Re: [VOTE] release wicket 1.4-rc6

[X] Yes release 1.4-rc6 [ ] No, don't release it 2009/6/30 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com: [X] Yes release 1.4-rc6 [ ] No, don't release it -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com

Bug in modal window.onBeforeRender - tests

Hi! For some reason ModalWindow assumes request is not ajax even though it is clicked via executeAjaxEvent: if (getWebRequest().isAjax() == false) { shown = false; // This hides the button } Thread [main] (Suspended

Re: Problem with Required component message

I did this by creating a properties file MyPanel.properties and then setting creditCardForm.ccNumber.Required=Please enter your credit card number. Did you try setting form.componentId.Required? Or even panel.form.componentId.Required The problem is that my field is on a ListView. I cannot

Re: taking the I out of Interface

-1 If it ain't broken, don't try to fix it. ** Martin

Re: taking the I out of Interface

Well.. if it runs it ain't broken. But ofcourse if we want to refactor just for the sake of arts, why the hell not! ** Martin 2009/10/3 Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com: If it ain't broken, don't try to fix it. The thing here is that not all of us agree that it ain't broken. -Matej

Re: taking the I out of Interface

I am also curious how much more difficult it will make to switch from 1.4 to 1.5. The cost of renaming according to some fasion might accumulate to millions of dollars in worldwide development teams. Just for the sake of some damn another naming gimmic which does not bring any real functionality

Re: taking the I out of Interface

not bankrupt anyone. -Matej On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: I am also curious how much more difficult it will make to switch from 1.4 to 1.5. The cost of renaming according to some fasion might accumulate to millions of dollars

Re: taking the I out of Interface

Very good point. I am worried that changing the i will only make some very few core develoeprs or newcomers slightly bit happier until they forget about that new thang. ** Martin 2009/10/3 James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com: For the record, I'm -1 also (non-binding of course).  We have

Re: taking the I out of Interface

+1 data proxy or model proxy or proxymodel or wrapper model 2009/10/4 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com: On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote: Should we rename IModel to Model we would also have to rename Model to something. ObjectModel sounds like

Commit quickfix WICKET-2522?

Hi! Would anybody with commit rights wanna commit one-liner fix + attached unit tests for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2522 ** Martin

Re: True?

Here it was: http://techblog.molindo.at/2009/09/wicketstuff-merged-resources-new-much-simpler-version.html 2009/10/14 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com: Me either. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Matej Knopp

Re: Commit quickfix WICKET-2522?

Patch and junit test attached to jira. Hope it doesn't break anything... ** Martin 2009/10/14 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: Hi! Would anybody with commit rights wanna commit one-liner fix + attached unit tests for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2522

Re: Problem with IFormsubmitting

Hi! The proposed solution does not work with Modal Windows!! * http://osdir.com/ml/users-wicket.apache.org/2009-11/msg00076.html Modal windws have a fake parent form: form style=border-width: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: transparent; position: static; .. and ofcourse it

New behavior: AjaxFormSubmittingChangeListenerBehavior

) { throw new RuntimeException(e); } } } ** Martin 2009/11/4 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: Hi! The proposed solution does not work with Modal Windows!! * http://osdir.com/ml/users-wicket.apache.org/2009-11/msg00076.html Modal windws have a fake parent form

Re: Patch for easy Enums I18N

I vote for EnumChoiceRender instead of full DropDownChoice. However. EnumChoiceRenderer can render any TYPE so that's why I have proposed TypeChoiceRenderer. You can directly use it with existing wicket and no need for specific dropdown. ** Martin 2009/11/11 Olivier Croisier

Re: Patch for easy Enums I18N

would need to take a Component as a constructor parameter, to call getString() on, This is not true. Localizer is available everywhere. Application.get().getResourceSettings().getLocalizer(); ** Martin On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote

Re: Patch for easy Enums I18N

-formed patch instead of plain-text code in the Jira comment. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: I admit the EnumDropDownChoice is more of a convenient class that a real new feature. It's simply an overkill for the purpose. I loved

Re: Doubt about form components

Hi! Hi, the form component clearInput method that clean this state is called on the valid method. I'm trying to guess why the form component keep his raw input after an form processing with errors.  I can't figure out why don't clear the raw input in this situation, since on the next form

Re: Doubt about form components

Hi! I don't know the original design but if you (e.g., ajax) redraw some components it's goddamn useful to have the raw input. Say that you redraw erroneous components with red border like I do. You would lose the raw value if you clear that and the user would lose the input. Actually this

Re: Doubt about form components

Hi! What's the difference whether it's thrown away or not if the next step is re-submit with new values? ** Martin 2010/2/22 Pedro Santos pedros...@gmail.com: IMO the form processing can be: 1. validate 2. detect error 3. keep rawinput 4. re-render error components with red border AND

Re: Doubt about form components

on the text field model 4 - you has now an text field presenting the wrong user typed value, and the new one on the component model on server. On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! What's the difference whether it's thrown away

Re: Igor did it!

