I agree that this area could benefit from a redesign.
I specifically found it difficult when writing a RequestHandler that would
redirect request from ssl to non-ssl depending no the page type.
I.E. Login is redirected to HTTPS, then regular page redirects you back to HTTP
D/
On 8/20/09 3:46
o @RequireHttps, but now that I have it working, I'm not sure I'll
touch it.
Are there good docs on it anywhere?
D/
On 8/20/09 4:53 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" wrote:
have you seen @RequireHttps in 1.4? it is a pita, but its doable.
-igor
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Douglas
n Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Douglas
Ferguson wrote:
> I agree that this area could benefit from a redesign.
>
> I specifically found it difficult when writing a RequestHandler that would
> redirect request from ssl to non-ssl depending no the page type.
>
> I.E. Login is redirected t
Wow.. Cool.. Thanks!
Another one that I had trouble with was Model>
I'm guessing cuz the compiler/ide doesn't see List as Serializable.
D/
On 8/20/09 5:57 PM, "Matej Knopp" wrote:
If your component does not use model you can use .
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:
Sorry.. I know.. Didn't mean for it to go there.
On 8/20/09 6:05 PM, "Matej Knopp" wrote:
This really isn't the right thread...
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Douglas
Ferguson wrote:
> Wow.. Cool.. Thanks!
>
> Another one that I had trouble with was
r Vaynberg" wrote:
>
> have you seen @RequireHttps in 1.4? it is a pita, but its doable.
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Douglas
> Ferguson wrote:
>> I agree that this area could benefit from a redesign.
>>
>> I specifically found it difficu
x27;t match"
D/
On 8/20/09 6:14 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" wrote:
doesnt seem that weird if you want to abort the creation of an object
- that is what you want here dont you? if you know of another
construct in java that will let us do that i am all ears.
-igor
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 a
This is what I tried to do that would error out.
Page(){
if(condition){
setResponsePage()
}else{
//add components
}
}
On 8/20/09 6:26 PM, "Igor Vaynberg" wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Douglas
Ferguson wrote:
> It isn't my constructor I
No
This is not fixed:
* [WICKET-2519] - 1.4.2 enclosure problem
On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> this vote is to release wicket 1.4.4
>
> branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.4/
> artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.4/
as fixed...
>
> -igor
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Douglas Ferguson
> wrote:
>> No
>>
>> This is not fixed:
>>
>> * [WICKET-2519] - 1.4.2 enclosure problem
>>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
&
-igor
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Douglas Ferguson
> wrote:
>> Unless I did something wrong:
>>
>> svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/ wicket
>> 1.4.x.SNAPSHOT
>> cd 1.4.x.SNAPSHOT
>> mvn -Dmaven.test.sk
I am trying to create a quick start to recreate my issue and I have been
unsuccessful.
I'm guess it has something to do with my environment.
Anybody have any tips on how to reproduce a huge stack in a quick start?
I created the entire inheritance tree and keep most of the same html, which was
s they work together.
> If I were you, I'd start trying to debug directly in my project by setting
> breakpoints, etc, rather than continue with the quickstart.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Dougla
I've got quickstarts, for both my issues and they both seem related to to
enclosures!
Where to I post them?
On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> so this one problem, that no one seems to be able to reproduce in a
> quickstart and only plagues one or two users, is more important t
done
On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> so this one problem, that no one seems to be able to reproduce in a
> quickstart and only plagues one or two users, is more important then
> the 40+ fixes included in this release all put together?
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:49
My issue had to do with expecting enclosure to allow you to not add the fields
when it is hidden, it seems to be working now that I've corrected this,
although it does incorrectly report the missing fields.
D/
On Dec 9, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Marcus Mattila wrote:
> [x] don't release 1.4.4
>
> reas
+1 (i withdraw my no)
On Dec 9, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> +1
>
> -igor
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
>> this vote is to release wicket 1.4.4
>>
>> branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.4/
>> artifacts: http://people.apac
+1
On Dec 16, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> this vote is to release wicket 1.4.5
>
> this build fixes some critical problems with 1.4.4, namely WICKET-2613
> and some modal-window related issues.
>
> branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.5/
> artifacts: ht
Under what circumstances does this become a problem?
I'm just curious about more details on this comment:
"The end result is that it does not break any existing applications that don't
already have a bug"
D/
On May 22, 2010, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> As you may have noticed over
Igor posted a comment to this bug saying that overriding isVisible() is "evil"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3171
I was surprised by this and am curious to hear more.
D/
0 at 4:49 PM, Douglas Ferguson <
> doug...@douglasferguson.us> wrote:
>
>> Igor posted a comment to this bug saying that overriding isVisible() is
>> "evil"
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3171
>>
>> I was surprised by this and am curious to hear more.
>>
>> D/
21 matches
Mail list logo
