Re: Kannel wap limits ?
If the phone really supports ESAR, it should send number of groups tpi. Otherwise it is just sending content SAR could not handle. Aarno On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 11:56 AM, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: Citando Igor Ivoilov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have to fix wpt layer to do not panic if psn is going to be 255 but this is a limit of SAR and can be overcome with ESAR. Does 3650 support ESAR? I don't have such a phone to check it by myself So it seems altough kannel's only relevant information is the 350K sdu. -- Davi / Bruno.RodriguesatLitux.Org Litux.org: 10:54:26 up 87 days, 12:10, 8 users, load average: 0.03, 0.05, 0.01 'Linus? Whose that? -- clueless newbie on #Linux'
Re: Cookie handling
Bruno Rodrigues wrote: Citando Wilms, Stefan, VIS-THND [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Dear all, trying to get access to our intranet via WAP, using kannel 1.1.6 (with --enable-cookies compiled) There's something wrong with cookie support but as I'm gonna need them to work soon for a project of mine, I'll look at the code and will make sure they work. me too. Bruno keep me and the others informed about issues via the mailing list, please. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Development Environments
Hi All, I have done most of my development work on Windows using VC6 and associated tools. I am new to the Linux environment and as such I was wondering what development environments (if any) and tools (CVS / debug / etc) you would recommend for use in development. I'm using RH7.3 w/ Kannel 1.3.0 Thanks. Paul
Re: Rotatelog for traditional Unix systems
A much cleaner version of the HUP code that
+ ACTIONS:
+ kill - HUP | ps -ef | grep -i production | awk '{print $2}' :
/var/log/kannel/access.log, /var/log/kannel/enpocket.log,
/var/log/kannel/smsbox.log
ACTIONS:
for pid in `ps -ef | grep -i bear | awk '{print $2}'` ; do kill -HUP $pid ;
done : /var/log/kannel/access.log, /var/log/kannel/enpocket.log,
/var/log/kannel/smsbox.log
Re: multiple bearer box ?
Citando Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Asif Ali wrote: hello all, i am new to this mailing list, i want to know if anybody's working on multi-bearer box architecture or there are any plans as it was identified as one of the key performance bottleneck issues, also the persistance of message streams as they pass through bearer box. hmm, I had that discussion with Alex from Centrium. They run an one bearerbox per smsc link architecture. It is definetly more performative if you get rid of all the required routing inside bearerbox if you use a bunch of smsc links inside one bearerbox, but it's more of theoretical interest. We run over 80 links in one bearerbox and fully stable. BTW, the performance bottle-neck will be of significanse when you get beyond 400 Msg/sec. (!) in MT/MO traffic, which I honestly don't expect you to have ;) We have only one bearerbox and one smsbox for 16 connections and alot of messages per day, and sometimes I'm scared when I enable a 50msg/sec on one of those connections for doing mass spam but then, while I'm sending them, I'm watching and testing the other connections and kannel works like a charm. Please note that usually I use post-xml to enable me to send like 10k destinations at one time, and thus have smsbox processing a xml post with 350KBytes, have the xml processing overhead, and have one smsbox thread creating that many messages in queue. What I mean it's might be a bigger peak processing than having 10k GET's and it works perfectly Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are -- Davi / Bruno.RodriguesatLitux.Org Litux.org: 13:27:05 up 88 days, 14:42, 2 users, load average: 0.14, 0.15, 0.09 'Linux is obsolete -- Andrew Tanenbaum'
Re: multiple bearer box ?
Bruno Rodrigues wrote: We have only one bearerbox and one smsbox for 16 connections and alot of messages per day, and sometimes I'm scared when I enable a 50msg/sec on one of those connections for doing mass spam but then, while I'm sending them, I'm watching and testing the other connections and kannel works like a charm. Please note that usually I use post-xml to enable me to send like 10k destinations at one time, and thus have smsbox processing a xml post with 350KBytes, have the xml processing overhead, and have one smsbox thread creating that many messages in queue. What I mean it's might be a bigger peak processing than having 10k GET's and it works perfectly cool. What was the highest peak (msg/sec.) you had in the bearerbox (over all connections)? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: multiple bearer box ?
