp/.dsw files from
At 12:37 PM 3/5/2004, Allan Edwards wrote:
Looks like MSDEV fooness to me. I changed nothing in the project except
adding the eoc file but I can't coax MSDEV into including /incremental:no
in the dsp even though it *is* there in the Link Project Options box.
this is why I always add sources (in
At 03:12 PM 3/13/2004, Sander Striker wrote:
On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 21:35, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I hereby would like to propose that we move the HTTP Server project
codebase to the Subversion repository at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/.
So when?
Can
Something test-dev has kicked around that we should pick back up...
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:44:45 -0500 (CDT)
From: Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current
At 03:05 PM 3/15/2004, Sander Striker wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs.
At 11:27 AM 3/16/2004, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, March 15, 2004 10:52 AM + Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is? How? Unless the committer signs (which ISTR was rejected as an option
when I suggested it, so I'm assuming that doesn't happen), then they must
All of the following seems stale... no?
Compile-Time Configuration Issues
Atomic Operations
The --enable-nonportable-atomics option is relevant for the following platforms:
Solaris on SPARC
By default, APR uses mutex-based atomics on Solaris/SPARC. If you configure with
Win32 dos line-ended/vc5 makefiles/apr-iconv flavor of the *sources*
is now at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.49-win32-src.zip
Win32 builders please test. Binaries to follow.
Bill
At 06:39 AM 3/18/2004, Sander Striker wrote:
I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at:
At 06:16 PM 3/18/2004, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:01:23 +0100, Sascha Kersken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It builds and runs fine on Win2K using Visual Studio .NET 2002.
lurking mode=off
I've built 2.0.49:
- on Windows XP Professional (Spanish Edition)
- with Visual
At 01:42 PM 3/18/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Win32 dos line-ended/vc5 makefiles/apr-iconv flavor of the *sources*
is now at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.49-win32-src.zip
Win32 builders please test. Binaries to follow.
are now up on http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries
Representing a huge palette of code pages - I'd recommend our docs
folk consider this and comment or commit.
Bill
At 10:59 AM 3/19/2004, Zvi Har'El wrote:
Dear Apache developers,
I sent the following three months ago, but since I got no response, and now
2.0.49 has been rolled without the
At 12:06 PM 3/19/2004, André Malo wrote:
* Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 2.1 and +1 form leaving 2.0 and 1.3 alone as they are (backwards
compat etc).
If they are out of spec, fix 2.0 / 1.3 also.
The risk to .conf files are changes in httpd that *force* the user to update
their
How is this apr? seems you have a pool scope bug causing a double-clear?
Bill
At 12:08 PM 3/19/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to test a SSL Proxy server using sslswamp, and I'm running into
the following segmentation fault !
There appears to be some missing error
At 01:30 PM 3/19/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
allocator = 0x0, that's bad. You didn't do a full httpd rebuild, so
there is no way of telling what pool this is. Can you do a full
rebuild (with pool debugging
At 07:47 PM 3/19/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 01:30 PM 3/19/2004, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
allocator = 0x0, that's bad
At 08:42 AM 3/22/2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Shouldn't it instead be Win32DisableAcceptex on|off
To be more consistent with EnableSendFile on|off, et. al? Hadn't considered that but
it makes sense.
or easier to parse and consistant w/ mmap/sendfile;
EnableWin32AcceptEx on|off [default: on if
stoddard2004/03/22 10:51:29
--- mod_rewrite.dsp 23 May 2003 02:47:50 - 1.21
+++ mod_rewrite.dsp 22 Mar 2004 18:51:29 - 1.22
-# ADD LINK32 kernel32.lib /nologo /subsystem:windows /dll /incremental:no /debug
/machine:I386 /out:Release/mod_rewrite.so
At 03:42 PM 3/22/2004, Bojan Smojver wrote:
You are correct, it is probably an expensive operation. The other way
would be to know the position within a file and compare it to the one
that we should go to. If they are the same, do nothing.