Now there is time for RFEs ;) ? 2010/3/2 Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com: All tests in Wicket Trunk pass (except that one ignored, whatever that is). Kudos to Igor! -Matej

Re: Igor did it!

Yeah.. someone went and localized the h:mm(a---) in java some time ago whose results are surprising. I am not completely convinced it (a) should be locale-specific (am/pm). In my opinnion the expected is wrong here, but on the other hand I am not a linguist:

Re: Examples for the new request mappers

Hi M! Is was there a tutorial on this topic? ** Martin 2010/7/24 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: Hi, I just added a new wicket-examples application (Wicket 1.5 only) showing two custom request mappers: * custom home page - e.g. requesting http://example.com will load

Re: Examples for the new request mappers

Any brief what this is all about ;) ? Sounds interesting but I don't have any clue. Any selected links to previous discussion on the topic? ** Martin 2010/7/24 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: For now the only tutorial is the source code :-/ On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Martin

Re: [jira] Commented: (WICKET-2967) org.apache.wicket.util.value.Count: add decrement method

It's an automated list so you are responsible for both subscribing and unsubscribing yourself. ** Martin 2010/7/26 Steven Tierney steven.tier...@brightpurple.co.uk: Please un subscribe me from this mailing list Thanks Steven Tierney Bright Purple Resourcing Ltd Senior ConsultantBR The

Re: 1.4.13 release?

Since you are asking ;-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2729 2010/10/16 Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com: Anybody interested in a 1.4.13 release in the coming week?  Anything that you'd like to get in before it's built?  I may have some time next week to do it. --

ModalWindow inside modalwindow in iframe not supported?

Hi! Why is this not fixed /fixable: http://www.mail-archive.com/comm...@wicket.apache.org/msg10857.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel There is a fix proposal, so why not? ** Martin

Bug ? form.isMultiPart().anyEmbeddedMultipart picks multipart also from hidden items?

Hi! Is it a bug or a feature that form.isMultiPart().anyEmbeddedMultipart picks ismultipart also from hidden nested forms (that are not visible in hierarchy)? form modalwindow panel form-with-multipart-but-not-visible-before-modalwindow-is-opened ** Martin

Re: Bug ? form.isMultiPart().anyEmbeddedMultipart picks multipart also from hidden items?

() fc.isEnabledInHierarchy()) { isMultiPart = fc.isMultiPart(); } } if (isMultiPart == true) { anyEmbeddedMultipart[0] = true; return STOP_TRAVERSAL; } return CONTINUE_TRAVERSAL; } }); So it takes into account the visibility On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku

Re: Welcome Martin Grigorov as a core team member

Hi Martin! Pls take a look at a fix for ModalWindows that are nested inside IFrame: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3151 This wasn't supported before but Rodolfo kindly added support for it and fixed some bugs in it. ** Martin Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:54:07 -0700 Martin Grigorov

Re: Welcome Martin Grigorov as a core team member

AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi Martin! Pls take a look at a fix for ModalWindows that are nested inside IFrame: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3151 This wasn't supported before but Rodolfo kindly added support for it and fixed some bugs

Re: Welcome Martin Grigorov as a core team member

wicket-level functionality to test. All changes are in javascript. Is it possible to drop in selenium tests? ** Martin On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Ok. We are currently testing it and if you have any test code snipplet requests

Re: Welcome Martin Grigorov as a core team member

or Safari and start filing tickets ... If you can create Selenium/WebDriver/... tests for wicket-examples ajax modal window this will be the best. You can even extend the example to use nested iframe for this ticket. On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku

isVisibleInHierarchy() possibly unnecessarily checks children whose parents are invisible?

Hi! I have a page with two panels: page.add(panel1); page.add(panel2); in some situations panel1 is not visible. However, a form submit event will visit all formcomponents of panel1 via: at

Re: isVisibleInHierarchy() possibly unnecessarily checks children whose parents are invisible?

