Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-25 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 24/05/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote: As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options, but they work (for me). Release options are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/ The ones from 4.1.2 are correct, the ones from 4.1.3 are not (so

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-25 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote: I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the release manager :) OK, perfect! As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the latest. I don't think next week is realistic, since the process takes longer. Still, if the idea is

FRAUDULENT SALES OF OPENOFFICE

2017-05-25 Thread Loc Entertaintment
Hi my name is James, I was shopping online for new software as I don't at the moment have the $100's of dollars to purchase a new copy of microsoft office suite and I came accross a couple of sellers on ebay selling your product or product keys. I wanted to research OpenIffice as I have never

Re: FRAUDULENT SALES OF OPENOFFICE

2017-05-25 Thread Peter Kovacs
From the Source Code Point of view. You are right. Our License does not prohibit selling. The issue I see is in the unsanctioned use of OpenOffice. The Product name has been for example altered. However this is up to the Apache Members on the List to check if these are sanctioned by Apache

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-25 Thread Matthias Seidel
That was the link I was looking for! ;-) Will try the ones from 4.1.2 in my next build. Regards, Matthias Am 25.05.2017 um 08:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 24/05/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote: >> As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options, >> but they work (for me).

Re: FRAUDULENT SALES OF OPENOFFICE

2017-05-25 Thread Pavel Belski
Hi, I'm by no means an expert on opensource licenses, so i just want to clarify something As I understand it, there is nothing wrong for someone to sell or repackage open sourced software, most open source licenses explicitly allow that. Provided of course that certain conditions are met(like

Re: Status: 4.1.4

2017-05-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On May 25, 2017, at 3:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the >> release manager :) > > OK, perfect! > >> As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the >> latest.