I smell future bugs brewing - remember the handle may be
At 10:15 AM 3/27/2004, Esteban Pizzini wrote:
Hi,
I have add this to post_config handler:
apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, NULL, module_clean_up,
apr_pool_cleanup_null);
because I want to know when Apache is shutting down to do some things in my
module...
It works ok when apache shutdown, but
At 05:10 AM 3/29/2004, Tikka, Sami wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please double check then check again. This sounds a lot like a
dynamic ip address issue.
The machine is using static IP address but the DHCP service was also running.
I disabled
At 06:49 AM 3/29/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
solution 4: add some suitable API to APR 0.9 and implement on all platforms
Surely not returning the value from the inc is broken anyway? And a harmless change
even if you don't consider it broken?
a) agreed
Let
At 04:10 PM 4/5/2004, dumass wrote:
hello. the reason i posted it under that abnoxious title was to be able to see any
replies easily. i want to install apache in my Windows 1998 machine. i just waant it
for production runs of scripts so that i don't have to ftp them to my site just to
see
Sumeet Singh wrote:
I was wondering if invoking an internal-redirect from within an output filter is
legal. I need to do that from my output filter but want to make sure that it
conforms to apache2.0 API before I go ahead and design/code it.
I presume this is not safe, but is tolerated by
At 12:50 PM 4/12/2004, Philip Gladstone wrote:
Bill,
That patch works when the server is running on XP SP 1. It doesn't help when the
server is NT4 SP6. I suspect that the TF_WRITE_BEHIND flag is not supported on that
platform.
When the server is XP, the data rate jumps up to 11MBytes/sec on a
At 12:33 PM 4/12/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Any comments on the 1.3.30 release candidate tarball?
The mod_rewrite.dsw was patched to find the ws2_32.lib required
when we modified rewrite. Unfortunately, the .mak file was not
updated at the same time. IDE builds (what I tested a week ago)
work
++1 - if we can correct that directive's name on the way in.
Bill
At 04:09 PM 4/14/2004, you wrote:
I'd like to propose that I simply commit the revised
patch to CVS for us to poke around with/test/review, etc...
My guess is that we'll ship with something similar
and this will provide, at
, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:17:26 -0400
From: felix k sheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 1.3.29 remote root exploit?
Hello,
I run several sites using 1.3.29 and came across this page on the net:
http://secu.zzu.edu.cn/modules.php?name=Newsfile
A general warning for all [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribers;
I run several sites using 1.3.29 and came across this page on the net:
http://secu.zzu.edu.cn/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=413
I want to make clear (after misdirecting the last mail intended to close
a
Jim, would you post a chart of the now-three proposed behaviors,
with the various effects broken out? It would help us all understand
why we need a third way.
Bill
At 02:53 PM 5/11/2004, you wrote:
IMO, we need more control over the port number that Apache
determines to be canonical beyond that
At 08:21 PM 4/29/2004, C.J. Collier wrote:
This project made me think that perhaps Apache should be able to read/write config
files that aren't so difficult to parse.
:) Many of us agree...
Of course, the first example of an easy-to-parse config file format was XML. But I
realize that this
At 10:16 AM 4/17/2004, Jeff White wrote:
quote
The Microsoft Visual C++ Toolkit 2003 includes
the core tools developers need to compile and link
C++-based applications for Windows and the .NET
Common Language Runtime:
Microsoft C/C++ Optimizing Compiler and Linker.
C Runtime Library and
It's a bug in mod_xslt, if that module trys to set aside a transient bucket.
Bill
At 12:09 AM 5/19/2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
We have the following situation in mod_perl 2 land: we use the same buffer to
allocate data in buckets which are passed to the filters. That bucket is created once
per
At 08:33 AM 5/19/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's a bug in mod_xslt, if that module trys to set aside a transient bucket.
Huh? No it isn't. Half of the reason setaside() even exists is to handle
transient buckets.
I didn't say setaside
1 - 100 of 6128 matches
Mail list logo