Hi! Created jira issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3166 2010/11/12 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: Hi! I have a page with two panels: page.add(panel1); page.add(panel2); in some situations panel1 is not visible. However, a form submit event

Re: isVisibleInHierarchy() possibly unnecessarily checks children whose parents are invisible?

this? The isEnabledInHierarchty uses a caching mechanism. Maybe this will also need to cache the isparentvisible at each level thus avoiding O(n^n) recursion. Any suggestions how to speed it up? ** Maritin 2010/11/13 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: Hi! Created jira issue at https

Re: isVisibleInHierarchy() possibly unnecessarily checks children whose parents are invisible?

Hah.. actually there is an unnecessary recursion in the proposal. The while-loop is no longer needed if parent is already called. ** Martin 2010/11/14 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: Hi! The fix I proposed does fix the probelm at hand but it makes page rendering

Re: overriding isVisible bad?

What about using onconfigure to replace loadabledetachablemodel ? We have had some trouble with loadabledetachablemodels when their state is frozen before a dependent model has been initialized (for example) and we need to call model.detach() from within our code, which seems bit hacky.

Re: more explicit handling of null values - yay or nay?

How would it simplify actual code? ** Martin 2011/1/5 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com: ive recently ran into a few cases where while implementing ajaxfallbacklink i forgot to test the passed in request target for null, causing NPEs when the app was accessed from browsers where ajax

Re: more explicit handling of null values - yay or nay?

parameter is optional, it can prevent some runtime NPE by exposing in a very clear way at development time that some parameter may be null. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: How would it simplify actual code? ** Martin 2011/1/5 Igor

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

I would adopt scala immediately if it had all the IDE tools Java has with equal reliability (amount of showstopper/awkward bugs). So guess it's just a matter of time, if nobody comes up with something better. Lots of people are taught into coding java (as if that helps ;), so one day when people

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

Nice or complete? ** Martin 2011/1/7 Jonathan Locke jonathan.lo...@gmail.com: Have you checked out IDEA? My Scala friends tell me it has pretty nice Scala support. Jon Less is more. http://www.amazon.com/Coding-Software-Process-Jonathan-Locke/dp/0615404820/ -- View this message in

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

) On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Liam Clarke-Hutchinson l...@steelsky.co.nzwrote: Define complete. On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Nice or complete? ** Martin 2011/1/7 Jonathan Locke jonathan.lo...@gmail.com: Have

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

, 2011 at 1:34 AM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote: Since scala is statically-typed, the ide can (and does) give you contextual help very easily On Jan 8, 2011 2:21 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:  But it will do the right thing about 90% of the time

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

Hi! You would use a more domain-oriented design approach.  Setters/getters are merely used because of all the frameworks that support (and expect) them.  Why do you care where the man is carrying his pencil? Perhaps he's keeping it in his sock. All you want to do is ask the man object for a

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

Hi! public T T borrowObject(ClassT objectType) where you can do Pencil p = man.borrowObject(Pencil.class); Either way, you have to put logic somewhere that tries to figure out what the heck you want to borrow and then figure out where the heck to get it. If it is done at compile time

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

Either way, you have to put logic somewhere that tries to figure out what the heck you want to borrow and then figure out where the heck to get it. If it is done at compile time you don't need messaging logic. It would be uniquely defined what you can get. Please explain. Think about

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

, and all that magic will probably make things harder to follow. But; like all shotguns, it's everyone's responsibility where they aim, lest they shoot themselves in the foot. :D On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 10:00 +0200, Martin Makundi wrote: Either way, you have to put logic somewhere that tries

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

Why people use C++ to facilitate making business a mess? ** Martin 2011/1/19 Liam Clarke-Hutchinson l...@steelsky.co.nz: Hey mate, I code Java for my day job, and write my fun code in Scala. I just love the flexibility of Scala combined with the power to use all my existing Java libraries.

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

The only thing that bugs me about scala is its flexibility of accepting different kind of notation. It's that what was the downfall of html: making complilers flexible to allow various human input and as end result none of the browsers work correctly because the truth is only in the eye of the

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

not sure why it was never officially proposed yet...    []s Gus On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: The only thing that bugs me about scala is its flexibility of accepting different kind of notation. It's that what was the downfall of html

Re: Scala-Wicket Help and Advice

on this mailing list.  We're not discussing anything related to Wicket anymore. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:57 AM, richard emberson richard.ember...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/19/2011 07:22 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: The only thing that bugs me about scala is its flexibility of accepting

Re: How to streamline ajax page region toggle

Hi! EnclosureResolvercontainer.autoAdd is invoked at render phase? Would it be necessary to hook into a different event (instead of onBeforeRender) or could it be pre-sniffed at onBeforeRender? ** Martin 2011/1/21 Joo Hama joonas.hamalai...@gmail.com: I tested this idea by adding the code

