Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/146
@mgreau
The time has not yet come for 3.0 and junit5.
We are in progress. Both branches are not mergable. I should cherry pick
changes and fix a failing IT in 3.0-rc1. First of all
Sweet.. this looks good to me.
+1 (non binding, committer)
manfred
Tibor Digana wrote on 2017-04-11 04:19:
> We need to have one more voice.
>
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 70 issues:
>>
Github user mgreau commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/146
Hi,
Ok, thanks for the information.
This PR just fixes an oversight when #142 was merged on the 3.0-rc1 branch,
nothing more.
> Then we will integrate support for Jigsaw Java
Github user mgreau commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/142
@britter Hi FYI I have create a PR (#146) to finalize the updates proposed
by @marcphilipp
At @exoplatform we are working on UI automation tests with Maven JUnit5 and
Selenide, so
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/146
Not on the same version. It's not legal to introduce incomplete feature.
The acceptable way would be to introduce junit5 in 3.0-alpha-1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Hi Tibor,
you have more than enough PMC[1] votes.
Robert
[1] http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#maven-pmc
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:19:40 +0200, Tibor Digana
wrote:
We need to have one more voice.
On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Tibor Digana
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Petar Tahchiev, Robert Scholte, Tibor Digana, Hervé BOUTEMY, Olivier
Lamy
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
On Sat, 08 Apr 2017 15:26:38 +0200, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Github user pono closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/7
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pono closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/108
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user pono closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/110
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pono closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/108
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Archetype Plugin, version 3.0.1
In short, Archetype is a Maven project templating toolkit. An archetype is
defined as an original pattern or model from which all other things of the
same kind are made. The names
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/103
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/33
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
I suppose this is tied to lots of intermittent failures on git clone updates
that Jenkins has [1]
error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/origin/MNG-6169/all-updated': 'refs/
remotes/origin/MNG-6169' exists; cannot create 'refs/remotes/origin/MNG-6169/
all-updated'
! [new branch]
Robert,
Should this war plugin be added to the Java 9 - Jigsaw Wiki page in the
plugins section?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 11 avril 2017, 10:14:12 CEST Enrico Olivelli a écrit :
> Thank you all for your quick answers
>
> @Robert
Hi Hervé,
On 12/04/17 04:35, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I suppose this is tied to lots of intermittent failures on git clone updates
that Jenkins has [1]
error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/origin/MNG-6169/all-updated': 'refs/
remotes/origin/MNG-6169' exists; cannot create
Thank you all for your quick answers
@Robert
I have checked out the code and took a deeper look:
the implementation of MWAR-397 is complex and will take some time, on the
mid term I agree that it will an awesome solution
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-397
@Jörg
The option
Thx Herve. Surefire was the last in the puzzle to have a colored output
with newly released Maven 3.5.0.
We would be happy to release surefire with JUnit 5, Java 9 support and
version 3.0 in the future.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> tested on
GitHub user eolivelli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/112
Maven War Plugin eash fix
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eolivelli/maven-plugins
maven-war-plugin-easy-fix
@Jörg
I have updated the PR with your proposal of registering only a bunch of
converters.
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/112
It is working very well (with a very simple webapp) !
I think it is the most simple solution for the Java9 problem actually. It
does not require invasive
We need to have one more voice.
On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 70 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317927=12334636
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
Hi Enrico,
Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Thank you all for your quick answers
>
> @Robert
> I have checked out the code and took a deeper look:
> the implementation of MWAR-397 is complex and will take some time, on the
> mid term I agree that it will an awesome solution
>
GitHub user mgreau opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/146
SUREFIRE-1330: Fix module name in surefire-providers reactor
This PR fixes the JUnit5 module name `surefire-junit-platform` in the
`surefire-providers` POM reactor.
Build logs
24 matches
Mail list logo