Citando Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What was the highest peak (msg/sec.) you had in the bearerbox (over all connections)? I think my peak was in a campaign that was delayed and then I needed every resource available to do it and I had something like 50+15+5+3+2+several 1 msg/sec connections, which gives like 80 msg/sec -- Davi / Bruno.RodriguesatLitux.Org Litux.org: 20:36:09 up 88 days, 21:51, 4 users, load average: 0.85, 0.54, 0.36 'AUTHOR FvwmAuto just appeared one day, nobody knows how. -- FvwmAuto(1x)'
Re: Cookie handling
Citando Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bruno Rodrigues schrieb: BTW: has anyone done anything for gw authentication ? I'm thinking about doing code to enable user/pass authentication in wap gw and have a exec/get-url/post-url passing user/pass and expecting a msisdn. Then have something like map-url to define which url's will wap gw send the msisdn, and which header name will it have. the WAP gateway supports HTTP Basic Authentication as specified in RFC2616. Same with get-url. It uses the get-url = user:pass@http://www.foobar.com; syntax. I mean authentication at mobile side - in your mobile configuration, you have credentials for csd(ras) or gprs(apn) authentication, which you'll use the one you get from your mobile provider, and a gateway authentication which will be sent to kannel. I intent to use the gateway credentials to translate user+pass+sourceip to msisdn and then have kannel injecting an msisdn header at the http side. When kannel receives a new connection (from a new user+pass+ip), it will request an external script/url with those values. this script/url will give back a msisdn or a reject signal. Then, when kannel fetch content from external servers, it will include the msisdn header. For that I'll also need to code an url list of can-send-msisdn and code to implement several known msisdn headers: for example, cmg is a regular header and ericsson uses a packed msisdn value. Although we can have an example script in kannel cvs, you'll need to do your own script to connect to your local architecture - it could be a script querying a radius server or a script authenticating against mysql/ldap/SSO system. -- Davi / Bruno.RodriguesatLitux.Org Litux.org: 20:38:06 up 88 days, 21:53, 4 users, load average: 0.57, 0.54, 0.37 'finlandia:~ apropos win win: nothing appropriate.'
Re: multiple bearer box ?
Hi, On Wednesday 19 February 2003 11:03, Stipe Tolj wrote: Asif Ali wrote: hello all, i am new to this mailing list, i want to know if anybody's working on multi-bearer box architecture or there are any plans as it was identified as one of the key performance bottleneck issues, also the persistance of message streams as they pass through bearer box. hmm, I had that discussion with Alex from Centrium. They run an one bearerbox per smsc link architecture. It is definetly more Not 100% true ;) We run one logical link per bearerbox (e.g. 3 sessions for one offerer). For now I have not seen any performance bottleneck issues with bearerbox. Some of our bearerboxes running with ~60sms/sec. Now you will ask, why multiple bearerboxes ;) It's easy... It's more simple to maintain/route messages beetwen multiple bearerboxes. For example bearerbox do not support dynamic config reload and it's just more simple to read/write ~30 Lines of config file as 300 lines ;) performative if you get rid of all the required routing inside bearerbox if you use a bunch of smsc links inside one bearerbox, but it's more of theoretical interest. We run over 80 links in one bearerbox and fully stable. BTW, the performance bottle-neck will be of significanse when you get beyond 400 Msg/sec. (!) in MT/MO traffic, which I honestly don't expect you to have ;) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are -- Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Köln Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___ Centrium GmbH Ehrenstraße 2 50672 Köln Fon: +49 (0221) 277 49 240 Fax: +49 (0221) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.centrium.de msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kannel_sessions
Hi friends!!! I'm using the kannel 1.3.0 with the kwtls patch (redhat 7.2). But I realized that the kwtls patch falls down often, mainly when I have 20 users aprox. -I want to know how many users online does the kannel and the patch support? -How many threads could be created by the kannel? -How does the kannel work with the sessions? -How long will a session last? Thanks in advance, Please reply me! _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
kannel_sessions
Hi friends!!! I'm using the kannel 1.3.0 with the kwtls patch (redhat 7.2). But I realized that the kwtls patch falls down often, mainly when I have 20 users aprox. I'm trying to solve this problem and find the cause. -I want to know how many users online does the kannel and the patch support? -How many threads could be created by the kannel? -How does the kannel work with the sessions? -How long will a session last? Thanks in advance, Please reply me! Regards, Mary _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
