[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #146: SUREFIRE-1330: Fix module name in surefire-provid...

2017-04-11 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/146 @mgreau The time has not yet come for 3.0 and junit5. We are in progress. Both branches are not mergable. I should cherry pick changes and fix a failing IT in 3.0-rc1. First of all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 3

2017-04-11 Thread Manfred Moser
Sweet.. this looks good to me. +1 (non binding, committer) manfred Tibor Digana wrote on 2017-04-11 04:19: > We need to have one more voice. > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Tibor Digana > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We solved 70 issues: >>

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #146: SUREFIRE-1330: Fix module name in surefire-provid...

2017-04-11 Thread mgreau
Github user mgreau commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/146 Hi, Ok, thanks for the information. This PR just fixes an oversight when #142 was merged on the 3.0-rc1 branch, nothing more. > Then we will integrate support for Jigsaw Java

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #142: SUREFIRE-1330: Import provider code donated by JU...

2017-04-11 Thread mgreau
Github user mgreau commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/142 @britter Hi FYI I have create a PR (#146) to finalize the updates proposed by @marcphilipp At @exoplatform we are working on UI automation tests with Maven JUnit5 and Selenide, so

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #146: SUREFIRE-1330: Fix module name in surefire-provid...

2017-04-11 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/146 Not on the same version. It's not legal to introduce incomplete feature. The acceptable way would be to introduce junit5 in 3.0-alpha-1. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 3

2017-04-11 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Tibor, you have more than enough PMC[1] votes. Robert [1] http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#maven-pmc On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:19:40 +0200, Tibor Digana wrote: We need to have one more voice. On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Tibor Digana

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Archetype Plugin version 3.0.1

2017-04-11 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Petar Tahchiev, Robert Scholte, Tibor Digana, Hervé BOUTEMY, Olivier Lamy PMC quorum: reached I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On Sat, 08 Apr 2017 15:26:38 +0200, Robert Scholte wrote:

[GitHub] maven-site pull request #7: Corrected assumption regarding execution's confi...

2017-04-11 Thread pono
Github user pono closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/7 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #108: Updated dependencies

2017-04-11 Thread pono
Github user pono closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/108 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] maven pull request #110: plexus

2017-04-11 Thread pono
Github user pono closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/110 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] maven pull request #108: Added some javadoc

2017-04-11 Thread pono
Github user pono closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/108 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[ANN] Apache Maven Archetype Plugin 3.0.1 Released

2017-04-11 Thread Robert Scholte
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Archetype Plugin, version 3.0.1 In short, Archetype is a Maven project templating toolkit. An archetype is defined as an original pattern or model from which all other things of the same kind are made. The names

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #103: Fix link to assembly-component.html

2017-04-11 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/103 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] maven-wagon pull request #33: WAGON-363 wagon-ftp omit duplicate CWD

2017-04-11 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/33 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: Github mirror broken

2017-04-11 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I suppose this is tied to lots of intermittent failures on git clone updates that Jenkins has [1] error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/origin/MNG-6169/all-updated': 'refs/ remotes/origin/MNG-6169' exists; cannot create 'refs/remotes/origin/MNG-6169/ all-updated' ! [new branch]

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

2017-04-11 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Robert, Should this war plugin be added to the Java 9 - Jigsaw Wiki page in the plugins section? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw Regards, Hervé Le mardi 11 avril 2017, 10:14:12 CEST Enrico Olivelli a écrit : > Thank you all for your quick answers > > @Robert

Re: Github mirror broken

2017-04-11 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Hervé, On 12/04/17 04:35, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: I suppose this is tied to lots of intermittent failures on git clone updates that Jenkins has [1] error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/origin/MNG-6169/all-updated': 'refs/ remotes/origin/MNG-6169' exists; cannot create

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

2017-04-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Thank you all for your quick answers @Robert I have checked out the code and took a deeper look: the implementation of MWAR-397 is complex and will take some time, on the mid term I agree that it will an awesome solution https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-397 @Jörg The option

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 3

2017-04-11 Thread Tibor Digana
Thx Herve. Surefire was the last in the puzzle to have a colored output with newly released Maven 3.5.0. We would be happy to release surefire with JUnit 5, Java 9 support and version 3.0 in the future. On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > tested on

[GitHub] maven-plugins pull request #112: Maven War Plugin eash fix

2017-04-11 Thread eolivelli
GitHub user eolivelli opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/112 Maven War Plugin eash fix You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/eolivelli/maven-plugins maven-war-plugin-easy-fix

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

2017-04-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
@Jörg I have updated the PR with your proposal of registering only a bunch of converters. https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/112 It is working very well (with a very simple webapp) ! I think it is the most simple solution for the Java9 problem actually. It does not require invasive

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20 - TAKE 3

2017-04-11 Thread Tibor Digana
We need to have one more voice. On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 70 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12317927=12334636 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: >

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

2017-04-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Enrico, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Thank you all for your quick answers > > @Robert > I have checked out the code and took a deeper look: > the implementation of MWAR-397 is complex and will take some time, on the > mid term I agree that it will an awesome solution >

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request #146: SUREFIRE-1330: Fix module name in surefire...

2017-04-11 Thread mgreau
GitHub user mgreau opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/146 SUREFIRE-1330: Fix module name in surefire-providers reactor This PR fixes the JUnit5 module name `surefire-junit-platform` in the `surefire-providers` POM reactor. Build logs