Hi,
We are using the http queueing facility within the smsbox to handle the
cases where there might be outages of our internal systems. On testing
recently following a loarge outage of one system, I have found some
strange behaviour.
We had approx 400 messages in the retry queue due to the
Am 02.09.2009 um 16:07 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
Self-answering:
From: aguerri...@kannel.org
Subject:Re: [PATCH] add support of smsc-id for smpp-tlv group
Date: 2 de septiembre de 2009 16:03:20 GMT+02:00
To: devel@kannel.org
Reply-To:
Self-answering:
From: aguerri...@kannel.org
Subject:Re: [PATCH] add support of smsc-id for smpp-tlv group
Date: 2 de septiembre de 2009 16:03:20 GMT+02:00
To: devel@kannel.org
Reply-To: devel@kannel.org
It must be mailman adding it. M
Nikos,
I've received your email and the headers are:
From: nbalka...@gmail.com
Subject:Re: [PATCH] add support of smsc-id for smpp-tlv group
Date: 2 de septiembre de 2009 15:48:20 GMT+02:00
To: amal...@kannel.org
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Hi Alex,
Your comment at that point could have been more clear:
/* The default smsc-id is set to "def;ault" since it is an illegal smsc-id and
cannot be configured by a user */
And please reply to my latest mail in the thread, otherwise you are quoting out
of context.
With respect to lists:
>
ok, fixed and commited to cvs...
Thanks,
Alex
Am 02.09.2009 um 13:35 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
Patch looks good (and very welcome!)
+1
PS: There's another typo, "can'be" instead of "can't be" on the
comment for "def;ault".
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org
On 02/09/2009,
Patch looks good (and very welcome!)
+1
PS: There's another typo, "can'be" instead of "can't be" on the
comment for "def;ault".
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org
On 02/09/2009, at 12:57, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Am 02.09.2009 um 12:33 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Yes, but octstr_
Am 02.09.2009 um 12:33 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Yes, but octstr_split can return a single member list, same way it
would handle single smsc-ids configured by the user. I have no
reading problems, and your comment doesn't explain why you have to
use a list of smscs as your default, just that
Please disregard. Now I get it. You want to protect against the case that
someone actually names his smsc as "default" in his configuration.
Looks good. +1.
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Nikos Balkanas
To: Alexander Malysh
Cc: de...@vm1.kannel.org
Sent: Wednesday, Septemb
Yes, but octstr_split can return a single member list, same way it would handle
single smsc-ids configured by the user. I have no reading problems, and your
comment doesn't explain why you have to use a list of smscs as your default,
just that ';' can be used as list seperator since it is not al
Hi,
Am 02.09.2009 um 10:13 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Hi Alex,
Looks good. Some typos:
Userguide:
string <-> stringr
...this TLV valid <-> ...this TLV is valid(twice).
fixed in my version...
gw/smsc/smpp_pdu.c: 69
+#define DEFAULT_SMSC_ID "def;ault"
Is this right? Did you mean "default"?
Hi Alex,
Looks good. Some typos:
Userguide:
string <-> stringr
...this TLV valid <-> ...this TLV is valid(twice).
gw/smsc/smpp_pdu.c: 69
+#define DEFAULT_SMSC_ID "def;ault"
Is this right? Did you mean "default"?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Malysh"
To: "Develo
12 matches
Mail list logo
