Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

Il dom 13 ago 2017, 17:31 Tibor Digana ha scritto: > I found an issue. JDK printed this on std/out: > WARNING: Using incubator modules: jdk.incubator.httpclient > IMHO This is because we are importing all system modules. Maybe importing only java.se.ee would cover

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

You will need the same tricks at runtime for the command line that Maven might hide at build time... :-( I guess hacks like --add-modules ALL-SYSTEM will become part of our daily grind... Gary On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il mar 15 ago 2017,

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

I'm guessing that all the pain of doing this will not be fully known until Maven is Java 9-ified. Gary On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il mar 15 ago 2017, 17:51 Gary Gregory ha > scritto: > > > You will need the same

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:57:37 +0200, Gary Gregory wrote: I'm guessing that all the pain of doing this will not be fully known until Maven is Java 9-ified. Not sure what you mean by this. Maven itself can run on Java 9, most plugins work with Java 9, most Java 9

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

Il mar 15 ago 2017, 00:03 Tibor Digana ha scritto: > I do not want to be too pessimistic but the inheritance of modules is > crucial for all the world. > > The common sense tells me that I should not release Java 9 on September, > 2017 unless Java EE application

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

Il mar 15 ago 2017, 17:51 Gary Gregory ha scritto: > You will need the same tricks at runtime for the command line that Maven > might hide at build time... :-( I guess hacks like --add-modules ALL-SYSTEM > will become part of our daily grind... > Gary, I think you are

How to use Invoker in Jenkinsfile

Can you give me pls an example with "invoker" in Jenkinsfile showing test reports in "Test result" screen from maven-invoker-plugin. This should be something similar to "junit" success { junit healthScaleFactor: 0.0, allowEmptyResults: true, keepLongStdio: true, testResults:

Re: JDK9: Maven-JLink-Plugin, Maven-JMod-Plugin

Hi Karl Heinz, I think it makes sense to have these packaging plugins. Haven't looked at the code yet, but you can start with the preparations. I hope Brian is available to make this Jira projects. thanks, Robert On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 21:19:55 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise

[GitHub] maven-integration-testing issue #21: [MNG-6127] Add plugin execution configu...

Github user mkrizmanic commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/21 already merged --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled

Re: maven-compiler-plugin release

I need to work an the plexus-java performance issue and also think of a way to preserve the extra JPMS arguments used during compilation so they can be available at runtime as well (= MCOMPILER-296). As far as I know these are the final open issues required to have a complete Java 9

[GitHub] maven-integration-testing pull request #21: [MNG-6127] Add plugin execution ...

Github user mkrizmanic closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/21 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or

Re: JDK9: Maven-JLink-Plugin, Maven-JMod-Plugin

Hi Robert, I've taken a the liberaty to create INFRA[1] ticket which seemed be already working on... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14878 On 15/08/17 22:10, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi Karl Heinz, I think it makes sense to have these

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

Hi Gary, as Robert already pointed out Maven can run fine on JDK 9...for a very long time.. I'm working on support for jlink, jmod to support creation of run time images with Maven simple (currently in its alpha states if this is appropriate) ...which can be looked at the currenty example

ASF Jenkins fails on Pipeline build saying that javac has no permissions

Hi dev, In ASF/Maven we have this build [1] which uses Jenkinsfile and Pipeline. Compiling the project fails with error [2]. Do you know what we are doing wrong and how to fix it? [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-surefire-pipeline/job/master/57/console [2]: [ERROR]

maven-compiler-plugin release

Hi Robert, would you think we should do another release for maven-compiler-plugin ? Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: ASF Jenkins fails on Pipeline build saying that javac has no permissions

No I updated Jenkinsfile [1] and the result is better but still strange with this error: /bin/sh: 1: /bin/java: not found [1]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/commit/5f70c371c6be09d5599b713490d9d1a77b3f809f On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Tibor Digana

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

Hi Enrico, It does not appear on console output however it is stored as native std/out in target/surefire-reports/2017-08-13T23-52-13_184.dumpstream On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Enrico Olivelli [via Maven] < ml+s40175n5912520...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Il dom 13 ago 2017, 17:31 Tibor Digana

Re: [JAVA 9] Need for review of branch SUREFIRE-1403

Ok guys, I am glad too that you are satisfied, so I will push the branch to master, and thank you very much for working with me. Enrico, I know that you are on vacation right now but I would like to kindly ask you to join us on IRC channel, maybe after your vacation. Thx. On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at

Re: [JAVA 9] Need for review of branch SUREFIRE-1403

Il mar 15 ago 2017, 14:25 Tibor Digana ha scritto: > Ok guys, I am glad too that you are satisfied, so I will push the branch to > master, and thank you very much for working with me. > Enrico, I know that you are on vacation right now but I would like to > kindly

Re: [JAVA 9] Need for review of branch SUREFIRE-1403

+1 for me I have checked out branch SUREFIRE-1403 and I was able to run tests of an application which uses java.sql.Timestamp without changes in code, just but upgrading surefire to 21.1-SNAPSHOT Unfortunately I do not use the failsafe plugin so I have to real world project to test I did a brief