On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:28:15AM +0100, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> So for 2.4.x on my accepted back port I have don't need changes-entries and
> I have to process CHANGES by hands as I missed creating a changes-entries
> file in trunk.
If you file a Github PR for the backport you can still
On 2/14/24 11:06, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 2/14/24 10:53 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Are there any rules to use changes-entries or write directly in CHANGES?
IMHO change-entries is preferred. See
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/README.CHANGES?view=markup
I just
On 2/14/24 10:53 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any rules to use changes-entries or write directly in CHANGES?
>
IMHO change-entries is preferred. See
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/README.CHANGES?view=markup
I just noticed that we probably need a
> Am 14.02.2024 um 10:53 schrieb jean-frederic clere :
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there any rules to use changes-entries or write directly in CHANGES?
Files in changes-entries make it easier to backport, as they will be no
conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Frederic
