On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2008 21:54
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha
Hmmm, normally ap_remove_output_filter should
On 12/09/2008 01:16 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The problem with velocity's site is an interaction between mod_deflate,
mod_include, subrequests and directory indexes. In production, we are
still running 2.3.0-alpha, but I have disabled mod_deflate, which
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133
kinda
needs some more thought.
My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda
needs some more thought.
My
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda
needs some
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output
On 12/09/2008 07:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke
On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 07:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2008 21:54
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha
On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 07:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
[... to the thread as a whole, not specifically to Jim's mail ...]
Let's just say, I usually run alpha-level code in a sandbox for a while
to find problems, We could use it e.g. on people.a.o or maybe httpd.a.o
if you are so keen on it. :-)
Sorry this seems to
Paul Querna wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008.
Thanks,
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha versions.
Best. Place. Ever. to try out our stuff to find and fix bugs.
Especially nasty edge cases
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
If that is the reason that e.g. the Velocity site broke, I am +1 for
rolling this back to a known stable 2.2.x version.
Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha versions.
If we don't trust our own software to run in production, who else
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 08:18
An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 14:38
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha
On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
If that is the reason that e.g. the Velocity site broke, I am +1 for
rolling this back to a known stable 2.2.x version.
Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha versions.
If we don't trust our own software to run in
On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:40 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
If that is the reason that e.g. the Velocity site broke, I am +1 for
rolling this back to a known stable 2.2.x version.
Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 08:18
An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008.
-1 for these two reasons:
1) Default build doesn't work
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008.
Thanks,
Paul
-? tested on Windows XP built both VS9 and VS6
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008.
Thanks,
Paul
-? tested on Windows XP
Paul Querna wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
[Mon Dec 08 13:21:17 2008] [crit] Server MUST relinquish startup
privileges before accepting connections. Please ensure mod_unixd or
other system security module is loaded.
Configuration Failed
I'm guessing no one updated the winnt mpm for the
While we are at it;
If mod_mem_cache is no longer going to be used, needs to be removed
from makefile.win
Gregg
Paul Querna wrote:
Gregg
L. Smith wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha
are available at:
Paul Querna wrote:
The problem with velocity's site is an interaction between mod_deflate,
mod_include, subrequests and directory indexes. In production, we are
still running 2.3.0-alpha, but I have disabled mod_deflate, which seems
to work as a work around for now.
We are now running with
Paul Querna wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The problem with velocity's site is an interaction between mod_deflate,
mod_include, subrequests and directory indexes. In production, we are
still running 2.3.0-alpha, but I have disabled mod_deflate, which seems
to work as a work around for now.
We are
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda
needs some more thought.
My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which I last refactored, but
was bogusly introduced for
2008/12/9 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda
needs some more thought.
My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which I last
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda
needs some more thought.
My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which I last refactored, but
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Am I missing something?
[Mon Dec 08 13:21:17 2008] [crit] Server MUST relinquish startup
privileges before accepting connections. Please ensure mod_unixd or
other system security module is loaded.
Configuration Failed
Probably not. Looks like this'll be broken on
Nick,
It works! ... but needs to have mpm_common.h included
I notice it takes about 4 seconds to serve the It works page on this
P4 3.0G HT, 2.5G DDR2 XP VC6
Gregg
--- modules/arch/win32/mod_win32.c(revision 724570)
+++ modules/arch/win32/mod_win32.c(working copy)
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
{eos,aruroa}.apache.org, aka www.apache.org have both been upgraded to
2.3.0.
If anyone sees anything odd, please let me know.
Thanks,
Paul
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ]
On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha
versions.
Best. Place. Ever. to try out our stuff to find and fix bugs.
Especially nasty edge cases like this one.
www.apache.org should run dogfood whenever possible.
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
If that is the reason that e.g. the Velocity site broke, I am +1 for
rolling this back to a known stable 2.2.x version.
Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha versions.
We have always run -alpha versions, even with experimental MPMs on our
Paul Querna wrote:
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008.
72 hours for a first alpha? Really sounds rushed to me, I may or
may not have a chance to look at it in time.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008.
72 hours for a first alpha? Really sounds rushed to me, I may or
may not have a chance to look at it in time.
It was 72 hours
35 matches
Mail list logo
