An HTTP 'callback' sounds good as an initial implementation. Generic and
flexible.
yep. I'm also in a favor of this. Where API should be very simplified
like:
earerbox calls http://www.foob.com/?msisdn=msisdn and that HTTP
server replies with either an smsc-id as body/header(?!) or nothing
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
as many countries deploy MSISDN number portability in their GSM
networks, which means you as a end-customer can take your MSISDN to an
other operator when you switch, makes things a bit more complicated on
the SMS gateway side.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Nisan Bloch wrote:
I would prefer to see some sort of lookup interface.. Something like a
HLR box.
Of more importance is how to implement the lookup and when (as this will
incur a msg cost)? Use some third party? Do some SS7 integration? Booktrout
Ideally this would look like the SMSCConn abstraction layer itself for
the resolving of the network.
A first scratch may be an simple HTTP lookup to an resolving server
which then answers with a given smsc-id we simply inject to the Msg
struct and then route via this smsc-id.
Any ideas
now, in Germany we have an access to an centralized database which
holds all ported numbers. So actually if you want to route messages to
Operator SMSCs, you must resolve the MSISDN at that database to know
if it has been ported to an other operator and hence route it to the
new one instead
We'd be interested - +1 from me.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Alexei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [RFC] Number portability hooks
Sounds illegal to me to make this information public.
But anyone with SS7 access can do
At 12:20 PM 8/11/03 +0200, you wrote:
Any ideas and comments please?!
Yeah.
For interactive services, where an app responds to an MO SM with an MT
SM within a timeframe of at most a few minutes, you can do most NP work
very simply under certain conditions, namely when all bearerbox
- Original Message -
From: Steve Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [RFC] Number portability hooks
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Nisan Bloch wrote:
I would prefer to see some sort of lookup interface
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:51:16PM +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
The question is would we do some kind of internal caching for this?
This would speed up things drastically. Maybe using a *huge* Dict
hash?
Has anyone used huge Dict hashs?
Look at cdb, good for multiple reads, not so good for
-
From: Steve Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [RFC] Number portability hooks
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Nisan Bloch wrote:
I would prefer to see some sort of lookup interface.. Something like a
HLR box
On Montag, August 11, 2003, at 05:15 Uhr, Steve Kennedy wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Nisan Bloch wrote:
I would prefer to see some sort of lookup interface.. Something like a
HLR box.
Of more importance is how to implement the lookup and when (as this
will
incur a msg
11 matches
Mail list logo