Re: WicketTester#assertInvisible

This is a fundamental dilemma ;) Also on implementation side somebody may implement: 1) isvisible() { return super.isvisible() businesslogic.isvisible(); } or simply 2) isvisible() { return businesslogic.isvisible(); } So if 2) is allowed and recommended, then isvisible is really only

Re: WicketTester#assertInvisible

I haven't looked at the exact implementation of WicketTester, but I think we should change the logic to pass assertInvisible if the component's isVisible method returns true, but some parent of the component (an enclosure, etc) is not visible, since in all reality, the component is then also

Re: How to streamline ajax page region toggle

; } //- On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! EnclosureResolvercontainer.autoAdd is invoked at render phase? Would it be necessary to hook into a different event (instead of onBeforeRender) or could it be pre-sniffed at onBeforeRender

MinimumValidator should have model?

Hi! MinimumValidator should have model so that boundaries must be initialized only for changed form components? ** Martin

Re: MinimumValidator should have model?

AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! MinimumValidator should have model so that boundaries must be initialized only for changed form components? ** Martin -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com

onBeforeRender called twice

Hi! Is it ok that onBeforeRender is called twice (1.4.9): 1. Server.handle(HttpConnection) line: 326 HttpConnection.handleRequest() line: 534 HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete() line: 864 HttpParser.parseNext() line: 539 2.

Re: Double invocation in Localizer

. The first call is called only if the returned 'value' is non-null. The second is called only if the value was null and defaultValue is used. On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! In wicket 1.4.17 it seems like there is deouble invocation

Re: Double invocation in Localizer

My observations were about 1.5. You are right about 1.4. One more proof that 1.5 is better :-) Anybody use 1.5 in production after refactoring from 1.4 ? ** Martin On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hmm.. I don't see that. I see

Possibility of nullpointer in wicket-ajax.js

Hi! Wicket-ajax 1.4 suffers nullpointer in Chrome: // go through newly added elements and try to find javascripts that // need to be executed while (element != next) { try { Wicket.Head.addJavascripts(element); } catch (ignore) { } element =

Re: Possibility of nullpointer in wicket-ajax.js

Oh, I so embrace Change ... ** Martin 2011/8/12 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: It is fixed in 1.4.18. It was caused by a change in Chrome (and later WebKit) behavior On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! Wicket-ajax 1.4

Self type

Hi! Is wicket using self type yet for methods like add(cc) {...; return this; } ? http://calliopesounds.blogspot.com/2010/11/having-java-generic-class-return-type.html ** Martin

Re: Self type

in MarkupContainer, etc. with all tests passing and some code simplification (or, at least, the removal of some casts). Ought to work in Java also. Richard On 08/29/2011 06:52 PM, Martin Makundi wrote: Hi! Is wicket using self type yet for methods like add(cc) {...; return this; } ? http

Wicket 1.4.17 wicket-event.js domready

Hi! I have noticed lots of document.body=null situations with domready in IE, I am currently trying out the following fix to wicket-event.js: var domReady = function() { function onBodyLoadedSafely() {

Re: Wicket 1.4.17 wicket-event.js domready

/browse/WICKET-4080 On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! I have noticed lots of document.body=null situations with domready in IE, I am currently trying out the following fix to wicket-event.js:                                var

Re: Wicket 1.4.17 wicket-event.js domready

Umh.. not 1.4.17? We are in 1.4.17. 2011/9/30 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: This affects 1.4 also? 2011/9/30 Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org: Hopefully with https://github.com/martin-g/wicket/tree/ajax-jquery merged in Wicket.next this kind of problems will be much

Re: Wicket 1.4.17 wicket-event.js domready

implementation on IE. Perhaps, we can 'borrow' JQuery's ready implementation for now? On Friday 30 September 2011 09:18:32 Martin Makundi wrote: Umh.. not 1.4.17? We are in 1.4.17. 2011/9/30 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com: This affects 1.4 also? 2011/9/30 Martin Grigorov

Re: Wicket 1.4.17 wicket-event.js domready

event in AJAX, you should just evaluate the statements after updating the DOM. AFAIC, this is what AjaxHeaderResponse does for calls to renderOnDomReadyJavaScript. On Friday 30 September 2011 09:30:58 Martin Makundi wrote: The problem with qjuery domready is that it ALWAYS renders domready

Re: Wicket 1.4.17 wicket-event.js domready

2011/9/30 Emond Papegaaij emond.papega...@topicus.nl: In Wicket-1.5, this already is the case. So I guess, you'll have to upgrade... Is same in 1.4 also. IE is the problem, not wicket ;] ** Martin On Friday 30 September 2011 09:49:51 Martin Makundi wrote: Yes but you don't want to code

Proposal for 1.4.x

Hi! For debugging, in Component.java: try { modelChanging(); model.setObject(object); modelChanged(); } catch (Throwable t) { throw new RuntimeException(PageRelativePath: + getPageRelativePath(), t); } ** Martin

Re: Proposal for 1.4.x

, Exception is enough But can you give more details On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! For debugging, in Component.java:    try {      modelChanging();      model.setObject(object);      modelChanged();    } catch (Throwable t

Re: Queueing components?

