Re: Contact to SourceForge

Dave Brondsema is our contact. May I ask you what is the problem you're trying to solve? Roberto 2017-02-15 22:52 GMT+01:00 Raphael Bircher : > Hi all > > I search our contact to SourceForge. Has anyone the information? > > Regards Raphael > > -- > Mein Blog:

Re: Documentation needs

Hi all Am .02.2017, 15:20 Uhr, schrieb Patricia Shanahan : On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to

Re: Documentation needs

On 02/15/2017 06:07 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >From this perspective I'd start with an FAQ. This is where it would be great if Solr, in conjunction with some of the other technologies that are being developed by The Apache Software Foundation could crawl through the various mailing lists, forums,

Re: Documentation needs

> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > [knmc] > I do not read German, but from the looks of the ProOO-Box > page above, it > appears that the documentation is based on the work of the OOoAuthors > Group and as such would most likely be under the CC-BY license. > [/knmc]

Re: Documentation needs

On 2/15/2017 12:43 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > >> [knmc] >> I do not read German, but from the looks of the ProOO-Box >> page above, it >> appears that the documentation is based on the work of the OOoAuthors >> Group and as such would

Re: Documentation needs

I learned on Fosdem from the pro documenters to stick to # use case oriented approach. ALWAYS. # never start with index # set the possibility to provide feedback as low as possible. # and only describe how it is done # don't use insiders. >From this perspective I'd start with an FAQ. And then

Re: AOO 4.1.4 Release Schedule

Hi Marcus, From an earlier discussion: > Ariel Constenla-Haile > > Sun, 27 Nov 2016 04:41:09 -0800 > > > > On

Re: Documentation needs

On 2/15/2017 9:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> Hello, >> >>> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] >> >>> I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with >>> writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The >>>

Re: Documentation needs

Hi Patricia, A good starting point would be our SDK (HTML documentation). http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/odk/ I only wanted to update the Apache logo for the HTML docs but then I found some typos, outdated links (e.g. to SUN Java) and still some OpenOffice.org branding. I

Contact to SourceForge

Hi all I search our contact to SourceForge. Has anyone the information? Regards Raphael -- Mein Blog: https://raphaelbircher.blogspot.ch - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: AOO 4.1.4 Release Schedule

Am 15.02.2017 um 17:52 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Marcus, From an earlier discussion: Ariel Constenla-Haile Sun, 27 Nov 2016 04:41:09 -0800

gnu make port and the build.pl script

Hello, will we get rid of the build.pl script once the gnu make port is over? just asking, because I then I dont start debugging the script. I have realy strange issues. I run into an compile error with build --all. Then I switch into the module start again build --all and the module

Re: Documentation needs

On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] I'm sure our documentation needs work, and there is someone with writing, editing, and copyediting skills hoping to help. The doc@ list seems to be dead, except for one message posted this year.