It was so difficult to get the feature approved we didn't want to slow the process down by debating its name then. But now might be a good time ;) ** Martin 2012/4/11 Minas Manthos minas.mant...@gmail.com: Hi I know there is already a lot discussion about Component queueing

Re: wicket job opportunity, we are hiring

Why not stretch your hours Cedric, and have day off in your country ;) 2012/6/6 Cedric Gatay gata...@gmail.com: Hi Igor, this is an interesting opportunity, too bad it is time zone limited. I hope you'll find somebody. __ Cedric Gatay http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr |

Re: Method chaining

Java should natively chain all void instance methods... ** Martin 2014-01-31 Sven Meier s...@meiers.net I don't think it makes sense here: In all of Wicket's code there's a single place only, where two metaData entries are set consecutively. Sven On 01/31/2014 03:08 PM, Martin Grigorov

Re: Wikipedia comparison of frameworks: wicket is not MVC?

One can build a controller to manage all the onConfigure(xx) but the wicket framework does not provide a controller so basically it's left for the developer. ** Martin 2014-11-02 17:52 GMT+02:00 Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com: On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:37 PM, andrea del bene

Re: Ideas for wicket 7.0

isBusySignal() { return busySignal; } } ** Martin On Jan 10, 2015 4:43 AM, Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote: Hi! I tried to add and idea to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Ideas+for+Wicket+7.0 However I cannot find any edit buttons when

Ideas for wicket 7.0

Hi! I tried to add and idea to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Ideas+for+Wicket+7.0 However I cannot find any edit buttons when Logged in to confluence. The contribution page says anybody can contribute? My idea is related to Better stateless support

Re: Ideas for wicket 7.0

-01-10 7:47 GMT+02:00 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com : Wicket 7.0.0 is about to be released so it's a bit late for ideas. =) Is there a board for ideas for next one? But what you describe sounds like what wicketstuff-stateless project already provides. I looked

Blocking page serialization

Hi! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6177 We have a performance issue with our Wicket app, page serialization causes inconvenience to user because PageStoreManager.storeTouchedPages() blocks the request until pageSerializer.serialize(page) has been handled. Could this be solved by

Help in completing task

Hi! We are looking to hire somebody to help us complete https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6177 Anyone? Thanks. ** Martin

Re: Multi-tab / window support in Wicket 7.5

:00 Urbani, Edmund <edmund.urb...@lilandit.com>: > Ok, but how do you create a session per tab? Also, I would at least need > to login the authenticated user in the new session. > > > On 12/07/2016 11:43 AM, Martin Makundi wrote: > > We have noticed that most robust if yo

Re: Multi-tab / window support in Wicket 7.5

com/mtgrigorov > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Martin Makundi < > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > > > This should be built into wicket core, automatic session management. > Login > > once and enable multiple tabs and a new sub-session for ea

Re: How to automatically log access to data objects in wicket gui

raining and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Martin Makundi < > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > > > Thanks > > > > We don't want to log ALL invocations, only those in particular wicket > > imodels. Aspe

Re: Ajax refresh and feedback panel

obably the existing test case for normal rendering (if such exists) could be modified for testing the same with ajax update. ** Martin > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Martin Makundi < &

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

+1 2017-12-29 17:22 GMT+02:00 Sven Meier : > Not strictly necessary, but I would like to merge WICKET-6503: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6503 > > Have fun > Sven > > > Am 29.12.2017 um 06:02 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > >> Hello All, >> >> Is it time for

Re: 8.0.0 blockers

If configuration option is final solution then yes, otherwise it opens a new can of worms for backwards (and on-site branching) compatibility. ** Martin +0.02 2018-01-02 12:29 GMT+02:00 Korbinian Bachl : > May I ask why not a simple Config option? When disabled

Re: WICKET-6514 and FeedbackPanel

What is the reasoning behind the "design" of not showing session level feedback messages? ** Martin 2018-01-04 4:41 GMT+02:00 Maxim Solodovnik : > I thought this API break was "by design" > Maybe this can be documented instead? > > WBR, Maxim > (from mobile, sorry for the